I'm going to be posting in Gold because it was impossible to respond with just quoting your post. I tried my best to edit out the useless "ok's and omgs" and respond only to the content. If there is something you want me to clarify or answer that I edited out, let me know.
Oh gee, now I believe that all of the bus drive feedback comes from 2 bus drivers! The true BD shouldn't trust the claim from the interviewee if they're forced into a claim. Absolutely.Originally Posted by The interview
I do not think we have two bus drivers. The bussing of Colmyr to me proves that the interviewee is not the bus driver.
I did not get bus driven. This is a lie.On the first night I swapped Mason and Monroe
- Because Yolo
I do not see why an interviewee would need to lie about this. We were missing a bus claim from day 1, I don't see how this is a lie.
Conveniently drove a target that died and conveniently caused the death of scum. Kalou absolutely deserved town points for not jumping on the Monroe train on day 2.On the third night I swapped Becket and Kalou
- Kalou was full lurker, but gained town points for me by not jumping on the Monroe train on day 2
- Becket was evidently using empty posts to appear relevant
https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showth...297#post320297
This reasoning therefore makes perfect sense.Originally Posted by FM Kalou
Oops.
As you pointed out with your own flair, this reasoning is bad. The bussing of these two seems like a BD, since mafia would not want to kill a corrupt journalist.
Another scum killed thanks to the bus driver! Go you! This is getting more and more likely.On night 4 I swapped Ackerman and Morgan
- Morgan looked scummy to me since the early game
- Ackerman had garnered some accusation and I anticipated the Mafia might kill him to cause confusion.
Twice in a row makes me think Journalist should reveal their target. This is scummy.
Now come the reads, most of which show absolutely solid reasoning.
This could not be used to buy a mafia member some trust for the time being at all. Or create the illusion that the mafia wants the town to trust him... Undecided on this one.FM Ackerman – 100% chance of not being Mafia
It fits with the poor logic that Mafia attempted to attack him. I am not going to trust him over this article though
Conveniently killed by the mafia the next day.FM Ballard – not certain what I think of him after his turn on Parker
Are you implying Parker is a suspect? I think its safe to say Parker is not a savage.
Well I suppose he does.FM Donnelly – seems scummy
I can agree with this
Is that so?FM Earle – I know who this person is, im pretty sure. Clearly town.
Not sure how someone could guess Earles com with how he is posting. Can't say he is clearly town
Same as Ackerman. Include fishy bit about bus driving.FM Kalou – 100% chance of not being Mafia
Fits with poor bus driver logic thinking he saved these people. I don't buy it.
No read on one of the most active contributors? Hello interviewee.FM Mendez – no read
Thanks. But I did not write this interview. I am curious who did and why they have no read on me.
Of course. Make me look like scum some more. Loving it.FM Monroe – likely savage
It could be possible. Bias since I've had fos on you since day 2.
Yep, throw in some anonymous support for Phelps. Handy if he is indeed consort or blackmailer.FM Phelps – town?
If Phelps is truly blackmail/consort then Journalist can reveal who wrote this and give us second scum.
Conclusion:
False reasons for bus driving. Convenient swaps with dead people. What if Cafarelli is consigliere and got swapped on night 3 to ensure any investigative roles would leave her alone after that and this article is supposed to cover for here? Ever think about that?
Also a complete lack of reasons for the reads posted on each individual, which makes them pretty much useless unless you're just trying to manipulate popular opinion to call people suspicious or try to clear people from suspicion because it somehow benefits you.
The reasons for bus driving seems suspect. The swaps with dead people as well. The kill on Becket does not seem the work of a Kidnapper, as I explained earlier. I agree the reads are bad and I am offended you would think I wrote this.
@Cafarelli, please provide a summary of all your feedback INCLUDING what you have not yet revealed to us, thank you!
So Morgan and Ackerman both say the article is a lie.
Ackerman the article says you were bussed n4 though. Are you saying you were not bussed on n4?
I'm trying to think of a reason why someone would lie over the article. Also they used only targets that claimed bussed or were killed. Except for Morgan n1 and Ackerman n3.
@Coroner, (if one exists) I have left a last will including my n1 feedback. Please look it up and use it to catch scum as described, thanks!
What about mafia kidnapper who thinks you are an ally for not claiming feedback, and is using the article to protect you and to get your support in the future?
