S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition - Page 54
Register

User Tag List

Page 54 of 100 FirstFirst ... 4 44 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 64 ... LastLast
Results 2,651 to 2,700 of 4999
  1. ISO #2651

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    The point is to express doubt about my Myopia scumread because I don't know what the hell they are doing anymore. By association, though, if Tesseract flips scum, Myopia probably does too.
    Stop tying me too tesse
    You are tesse scummate and want me to be lynched next
    As your kills dont hold any power against me.
    I once lost a game by being tied by a scummate to a scummate. Lost town lylo.
    Im not doing this misstake again.
    You are scum. Outed

  2. ISO #2652

  3. ISO #2653

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    I thought you were town. My mistake. Move along. How many freaking neutrals are out here? The sad reality is there are towns probably scumreading me. While Purple's garbage is getting away. It's amazing, really.
    The feeling is mutual. I was very concerned about you grabbing power D1 though post farming but the things you did then made more sense to me.

    Can you explain more why you are pegging players as non-town and not only ignoring it but advocating for their survival?
    I also really mean what I said earlier. Why did you not argue that your miller function or my parasite could have impacted the result of the lie detector?

  4. ISO #2654

  5. ISO #2655

  6. ISO #2656

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    The feeling is mutual. I was very concerned about you grabbing power D1 though post farming but the things you did then made more sense to me.

    Can you explain more why you are pegging players as non-town and not only ignoring it but advocating for their survival?
    I also really mean what I said earlier. Why did you not argue that your miller function or my parasite could have impacted the result of the lie detector?
    Purple claimed his LD penetrated millers, fwiw

  7. ISO #2657

  8. ISO #2658

  9. ISO #2659

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Kitty Cat Dance View Post
    The point is that Tesse tried to claim Miller to save themself, and substanciated it with having softed Miller before in their first post. They actually did the opposite and claimed to have been millered half way through the way, but then retracted it. That's not something actually millered players do. it's a lie.
    This

  10. ISO #2660

  11. ISO #2661

  12. ISO #2662

  13. ISO #2663

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Purple View Post
    Let;s chop tesseract and maybe a town vig can kill Inco. Tesseract flipping red will give us tons of info and spew.
    Lets outpost tesseract and lynch inco an(d poison you?)
    Im not sure on you bussing inco anymore tbh.
    But you got sooo much scum equity, but just due to chad and leaf.

  14. ISO #2664

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Inconspicuous Man View Post
    You guys are making me smh my head as of right now.
    We all know smh my head is an ironical saying
    Drop the jokes and prove u r "so town" and purple is wrong.
    Find a bus driver claim n1
    Or claim miller
    Or prove purple is scum making a 1v1 (or 2v1 with commander) trade (which is highly unlikely btw)

  15. ISO #2665

  16. ISO #2666

  17. ISO #2667

  18. ISO #2668

  19. ISO #2669

  20. ISO #2670

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    Purple claimed his LD penetrated millers, fwiw
    2 issues here.

    Tess did not making that argument. The fact it may be a thing- sure. But the issue is why Tess has not considered and talked about these things in their defense

    They also have not talked about how my parasite could have inverted the result of the lie detector. Its not like they don't know about it. We have talked about it quite a bit and my earlier response was to being mentioned specifically to clarify on what I know about the parasite doing.

    Consider their thought process. Why would they ignore facts that suggest the read could be wrong and instead take a hard position that Purple is a lying?

    Like.. If I was town with a mechanical result claim I am evil I would probably be very vocal about the potential that claim could be wrong if I knew it could be. The fact they have not even made that argument (much less fought hard to bring it up as a potential) speaks more to the mindset of someone caught who knows they were caught and instead wants to discredit the threat.

  21. ISO #2671

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Purple View Post
    Tesseract is never doing the lie detect because they are scum.

    I got you two scum today and one yesterday (Mr Bones). I think we can work with thst yah?

    So how not trying to kill me today while im away? Yah? Cool

    Bbl
    Hmm let the council decide your fate

  22. ISO #2672

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mr Bones View Post
    what reasoning? i just think think you're scum
    What do I even say to this.

    Imagine a game where people gave 0 reasoning and just said "I think this player is X alignment." Then when asked for why they believe that they respond "What reasoning?"

    Like.. I am having trouble thinking of a way to convey how dumb it is to say you have a position but do not have reasoning..

  23. ISO #2673

  24. ISO #2674

  25. ISO #2675

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    What do I even say to this.

    Imagine a game where people gave 0 reasoning and just said "I think this player is X alignment." Then when asked for why they believe that they respond "What reasoning?"

    Like.. I am having trouble thinking of a way to convey how dumb it is to say you have a position but do not have reasoning..
    If it matters I am honestly having trouble how this can even be AI. Like.. What scum openly says they have absolutely no reasoning for the position they took..

  26. ISO #2676

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Inconspicuous Man View Post
    Ok guys, I didn’t wanna have to out myself, but I am not lover… *crowd gasps* since I’m town and some of you guys are also probably towns members, I have to reveal myself…. My role is who ever votes me DIES instantly… so I suggest cancel your vote this instant or suffer the consequences..
    What happened to the people already voting you?? They dont look dead tbh.
    This feels like very scummy bullshit claim tbh

  27. ISO #2677

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Myopia View Post
    What happened to the people already voting you?? They dont look dead tbh.
    This feels like very scummy bullshit claim tbh
    Honestly we can say for sure its bullshit. Quite a few people have voted them and did not 'Die instantly'

    Less of a question of 'If' it is bullshit and more of a question to 'why' that bullshit was said.

