Galloway, if you know anything about me, I don't ruin other peoples gambits nor try to undo certain wifom they set up. I never said I accept Lichtmanns words, but so far, he hasn't said anything to trigger a negative reaction, so I'm letting him play out his plan.
And one question I rarely answer is how I feel about other people, I don't like alerting people to what I'm looking into so that they can divert or cover things up. Same reason police don't answer much questions in on-going investigations.
I'm here. I went away but now I'm back and nothing else matters.
Sorry to leave but Im leavin.
Classes n stoof.
Back from looking through posts.
Bekowsky: I find it odd for him on day one says interesting night and leaves a vote. Today he pretty much does the same thing. For me its not much that I can base it off. But combined with the lurking I might consider him potential mafia (consig maybe). Like any mafia (look at any game that has congis) They always make a code. Here he might be trying to play consig under the radar but making one or two posts to tell mafia what he found and then just wait for nightfall.
Fontaine (correct spelling): I find it funny he's play the "new guy" card. I think everyone here knows how to do the commands that he said he couldn't do. Really for me theres not much I can see from it. He could be a lazy delta who's like "fuck this time to noob it up" or a PR, or maybe even a delta who's trying to take a bullet
Of all the players, for some reason FM Rose has had my eye twitching at her. I mean, I find her adorable and all, but I never find anything meaningful about her posts, just an excuse to blend in.
As for Acker and Licht; They seem to purposely want to attract attention, something scum should avoid.
guys we need to lynch cohen. lynch that liar!!
and also, i think if the interview was from an invest, he would rather say: night 1 i checked this guy and according to the result and my reads he's probably town
that would at least be somewhat useful
I'm not 100% on lynch but I will add some pressure. I do find it funny how he did accept my reason so easily. I would expect everyone to question it or inquire.
-vote FM Cohen
My reads on you are that you easy FoS. If anything it makes me distrust you more. I agree with you about Cohen, but you have to step into his shoes as well:
Do you really think he would lie on Day 1 knowing that he would have lost most credibility through-out the game? Unless of course the Doc was nice enough to waste his heal on hi,, thus clearing his name. If that was his intent, he would have been cleared off the mafia list, and thought of a townie. But that hypo plan failed if it existed.
I'm not so quick to judge Cohen, but it still draws suspicion and needs to be check.
That letter don't look like it sounds.
My spelling is bad.... This handsome devils needs to sleep at some point in the near and far future.
Life.... It just keeps throw those fireballs at you. Isn't time to catch one?
yes.
i don't easy FoS ppl. i have solid evidence. i'm thinking about revealing it all but is has a huge drawback
he thought it's safe to lie because he know he has a drug dealer and could easily claim drugged. his plan was to look like a townie because mafia members usually arent drugged^^
Depends on the player, scum that know how to talk with a strong voice want the attention so that in day chat, they can steer the conversation in a direction favorable to them.
(looks at my post count and all the attention I've gathered)
hmm... a town player who knows how to talk with a strong voice wants attention to rob it away from scum, and try to start uncomfortable conversations that the scum want to suppress.
Some things that I'd like to look into that I brought up yesterday but somehow got shelved are:
reply 200 - no one tried to follow up on this, in fact Colmyer suppressed it by re-enforcing that he was sure that all 3 roleblocks were genuine due to them saying they got non standard feedback. What wasn't even looked into is that they could have gotten non standard feedback from something else like their own role and not to mention that once the topic started, some people had time to be alerted not to claim standard feedback.
reply 366 - Bishop thinks someone lied about bus claim, again, no one followed up.
(I'll reply to Cafarelli's new post soon)
Such delightful information you slipped, this should hopefully mark two off my list.
As for my FoS' based on Day 1 and some Day 2 chatter, Mr. Beautiful lists them as Rose, Mason, Monroe, and the very near future Colmyer.
Currently reading...
Nothing happenned to me.
Colmyer is annoying
OMG 2 journalist article.
That's what I can say so far. Will be back after reading all them posts.
I was talking about bad attention. What has been said was trolly and seemed fairly scummy.
I agree with Bishop, but how do you follow up? We can push for more info(which is why Mason is on my list), but there are three so it makes it more difficult.
I believed this was evidence that would blossom at a later time.
If you claim you have solid evidence, then you must be ready to commit to a role claim. Not sure what evidence you have or how solid it is, so I might as well wait until you cough it up, I've tried answering most of your questions, pressure or no pressure isn't going to change what I'll say or won't say.
So you will only talk if he outs his role? Thats quite scummy of you to do. PR can get lynches without explicitly stating it because other people understand either
A) their role
B) their reasoning
C) they see the scum slips
or
D) one or more of the above
pick your choice
I'm willing to talk now, as I have been.. what would you like me to say? Would you like me to say why I think Lichtmann wrote in invisible ink? Would you like me to tell the mafia who I think is scum so that they can feed off of it and possibly cause another mislynch if I'm wrong? What do you want to hear?
The only thing I'm accused of is that I'm scum that lied about poison... I can't prove either way, so pressure isn't going to change that.
Withholding vital information is sometimes necessary.
Withholding opinions is unneeded.
masons claim was solid imo, he waited for 2 to claim to help the busdriver
and cohen, as i said it's solid. and yes, if i tell it i'll have to reveal my role aswell probably. which wouldn't be good of course.
if people trust me and vote, then fine. if not i'll give you the evidence
Please explain why you are afraid of listing of who you believe is scum? Many others has done it, so why would it scare you?
Can't think of targets that's deaths would benefit you the most? My little angel, I'm falling in love with you.
Tell me about the mafia and why you think they are mafia. Mafia is only a size of 5. Even if you say X, Y, Z is mafia. The mafia would have to have huge discrediting and discrimination against that person. Day 1 is more of an exception of that. But as days go on they will have a harder time discrediting towns due to the fact that several days have gone by and we have people who can help solidify their defense or they can use past things to defend themselves. In short run it might work for mafia, but in the long run it will only hurt them.
@ Cafarelli, just the fact that you claimed you have evidence tells scum you are a investigative PR. Why not just come out all the way, you pretty much have nothing left to hide. I don't know what you think I am, or what you want from me.
I know I have nothing to hide and I'm calling your bluff, I know you don't have any evidence against me because there is none to be had.
You shouldn't be here. It's not right.
Have to agree with Cohen, it's a little late to hide now that you let it slip. It's now more beneficial for town if you reveal exactly what your role is to counter others as well as helping prove/disprove whether you yourself are mafia.
Je etait role-blocked. Don't have time to post more:\
If anyone cares, I think Mason is scummy. Can't explain it, but just a thought.