Day 2 - Page 5
Register

User Tag List

Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 250 of 908

Thread: Day 2

  1. ISO #201

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Lichtmann View Post
    If you know my COM name you know my reasoning.

    I will go find Ackerman and fontane (whatever the spelling is) and see what I think Mr. [retracted COM name]
    Its highly unlikely anyone here actually knows my COM. So if you go congrats. Get a worthless cookie for figuring out some useless information.
    Noting you refused to answer my first question.

  2. ISO #202

  3. ISO #203

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Galloway View Post
    ]Reasonings or not I want to hear why you typed in invisi text instead of normal.
    Whatcha think about Akcermann and fontane if thats how you spell it.

    Cohen why are you so eager to casualy accept this guys words?
    It is just as possible that Litch is blackmailor and faked it for a day and has now blackmailed someone.
    Also, the lynch on McKelty was indeed fast because it took the entire amount of time we have avaliable in the day chat. funny that.
    But he had tons of options to remove pressure that he chose not to. Hinderence to town to those who can't be bothered to try. But i digress.

    What do you feel on chapman Cohen?
    Galloway, if you know anything about me, I don't ruin other peoples gambits nor try to undo certain wifom they set up. I never said I accept Lichtmanns words, but so far, he hasn't said anything to trigger a negative reaction, so I'm letting him play out his plan.

    And one question I rarely answer is how I feel about other people, I don't like alerting people to what I'm looking into so that they can divert or cover things up. Same reason police don't answer much questions in on-going investigations.

  4. ISO #204

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cohen View Post
    Galloway, if you know anything about me, I don't ruin other peoples gambits nor try to undo certain wifom they set up. I never said I accept Lichtmanns words, but so far, he hasn't said anything to trigger a negative reaction, so I'm letting him play out his plan.

    And one question I rarely answer is how I feel about other people, I don't like alerting people to what I'm looking into so that they can divert or cover things up. Same reason police don't answer much questions in on-going investigations.
    Answering to reporters is nowhere near the same as giving a read on someone.

  5. ISO #205

  6. ISO #206

  7. ISO #207

  8. ISO #208

  9. ISO #209

    Re: Day 2

    Back from looking through posts.

    Bekowsky: I find it odd for him on day one says interesting night and leaves a vote. Today he pretty much does the same thing. For me its not much that I can base it off. But combined with the lurking I might consider him potential mafia (consig maybe). Like any mafia (look at any game that has congis) They always make a code. Here he might be trying to play consig under the radar but making one or two posts to tell mafia what he found and then just wait for nightfall.

    Fontaine (correct spelling): I find it funny he's play the "new guy" card. I think everyone here knows how to do the commands that he said he couldn't do. Really for me theres not much I can see from it. He could be a lazy delta who's like "fuck this time to noob it up" or a PR, or maybe even a delta who's trying to take a bullet

  10. ISO #210

  11. ISO #211

  12. ISO #212

  13. ISO #213

  14. ISO #214

  15. ISO #215

  16. ISO #216

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cafarelli View Post
    guys we need to lynch cohen. lynch that liar!!

    and also, i think if the interview was from an invest, he would rather say: night 1 i checked this guy and according to the result and my reads he's probably town

    that would at least be somewhat useful
    My reads on you are that you easy FoS. If anything it makes me distrust you more. I agree with you about Cohen, but you have to step into his shoes as well:

    Do you really think he would lie on Day 1 knowing that he would have lost most credibility through-out the game? Unless of course the Doc was nice enough to waste his heal on hi,, thus clearing his name. If that was his intent, he would have been cleared off the mafia list, and thought of a townie. But that hypo plan failed if it existed.

    I'm not so quick to judge Cohen, but it still draws suspicion and needs to be check.

  17. ISO #217

  18. ISO #218

  19. ISO #219

  20. ISO #220

  21. ISO #221

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Colmyer View Post
    No.
    yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Black View Post
    My reads on you are that you easy FoS. If anything it makes me distrust you more. I agree with you about Cohen, but you have to step into his shoes as well:

    Do you really think he would lie on Day 1 knowing that he would have lost most credibility through-out the game? Unless of course the Doc was nice enough to waste his heal on hi,, thus clearing his name. If that was his intent, he would have been cleared off the mafia list, and thought of a townie. But that hypo plan failed if it existed.

    I'm not so quick to judge Cohen, but it still draws suspicion and needs to be check.
    i don't easy FoS ppl. i have solid evidence. i'm thinking about revealing it all but is has a huge drawback
    he thought it's safe to lie because he know he has a drug dealer and could easily claim drugged. his plan was to look like a townie because mafia members usually arent drugged^^

  22. ISO #222

  23. ISO #223

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Black View Post
    As for Acker and Licht; They seem to purposely want to attract attention, something scum should avoid.
    Depends on the player, scum that know how to talk with a strong voice want the attention so that in day chat, they can steer the conversation in a direction favorable to them.

    (looks at my post count and all the attention I've gathered)

    hmm... a town player who knows how to talk with a strong voice wants attention to rob it away from scum, and try to start uncomfortable conversations that the scum want to suppress.