  28. ISO #2678

  29. ISO #2679

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    Honestly its not just the 'everyone' part that bothers me. Its the 'Knew' part. That is two qualifiers that express certainty as an absolute. Not 'They look like obvious scum' or 'I very strongly believe they are scum' as I would expect when a player draws a conclusion from reasoning. You have not even expressed strong reasoning as to why that player is scum which leads me to believe your position is fabricated.

    Some people are giving you a town pass for revealing as mayor. I think that is dumb in a closed role madness game. One of the roles I thought about submitting was some form of reverse IC to use bastardized mechanics to my advantage. I am not going to consider roles to be AI in any way regardless of what it does.

    Unless you want to tell me you have some other way of having certainty that Inconspicuous is not town I think you slipped in a very AI way.
    Yes
    He knew that because he had tmi

    One scumteam

  30. ISO #2680

  31. ISO #2681

  32. ISO #2682

  33. ISO #2683

  34. ISO #2684

  35. ISO #2685

  36. ISO #2686

  37. ISO #2687

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    Here it is. I hid it pretty well, didn't I?

    Reality and is an illsuon. Good thing you know me, the universe is a hologram. Buy gold, bye! As I awoke, I did not feel like myself. Why not me? I was hurting like during Y2K, I became Mr Pain (or maybe it was the hot sauce I used the night prior). I saw the rising Father and Sun, glowing various colours like a Kaleidoscope, flashing lights like at an Arcade. Due to Myopia, my Eyes couldn't tell what I was seeing. Its SOMETHING. Is that a leaf, why is it Purple? Why do I smell death, has the CBI Agent Mr Bones been hunting again (how dare he leave me here like a pile of Forsaken Bones!?)? How many times do I have to tell him, I'm not Mafia Bro! Still suffering from the hot sauce, Bizarro Pepsi (should have gone with Miller Lite), and that Comrade PickleRadish last night, I quickly wiped myself with Demonic TP and got onto my feet. In the distance, I could make out a blur of what I can only describe as a Dark Unicorn with Blue Beard doing Kitty Cat Dance (talk about a 2-on-1). What Earless Artiste created this world before me? It was as if time and space blended, these creatures and shapes before me became inscribed, along with me, within this Tesseract. ohno! What is happening to me? I used to be an Inconspicuous Man, but with my new powers and riches, the time has come for me to become a Chad Knight!
    Could have used cryptography aswell

  38. ISO #2688

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Blue Beard View Post
    Time to get this game rolling.

    I can day kill inconspicuous but it means I will die at the end of the following night.

    I also have a "bonk hammer":

    Item that can be used to turn someone into an amnesiac. All of: the user of this item, the target of this item, and the role the target remembers as will be publicly announced in the thread.

    So vote tess, kill inconspicuous, bonk another scum read and give them a chance to become confirmed town?
    How can bonkers conf someone town?

  39. ISO #2689

  40. ISO #2690

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Myopia View Post
    Could have used cryptography aswell
    Except to my understanding its against the rules of the game.

    Just curious, your now voting Inconspicuous. Did you see my points on why it makes much less sense to go for them over Purple/Tess or are you ignoring mech feedback claims in favor of your reads?

  41. ISO #2691

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    I don't value Inconspicuous enough to want to lose a person I highly townread to try and solve them. I don't particularly support this.
    Yeah ifafter one out of {tess, purple, incso} flips scum chad is confirmed...
    ... as scum

    Lol made the if after joke in predit
    I think its a funny one

  42. ISO #2692

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    Except to my understanding its against the rules of the game.

    Just curious, your now voting Inconspicuous. Did you see my points on why it makes much less sense to go for them over Purple/Tess or are you ignoring mech feedback claims in favor of your reads?
    I want to proof insco claim wrong

  43. ISO #2693

  44. ISO #2694

  45. ISO #2695

  46. ISO #2696

  47. ISO #2697

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Myopia View Post
    I want to proof insco claim wrong
    My point is that the parasite I got flips invest results. So it could be wrong.

    To know that we have to sort what Purple sees. Purple also has a form of red check on Tess.

    Lynching Incon will likely kill 2 players due to lover connection while lynching either Purple or Tess will only kill 1.

    If you think of it mathmatically:
    Lynching Purple avoids killing Incon and their lover + Tess meaning we solve 3 slots with 1 lynch
    Lynching Tess also reveals if Purple is correct resolving Incon, Their lover and Purple

    But lynching Incon kills them + their lover while solving Purple and Tess.

    That means you either kill 1 player to solve 3 or you kill 2 players to solve 2. On the most basic level its dumb to go for incon here. We should solve between Purple and Tess or we should wait for outside functions to resolve this conflict. Because of my parasite (and lesser to Tess claiming miller which I no longer believe) we can not rely on investigative functions to break the question of feedback results so I favor lynching or killing between Tess and purple to handle this situation. Of those when disregarding feedback I see Tess as much more scummy though reading.

    I mean.. What town player openly reads players as non-town and works to pocket them and advocate for their survival? It might be different if they claimed some feedback to believe town aligned neutral but they are just flat out saying 'I do not think these guys are town and want them to stay alive because they are not town'

  48. ISO #2698

  49. ISO #2699

  50. ISO #2700

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •