The feeling is mutual. I was very concerned about you grabbing power D1 though post farming but the things you did then made more sense to me.
Can you explain more why you are pegging players as non-town and not only ignoring it but advocating for their survival?
I also really mean what I said earlier. Why did you not argue that your miller function or my parasite could have impacted the result of the lie detector?
"Let him answer the question tho!" Blah blah, this has already been in thread and purple/tess already had the conversation about it. I read it, it was awful, now you don't have to
i also hate purple and purple accessories but that's a different topic
2 issues here.
Tess did not making that argument. The fact it may be a thing- sure. But the issue is why Tess has not considered and talked about these things in their defense
They also have not talked about how my parasite could have inverted the result of the lie detector. Its not like they don't know about it. We have talked about it quite a bit and my earlier response was to being mentioned specifically to clarify on what I know about the parasite doing.
Consider their thought process. Why would they ignore facts that suggest the read could be wrong and instead take a hard position that Purple is a lying?
Like.. If I was town with a mechanical result claim I am evil I would probably be very vocal about the potential that claim could be wrong if I knew it could be. The fact they have not even made that argument (much less fought hard to bring it up as a potential) speaks more to the mindset of someone caught who knows they were caught and instead wants to discredit the threat.
What do I even say to this.
Imagine a game where people gave 0 reasoning and just said "I think this player is X alignment." Then when asked for why they believe that they respond "What reasoning?"
Like.. I am having trouble thinking of a way to convey how dumb it is to say you have a position but do not have reasoning..
Still feel like u r scum
Valid point btw. Good catch.
If purple scum => leaf and chad scum
Leaf or chad scum=>purple unknown ( but maybe individually scummy, probably?)
Like SOOOOOO many people voted you before
And they are all standing healthy
Eww i just saw
3 users browsing this thread(3 members)
And below just my name
Who tf activated lurking mode in anon game?!
Autmatic sniley conversion.
Good or not? Idk tbh
I think everything is scum VS scum theatre rn
They need to sustain mislims
My point is that the parasite I got flips invest results. So it could be wrong.
To know that we have to sort what Purple sees. Purple also has a form of red check on Tess.
Lynching Incon will likely kill 2 players due to lover connection while lynching either Purple or Tess will only kill 1.
If you think of it mathmatically:
Lynching Purple avoids killing Incon and their lover + Tess meaning we solve 3 slots with 1 lynch
Lynching Tess also reveals if Purple is correct resolving Incon, Their lover and Purple
But lynching Incon kills them + their lover while solving Purple and Tess.
That means you either kill 1 player to solve 3 or you kill 2 players to solve 2. On the most basic level its dumb to go for incon here. We should solve between Purple and Tess or we should wait for outside functions to resolve this conflict. Because of my parasite (and lesser to Tess claiming miller which I no longer believe) we can not rely on investigative functions to break the question of feedback results so I favor lynching or killing between Tess and purple to handle this situation. Of those when disregarding feedback I see Tess as much more scummy though reading.
I mean.. What town player openly reads players as non-town and works to pocket them and advocate for their survival? It might be different if they claimed some feedback to believe town aligned neutral but they are just flat out saying 'I do not think these guys are town and want them to stay alive because they are not town'
(Dont take this personal lag)