From the posts you've made during the day, a fair few of those reads do seem to match your opinions on people. Excuse me for finding you suspicious! I will NEVER do it again!Originally Posted by Mendez
Nope. He is disputing the part where the article states that a 5th person (Becket) was bus driven night 3.
BD night 3: Ballard (1), Colmyer (2), Kalou (3), Ackerman (4), Becket (5??)
This makes the article a lie, just like I suspected.
Or drugs. Which makes Cafarelli a liar, because she also claims drugged night 3.
lol I don't mind you finding me suspicious, I do share some of those reads. I find you suspicious myself.
The article could very well be a lie but trying to find a motive behind this lie is what's bothering me. Also kudos for using same wording I used on you the other day. I love holding hands.
@Ackerman - Cafarelli claimed today that he was feedback blocked night 3 and guessed at Cohens role.
She hasn't said it directly but it's implied. Here you go:
https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showth...l=1#post325606
In the first post she was ranting about being drugged "last night," but "last night" she was not. What she probably meant to say was that the roleblockers should've blocked the same targets again because she wasn't drugged night 4, but she was the night 3 when she claimed false feedback on Cohen.5 night, 3 times drugged, 2 real pairings. rose and phelps i checked. so i was accurate only once without a check. that was on cohen. i thought he was a drug dealer actually and took this pairing because with that pairing i figured the most chances to get him lynched. i knew he was scum. that he was actually in the pairing but arso was pure luck. but if i was another scum role i would just have told you that i lied.
replacement here. i've been reading parts of days, but i'll need to do a thorough read. if you have questions for me as i'm reading, just put it in another color, not green. i'll check posts after this every 5 minutes or so.
i SORT of know whats going on.
Cafarelli claimed that he was not interviewed in the Investigator interview a few days ago. That would have suggested that we would have two Investigators that were handy to us and with the drops we have so far thats quickly becoming no reality. Phelps is reacting the exact same way as a legit Escort so far and that earns him some town cred. His feedbacks were promptly given and his feedbacks were spot on thus far. On the flip side Cafarelli told us he lied about Cohen and somehow got it right through pure guessing? Fat chance. The reality is much more likely that he is a Savage/Consig, with Savage more likely, and Ballard was our Town Investigative before the Savages got to him. Drug Dealer is in the game and by all logic would target Cafarelli every chance he got. With the bus Driver seemingly leaving cafarelli alone it looks really suspicious that he claims to have been drugged all of a sudden just after the Savage Investigator dies. His posts turned my way and raged without end to get people to listen to him? No chance being legit here.
It's simple.
Liars are scum and Cafarelli lied.
-vote FM Cafarelli
OH YEAH!
Hey Parker, I am need some insight from you on -
Monroe's hesitance
Cafarelli's connection to Ballard
Ryan's replacement behavior
Earle's sudden contributions.
I'm starting to think that the article writer is an epsilon. Ghost or Jester. All the information is easily claimable except for the n1 bus with monroe and the n3 5 bussings. Both of these nights were missing a bussing. N1 is still missing a bus claim since monroe claims not to be bussed.
I will be back on in a few hours. Got a girl to attend to. Possibly more than a few hours if things go well
After seeing the lists, I'd like to make a comparing Phelps' "Escort target" list to identify the Escort / Consort.
We can tell who were targeted by the consort that way.
When we see the pattern of who were targeted and who were not targeted, we may deduce who the Consort may be while scaling down the number of suspects.
Based on Buch, the list of possible Consort roleblocks are :
Night 1
Galletta
Night 2
Bekowsky
Buchwalter
Night 3
Black
Night 4
Donnelly
If my assumption that the purpose of the article regarding you was either:
- Make you look like confirmed town because they think you're an ally for not claiming feedback
- Make us want to think they did the above, so attention falls on you rather than them after a while of being "confirmed town"
Then you aren't someone they would want to kill. Temporary ally, possible scapegoat for later. Even though Morgan did seem a little scummy, so did you at the start of the game. And Morgan made more redeeming posts than you did before night 4. So in my mind it's more likely that the kill on Morgan was intended. As he was already mostly confirmed to be non-mafia for being blackmailed/drugged.
Just reread the interviews from n2. We need to know who was targeted by the article writer. If it was anyone but the current escort we can confirm that one of the two is scum.
Post #144
I noticed 3 people were roleblocked night 1 and 2, but only 2 people were roleblocked each night after the first two nights.
Do you think an escort got converted night 2?
Is the savage limit of 6 based on living savages, or period?