S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition - Page 90
Register

User Tag List

Page 90 of 100 FirstFirst ... 40 80 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... LastLast
Results 4,451 to 4,500 of 4999
  1. ISO #4451

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    Your memory is probably more accurate than mine. I immediately wrote off the bows as overpriced garbage.

    Regardless, the bows couldn’t kill at any point prior to Forsaken leaving because he likely had the most gold.
    My paranoia may be getting the better of me but I do not see how you would write off an insta-auto kill as garbage. I figured a scum would really want that and I think I was right.

    That interaction you had with Forsaken really has me stuck. The question he asked you makes zero sense with the items you claimed and in context it really looks like he was leveraging your arm there.

    Valid point on it not killing him but it could be by design. The issue that he seemed to pick items to sell makes me think he may have immunity to the bows. Why would he let the town buy stuff that would kill him? That does not make sense to me making me think he could not be effected by the bow.

  2. ISO #4452

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    My paranoia may be getting the better of me but I do not see how you would write off an insta-auto kill as garbage. I figured a scum would really want that and I think I was right.

    That interaction you had with Forsaken really has me stuck. The question he asked you makes zero sense with the items you claimed and in context it really looks like he was leveraging your arm there.

    Valid point on it not killing him but it could be by design. The issue that he seemed to pick items to sell makes me think he may have immunity to the bows. Why would he let the town buy stuff that would kill him? That does not make sense to me making me think he could not be effected by the bow.
    … I’m lost.

    The bows couldn’t do anything because they would all lock on to Forsaken, who had the most gold. Forsaken had immunity to attacks.

    I think(?) I understand what you’re hung up on. I can’t ease that fear now but I can revisit it postgame if you would like.

  3. ISO #4453

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Purple View Post
    Bizarro's not claiming any alarming info on Dark Unicorn looks good for DU. If DU was triad Bizarro would have known that DU was in a chat and called him out for it, or just shoot him like he shot Kitty.
    If they are the source of my parasite. Again, I am not convinced they are. I trust their flip more than others and it would not make sense for their parasite to have some negative utility like that which is not mentioned in their role card.

    The only way it could have been theirs imo is if they were tailored which is why I keep saying that issue is not resolved.

  4. ISO #4454

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    … I’m lost.

    The bows couldn’t do anything because they would all lock on to Forsaken, who had the most gold. Forsaken had immunity to attacks.

    I think(?) I understand what you’re hung up on. I can’t ease that fear now but I can revisit it postgame if you would like.
    Forsaken was the shop keeper.

    Looking at their role card they chose which items to list and for how much.

    Why would they list bows that would specifically target them if it could kill them? That does not make sense unless the bows could not harm them.

  5. ISO #4455

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    As for my role I would rather not full claim for no reason. I could have some good utility as the game goes on but that will be substantially ruined if I claim.

    On top of that roles do not equal alignments in any way. I get that typically people mass claim at some point to sort the game but unless someone can voice a reason as to why I should reveal my role I am against it. I feel it will hurt the town so there has to be some benefit other than curiosity. Lets not get caught up in 'what we would normally do' and instead consider 'what has value in this situation.'
    Yeah, this is the right lie detector target imo. Unicorn is going to be unprovable AND conflicts with Chad's feedback.

  6. ISO #4456

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    Forsaken was the shop keeper.

    Looking at their role card they chose which items to list and for how much.

    Why would they list bows that would specifically target them if it could kill them? That does not make sense unless the bows could not harm them.
    You’re right. I think that points to be bows being night only- which is what I thought they were 20 minutes ago.

  7. ISO #4457

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    My paranoia may be getting the better of me but I do not see how you would write off an insta-auto kill as garbage. I figured a scum would really want that and I think I was right.

    That interaction you had with Forsaken really has me stuck. The question he asked you makes zero sense with the items you claimed and in context it really looks like he was leveraging your arm there.

    Valid point on it not killing him but it could be by design. The issue that he seemed to pick items to sell makes me think he may have immunity to the bows. Why would he let the town buy stuff that would kill him? That does not make sense to me making me think he could not be effected by the bow.
    I did not buy anything for a long time. I tried buying a poison blowdart to kill Myopia on what I believe to be D2, but they were all sold before I came in. Thus, I would probably have been the victim of the Robinhood Bow in the event Forsaken would have been immune to it, right? I don't think bows were used. I don't know what happened with them either, though.

  8. ISO #4458

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    You’re right. I think that points to be bows being night only- which is what I thought they were 20 minutes ago.
    I am like 95% sure they are instant. I remember when I bought them I had not read about the delay and being worried that someone would quick buy and use it any moment.

    There is no reason I would have asked the questions I did and been worried if it was a night only use item. Like.. I can not remember its exact wording but I do remember my thought process to the situation.

  9. ISO #4459

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    I am like 95% sure they are instant. I remember when I bought them I had not read about the delay and being worried that someone would quick buy and use it any moment.

    There is no reason I would have asked the questions I did and been worried if it was a night only use item. Like.. I can not remember its exact wording but I do remember my thought process to the situation.
    Then I got no idea.

  10. ISO #4460

  11. ISO #4461

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    Yeah, this is the right lie detector target imo. Unicorn is going to be unprovable AND conflicts with Chad's feedback.
    If i lie detect anyone, it is not to confirm alignments, not doing that again.

    I could lie detect his parasite claim though.

    What do you think about that @FM-Dark Unicorn

  12. ISO #4462

  13. ISO #4463

  14. ISO #4464

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Purple View Post
    If i lie detect anyone, it is not to confirm alignments, not doing that again.

    I could lie detect his parasite claim though.

    What do you think about that @FM-Dark Unicorn
    I really don't care. There is no reason for me to make up a parasite claim and radically change how I play my role because of it.

  15. ISO #4465

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    I remember posting about how the bows were going to likely target the shopkeeper on the day they were listed. That’s all I remember about them.
    Again though, Why would the shopkeeper list an item that would specifically target and kill them? Regardless of if the action happens day or night this line of thinking does not make sense.

  16. ISO #4466

  17. ISO #4467

  18. ISO #4468

  19. ISO #4469

  20. ISO #4470

  21. ISO #4471

  22. ISO #4472

  23. ISO #4473

  24. ISO #4474

  25. ISO #4475

  26. ISO #4476

  27. ISO #4477

  28. ISO #4478

  29. ISO #4479

  30. ISO #4480

  31. ISO #4481

  32. ISO #4482

  33. ISO #4483

  34. ISO #4484

  35. ISO #4485

  36. ISO #4486

  37. ISO #4487

  38. ISO #4488

  39. ISO #4489

  40. ISO #4490

  41. ISO #4491

  42. ISO #4492

  43. ISO #4493

  44. ISO #4494

  45. ISO #4495

  46. ISO #4496

  47. ISO #4497

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    Eyh Earless.
    Can you explain your reasoning behind shooting when you could only kill town with a shot?
    They were widely scum read but everyone was (and practically still is) giving them a free pass. It gave me the chance to come in here and say have a confirmed scum check and if I was wrong I don't think anyone would have missed them greatly

  48. ISO #4498

  49. ISO #4499

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    That, hiding the death tailor, and the fact CBI is potentially also self-resolving are the major factors in my vote on you.
    Myopias flip pretty much solves me as well...
    Based on father's ability, father can basically confirm I'm telling the truth as well

  50. ISO #4500

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •