S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition - Page 84
Register

User Tag List

Page 84 of 100 FirstFirst ... 34 74 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 94 ... LastLast
Results 4,151 to 4,200 of 4999
  1. ISO #4151

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Purple View Post
    I'm town. I made poor choices that I didn't believe they were poor choices back then. But as soon as you see my role, you will see that I have not played anti-town, I just executed my abilities the best way I could.

    You also sus me for having a lot of actions that are incredibly powerful, go and check some of the flips and tell me with a straight face that they are not more powerful than what I claimed.
    You're actually much more convincing with the rolecard just below. I think we should at the very least keep you as a dessert if we do end up having to lynch you, i.e. we lynch the scummier people first.

  2. ISO #4152

  3. ISO #4153

  4. ISO #4154

  5. ISO #4155

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    Hmm you are right.

    Maybe the faction is called Werewolves or something though?

    Its very clearly highlighted that mafia is in quotation marks meaning the name of the faciotn
    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    Purple's not a triad, so if there is only one scum faction then I'm probably wrong on Purple.

    I just think they are awfully anti-town
    This + the case you made on Purple is by far the towniest behavior you have ever exhibited. I am really tempted to say you are town tunnelling Purple, for better and for worse.

    By PoE, this leaves us with:

    CBI
    Myopia
    Earless
    Unicorn
    (Technically ohno from my point of view, but I haven't seen why they suddenly started trying hard and leading town today so this might change)

    Town being:
    Leaf (obviously)
    Purple
    Father
    Chad
    (Let's say I put ohno here)

    On 24 players, 10 have flipped town. We add the 5 players above, that makes 15/24 town. 1 neutral and 1 serial killer makes 17/24. 3 triad flipped makes 20/24. CBI and Myopia being other triads? Makes it weird that CBI was on Myopia's tied-leading wagon on D1 instead of being off-wagon or on Eyes, but not impossible that CBI would bus Myopia for being... of little value? Somewhat dubious, so might want to put Myopia elsewhere...?

    This tends to suggest the existence of another scum team with ~ 3 members, doesn't it?

  6. ISO #4156

  7. ISO #4157

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    LMAO here is Earless Artiste's role
    Waaaaaaaait why would Earless be Forum Mengsk? If he actually is, it's perfectly possible he is last Triad who tailored Tesseract as town, isn't it? Or that some flip is bogus?

    There also isn't a reason to ever keep Earless around. Never ever. In fact, he might be even scummier than Myopia, because he has no non-association with CBI, whereas Myopia does.

  8. ISO #4158

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    I cannot disagree with this. Except that he's poisoned and should never be healed, so there's no point in lynching him. But yes. I have no clue why we haven't lynched him earlier, like damnit lol.

    Also, I have re-read CBI's list of reads. I liked it while I was under the assumption Tesseract was definetly scum. But now, it awfully feels like CBI has been surfing on the chaos and has gladly supported mislynches while remaining thoroughly uncontroversial. So
    -vote FM-CBI Agent
    What mislynches have I supported?
    I was on the myopia train day 1, which thanks to comrade turned into a coin flip eyes lynch.
    Day 2 I was on tesseract which at the time everyone else seemed willing to hang if it weren't for the LHF triad red claim.
    and day 3 I was also on tesseract, which was the only train at ALL.

  9. ISO #4159

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Earless Artiste View Post
    Alignment: Town
    Role: Forum Mengsk

    Factional Abilities:
    Town is the uninformed majority and receives no factional abilities.

    Win Condition:
    Eliminate all anti-town factions.

    Rolecard:
    Forum Mengsk

    I will not be stopped. Not by you, or the mafia, or the third party, or anyone. I will rule this thread or see it burnt to ashes around me!


    A one-shot night kill, which will not work upon targeting a non-town (town being the uninformed majority faction) and will be treated as if you were role-blocked. This kill cannot be protected against except for role-blocks or redirections.

    If either:
    XXXXXXX
    XXXXXXD
    There has been at most 1 non-town death by the end of night 2

    Then the following will happen:

    Your role will be re-named to Emperor Mengsk.

    You will gain another one-shot night-kill, but instead of working against town it will work against any non-town (hitting a town with this shot will not work in a similar manner instead).
    Oh, that is why it's you, it's because you literally claimed it while withholding important information (such as the death tailor).

    WHAT ABOUT YOU DIE
    -vote FM-Earless Artiste

  10. ISO #4160

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    What mislynches have I supported?
    I was on the myopia train day 1, which thanks to comrade turned into a coin flip eyes lynch.
    Day 2 I was on tesseract which at the time everyone else seemed willing to hang if it weren't for the LHF triad red claim.
    and day 3 I was also on tesseract, which was the only train at ALL.
    I guess I should have used singular: "mislynch", although it was a major part of the game over at least two days. Your consensual stance on Tesseract was just that, as far as I remember, a consensual stance; nowhere did you come out with brand new arguments to take them down, or with elaborate thoughts on why they might be scum. If you can prove me wrong, I will gladly reevaluate, though.

  11. ISO #4161

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    I guess I should have used singular: "mislynch", although it was a major part of the game over at least two days. Your consensual stance on Tesseract was just that, as far as I remember, a consensual stance; nowhere did you come out with brand new arguments to take them down, or with elaborate thoughts on why they might be scum. If you can prove me wrong, I will gladly reevaluate, though.
    Yeah I've been mostly coasting this game because every day there's been "Red check this" "Red check that" which have all turned out to be accurate.
    There's a lot of players and I want YOU to imagine yourself trying to lead a town this large on day 1

  12. ISO #4162

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    Yeah I've been mostly coasting this game because every day there's been "Red check this" "Red check that" which have all turned out to be accurate.
    There's a lot of players and I want YOU to imagine yourself trying to lead a town this large on day 1
    Well, I don't have to imagine. I tried to lead the town to lynch Myopia on D1, and then actively tried to get Tesseract lynched by bringing arguments for it. I won't say I have been terribly successful in leading the town, but at least I have tried and that is probably quite apparent when you read my posts. You, on the other hand, seemed quite content with how days were going, considering you didn't try to change how they went much.

  13. ISO #4163

  14. ISO #4164

  15. ISO #4165

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    Well, I don't have to imagine. I tried to lead the town to lynch Myopia on D1, and then actively tried to get Tesseract lynched by bringing arguments for it. I won't say I have been terribly successful in leading the town, but at least I have tried and that is probably quite apparent when you read my posts. You, on the other hand, seemed quite content with how days were going, considering you didn't try to change how they went much.
    Well the days have gone pretty well.
    Neutral killer self detonated day 1.
    Two triad killed day 2.
    Triad killed day 3.

  16. ISO #4166

  17. ISO #4167

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    Well the days have gone pretty well.
    Neutral killer self detonated day 1.
    Two triad killed day 2.
    Triad killed day 3.
    2/3 days were mislynches, and the one day that didn't end with a mislynch was the highly consensual lynch on Inconspicuous, which doesn't really count because it was a scum check noone had any reason to deny. Your answer is not honest lol. When I address days, I obviously mean debates resulting in votes, not weird shenanigans we can't even properly explain that resulted in daykills.

  18. ISO #4168

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    2/3 days were mislynches, and the one day that didn't end with a mislynch was the highly consensual lynch on Inconspicuous, which doesn't really count because it was a scum check noone had any reason to deny. Your answer is not honest lol. When I address days, I obviously mean debates resulting in votes, not weird shenanigans we can't even properly explain that resulted in daykills.
    The days HAVE gone well, we've been burying all the red checks.

  19. ISO #4169

  20. ISO #4170

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    Well, perhaps I am pessimistic, but I mostly see a laundry list of townies in the graveyard and mostly mislynches and confusion. Are you saying you're above all of this?
    Welcome to KRC, where the roles are made up and the rules don't matter.

    And no, I'm not above all of it, what, am I supposed to stop random day kills and the scum night killings? You know how we do that?
    BY BURYING SCUM.

  21. ISO #4171

  22. ISO #4172

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    Welcome to KRC, where the roles are made up and the rules don't matter.

    And no, I'm not above all of it, what, am I supposed to stop random day kills and the scum night killings? You know how we do that?
    BY BURYING SCUM.
    Okayyy.... Who's scum to bury, then? You seem confident and not confused, so you probably have updated reads, right?

  23. ISO #4173

  24. ISO #4174

  25. ISO #4175

  26. ISO #4176

  27. ISO #4177

  28. ISO #4178

  29. ISO #4179

  30. ISO #4180

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    Scum with a miller? Seems kinda, I don't know, redundant?
    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    I like my theory about the order priority better

    IF ANYONE BOTHERED TO READ IT
    I haven't seen it, where is it lol
    That being said...

    ROLES ARE NOT ALIGNMENT INDICATIVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! !!!!!!! If you believe that, you might as well say that a town with a death tailor makes no sense and that Earless is therefore scum.

  31. ISO #4181

  32. ISO #4182

  33. ISO #4183

  34. ISO #4184

  35. ISO #4185

  36. ISO #4186

  37. ISO #4187

  38. ISO #4188

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    Scum with a miller? Seems kinda, I don't know, redundant?
    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    I like my theory about the order priority better

    IF ANYONE BOTHERED TO READ IT
    Now that I have read it, I conclude that both theories are not mutually exclusive... and that you're probably right. That's the best explanation. Because I definetly agree that "I am town" is terribly unambiguous (and if host deems it ambiguous, the dead might as well deem "death" to be ambiguous because they aren't physically dead IRL and start posting lol).

  39. ISO #4189

  40. ISO #4190

  41. ISO #4191

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-CBI Agent View Post
    Six.
    Where are you getting that number?
    Addition. There are six people I think are scum.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Earless Artiste View Post
    So what you're saying is... I'm bussing my teammate myopia? Myopia is scum lol
    Myopia can be town and be absolutely dogshit at the game. Myopia can also be 3p, which I consider to be just as likely. Which ties into my next point:

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    That would make the game 16v6v1v1. Doesn't that feel a little town-favored?
    You're right. It does.

    I think there are likely multiple other 3ps alive.

  42. ISO #4192

  43. ISO #4193

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Earless Artiste View Post
    if we're discussing the realm that there is both mafia and triad, unless you're saying there's 4 triad and 2 mafia, or im bussing myopia, or myopia is not scum... then clearly im legit
    I'm discussing the realm where we aren't in multiball and all of you are triad together.

    I'm saying myopia is either an independent scum or is garbage town.

  44. ISO #4194

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    Myopia can be town and be absolutely dogshit at the game. Myopia can also be 3p, which I consider to be just as likely. Which ties into my next point:
    yeah but thats what im saying... clearly myopia and I aren't aligned and unless you believe me to be a neut, then I can't be scum... regardless if I left out about my death tailor part in my role... that shit is so anti town, Its basically useless

  45. ISO #4195

  46. ISO #4196

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Earless Artiste View Post
    yeah but thats what im saying... clearly myopia and I aren't aligned and unless you believe me to be a neut, then I can't be scum... regardless if I left out about my death tailor part in my role... that shit is so anti town, Its basically useless
    You SPECIFICALLY tried to leave out the death tailor portion of your role in order to appear more towny. For that, you die today. That is not a footnote in this game. It's not a small issue. This is non-negotiable to me. I will not be convinced otherwise.

  47. ISO #4197

  48. ISO #4198

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    You're a 6 man scum team.

    Kitty + Inco + Pain + Tess + Artiste + CBI

    That makes sense to me. Why are you not part of this team?
    So like, what, I'm supposed to have had bussed and advocated for the lynch of three of my teammates? Seems a bit excessive to bus three of your teammates in a blind setup.

  49. ISO #4199

  50. ISO #4200

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    You SPECIFICALLY tried to leave out the death tailor portion of your role in order to appear more towny. For that, you die today. That is not a footnote in this game. It's not a small issue. This is non-negotiable to me. I will not be convinced otherwise.
    I mean, if thats the case... I apologize for my supposed poor judgement... had I realized the role was posted already, I wouldn't have removed it... but anyway, it's another townie lost for you \O/

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •