Many of us (Fire, me, Toadette among others) have explained why they discarded their role card. slendermenz just shitposted with "I'm Town" and tried to start a train against Toadette. I know you're new to this site and its meta, but it's not that hard to understand. Toadette gave us three possible reasons why she would have discarded a strong Town card. Whereas slendermenz just chuckles about being suspicious.
None of these things indicate alignment, but I'm more inclined to lynch the person who isn't posting anything of value than the person who is.
Add RLVG to the mix as well as a contributor. I'm sure there are others, but slendermenz is in the rare category of "has posted a lot, but nothing useful at all". That's not where you want to be. If he gets back and starts contributing, I'll consider unvoting, but I think my vote is very appropriate right now.
And you are fine with the role Mason/Doc disposed of and reasoning to back it? This should be the concern...
So what you are basically doing is a policy lynch - Someone hasn't added value to the game as of yet, lynch. I'm sure there are other names who haven't given anything to the game as of yet.
And that's my plan...
However, I do like the fact you named the only 3 people on the wagon and then added 'others'...
And that's my plan...
I'm not 100% fine with it, but Toadette explained her reasoning, which I'm willing to accept for now. Of course, we should keep an eye on her and press her more in the days to come. Far more dangerous are the people we allow to get away with not contributing and trying to throw votes around for no apparent reason.
It's a pressure vote and message to slendermenz -- start contributing or else. At the very least, stop derailing chat with inane posts.
-vote Vedith
Vedith is trying to look town, ergo he is scum.
GG.
Don't pet growlithe, he will bite you.
For anyone who doesn't believe me:
Moderately legitimate post, but I believe ika said we had started. Fine, I guess.
Provides no information -- who wouldn't be claiming Townie right now? Almost like he went out of his way not to include any further information.
Troll post / no value.
Admits he looks suspicious, but doesn't elaborate further or try to indicate why we shouldn't suspect him. Why would you make a post like this and not elaborate. SMH.
Provides summary to Frog, but post that doesn't add much. Stuff had happened by this point. Slight negative in terms of dismissing earlier events.
Flailing type joke post. Not helpful.
Randomly votes Toadette in response to a glib post.
Trolling re: lynch.
Off-topic.
More trolling re: lynch.
Even more trolling re: lynch. Note: He has at no point indicated WHY Toadette should be lynched.
More trolling re: being Town without any further information.
Even more trolling re: lynch.
Even more trolling re: lynch.
Even more trolling re: lynch.
***
Summary: Tons of posts, very little content (if any whatsoever), but managed to incite a lynch train without even giving a reason why he was suspicious of Toadette. And of course, tons of trolling. Overall, disruptive of conversation. I know it's Day 1 so a little trolling is natural, but I want this over-the-top lack of productive posts by slendermenz to stop so we can have a productive game.
Non-controversial proposal: if you're going to vote someone, you should probably explain why. Or else it comes off fishy.
Keep in mind I'm not voting Toadette because of what Slender has said, I'm voting because I think there was scum motive to the throw away.
I don't see Slender's play as scum motive but rather piss around null.
I'm not going to vote someone for a null action rather than a scum action. It's always good to have 2 active wagons anyway.
And that's my plan...
Btw, keep note that FB unvoted Slender to put Toadette into the lead.
And that's my plan...
Also, there's a bit of recent meta around this site where certain players deliberately act incapable to get people to discount them as threats, but of course end up being scum. I.e. I don't want to give slendermenz a pass simply because he's trying to act like a clueless townie. That has caused the Town to lose in two recent games (Yuki/ika in Camp Mafia and Stealth in Prime Minister).
I worded incorrectly...
Btw, keep note that FB unvoted Slender which put Toadette into the lead.
I can see FB doing this for town cred it Toadette is lynched, either flip.
And that's my plan...
I'm available for 5 minutes.
Summary Please.
This setup is 50%+50% random. Every player receives two roles that they can pick between, discarding one and keep the other.
The roles that's received are entirely random.
This is the role that Toadette discarded.
Town Mason/Doctor (36)
You are a Town Mason/Doctor.
Abilities
During the Day, you may vote for whomever you want lynched.
Mason: If there are other Masons in the game, you will form a Mason group with them. There will be a Mason QT that can be used pre-game and during the Night.
Doctor: During the Night, you may PM me the name of another player. This player will be protected from all nightkills for that Night.
Win Condition
You win when all threats to the Town are eliminated and at least one Town-aligned player is still alive, or nothing can prevent the same.
Seriously, that's one of the most powerful town roles and you discarded it.
You are a Doctor + a Mason with another that's confirmed Town together with you. AND YOU DISCARD IT IN FAVOR OF ANOTHER ROLE!!!
With the randomness, the chance of you behind scum are high, perhaps for the thrill of it.
I really doubt there's a different role that you would favor as town, over the Mason/Doctor combo.
:toad:
Spoiler : O.o :