PSA:
Lynch Pringles, or I replace out.
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
Well, you had a good amount of people jump to and from your train after I posted my initial reads.
Overall I feel like your gameplay this round has been pinging me a bit. Like, you're not doing the "gotcha" thing as frequently. I've seen it perhaps once from you on a remark from Renegade. Everything else seems way too nonchalant.
I'm also pretty cautious about Banana here. Like I said, they're pretty good at feigning frustration and can maintain this with a high post count.
Also while writing this post I just realized Mafia don't have a nightkill. I planned to turbolynch Banana if they were alive tomorrow.
Anyway, yeah. I'm cool with lynching you here.
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
that's not a meta for me. sometimes I am much more or less active on either side. In this case, the game is dead af so I am too. The only people consistently around to talk to, ceko and banana, I have as town reads. You, varcron, naz, superjack, noz, have all been so afk, I can't even force activity out of you because you're straight up not there. Ganelon and renegade I've gotten to talk to a bit, didn't love either of those interactions but at least they had something to say.
If you can't be bothered to play, why should I? I am sapped from too many games where I put in hours and hours trying to solve this shit and then the game gets decided by who we lynch between 3 afks. I only signed because people were begging me.
Here, maybe this will convince you to fucking play?-vote Frinckles
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
Banana's playstyle almost mirrors mine this game. This quote shows him suggesting a policy lynch, which is interesting because I've also been scumreading people for scummy behavior:
BC, you said scumreading people for alignment-indicative behavior is usually hogwash, and that we should look deeper by considering a player's motivation. However, no one would be motivated to leave a vote then AFK at EOD. That person will look scummy no matter what faction they're in. Therefore, you went against your own advice on scumhunting. The quote above shows you're willing to lynch varc for AI behavior.
I am not scum reading Pringles. My vote is 100% a policy lynch. It is unacceptable to a) give a player a pass to lurk because they are a good/popular player, and b) give ANYONE a pass to lurk for "too scummy to be scum"
If we are giving passes to lurkers then why even nother playing?
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
come on frinckles convince us not to lynch you, YOU GREAT ALMIGHTY ONE WHO IS SO ABOVE EVERYBODY ELSE!
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
Infolynching me gives you zero info is one thing I can think of. You'd just backtrack into that group of five I mentioned originally and be lost there while me and Gyrlander post cat memes in the Cat Cave. Which, in a game with power roles for example -- might work. This is a bit more cutthroat than that, however. We don't really have the mislynches to do that.
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
aami vote renegadeUwU
expressur deep-seated lOwOve for me.uVu!!!!!
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
Frinckles shouldn't be lynched just because he does not want to devote the entirety of his free time to filling up the game. What reasoning is this to lynch Frinkles? Its not like Frinkles hasn't contributed.
BC always gets frustrated when things don't go his way. It's NAI, so please don't take it seriously.
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
Forgot to remove my vote before I signed off last night lol [unvote]unvote[unvote] just reading up the past 4 pages