    Some things that I'd like to look into that I brought up yesterday but somehow got shelved are:

    reply 200 - no one tried to follow up on this, in fact Colmyer suppressed it by re-enforcing that he was sure that all 3 roleblocks were genuine due to them saying they got non standard feedback. What wasn't even looked into is that they could have gotten non standard feedback from something else like their own role and not to mention that once the topic started, some people had time to be alerted not to claim standard feedback.

    reply 366 - Bishop thinks someone lied about bus claim, again, no one followed up.

    (I'll reply to Cafarelli's new post soon)

  24. ISO #224

  25. ISO #225

  26. ISO #226

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cohen View Post
    Depends on the player, scum that know how to talk with a strong voice want the attention so that in day chat, they can steer the conversation in a direction favorable to them.

    (looks at my post count and all the attention I've gathered)
    I was talking about bad attention. What has been said was trolly and seemed fairly scummy.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cohen View Post
    reply 366 - Bishop thinks someone lied about bus claim, again, no one followed up.
    I agree with Bishop, but how do you follow up? We can push for more info(which is why Mason is on my list), but there are three so it makes it more difficult.
    I believed this was evidence that would blossom at a later time.

  27. ISO #227

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cafarelli View Post
    i don't easy FoS ppl. i have solid evidence. i'm thinking about revealing it all but is has a huge drawback
    he thought it's safe to lie because he know he has a drug dealer and could easily claim drugged. his plan was to look like a townie because mafia members usually arent drugged^^
    If you claim you have solid evidence, then you must be ready to commit to a role claim. Not sure what evidence you have or how solid it is, so I might as well wait until you cough it up, I've tried answering most of your questions, pressure or no pressure isn't going to change what I'll say or won't say.

  28. ISO #228

  29. ISO #229

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Black View Post
    I was talking about bad attention. What has been said was trolly and seemed fairly scummy.


    I agree with Bishop, but how do you follow up? We can push for more info(which is why Mason is on my list), but there are three so it makes it more difficult.
    I believed this was evidence that would blossom at a later time.
    Let the flower ripen, don't pressure Mason yet imo. If he screwed up, it will shirley bare it fangs back on him in the very near future. Let evidence stack and stick with the bigger fish.

  30. ISO #230

  31. ISO #231

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cohen View Post
    If you claim you have solid evidence, then you must be ready to commit to a role claim. Not sure what evidence you have or how solid it is, so I might as well wait until you cough it up, I've tried answering most of your questions, pressure or no pressure isn't going to change what I'll say or won't say.
    So you will only talk if he outs his role? Thats quite scummy of you to do. PR can get lynches without explicitly stating it because other people understand either

    A) their role
    B) their reasoning
    C) they see the scum slips
    or
    D) one or more of the above

    pick your choice

  32. ISO #232

  33. ISO #233

  34. ISO #234

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Lichtmann View Post
    So you will only talk if he outs his role? Thats quite scummy of you to do. PR can get lynches without explicitly stating it because other people understand either

    A) their role
    B) their reasoning
    C) they see the scum slips
    or
    D) one or more of the above

    pick your choice
    I'm willing to talk now, as I have been.. what would you like me to say? Would you like me to say why I think Lichtmann wrote in invisible ink? Would you like me to tell the mafia who I think is scum so that they can feed off of it and possibly cause another mislynch if I'm wrong? What do you want to hear?

  35. ISO #235

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cohen View Post
    I'm willing to talk now, as I have been.. what would you like me to say? Would you like me to say why I think Lichtmann wrote in invisible ink? Would you like me to tell the mafia who I think is scum so that they can feed off of it and possibly cause another mislynch if I'm wrong? What do you want to hear?
    Yes, please state why you think Licht brought in inviso text.

    I also would like your list of scum

  36. ISO #236

  37. ISO #237

  38. ISO #238

  39. ISO #239

  40. ISO #240

  41. ISO #241

  42. ISO #242

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cohen View Post
    I'm willing to talk now, as I have been.. what would you like me to say? Would you like me to say why I think Lichtmann wrote in invisible ink? Would you like me to tell the mafia who I think is scum so that they can feed off of it and possibly cause another mislynch if I'm wrong? What do you want to hear?
    Tell me about the mafia and why you think they are mafia. Mafia is only a size of 5. Even if you say X, Y, Z is mafia. The mafia would have to have huge discrediting and discrimination against that person. Day 1 is more of an exception of that. But as days go on they will have a harder time discrediting towns due to the fact that several days have gone by and we have people who can help solidify their defense or they can use past things to defend themselves. In short run it might work for mafia, but in the long run it will only hurt them.

  43. ISO #243

    Re: Day 2

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cafarelli View Post
    masons claim was solid imo, he waited for 2 to claim to help the busdriver

    and cohen, as i said it's solid. and yes, if i tell it i'll have to reveal my role aswell probably. which wouldn't be good of course.
    if people trust me and vote, then fine. if not i'll give you the evidence
    The problem is, if what you say is true: you may have already revealed too much information.

  44. ISO #244

    Re: Day 2

    @ Cafarelli, just the fact that you claimed you have evidence tells scum you are a investigative PR. Why not just come out all the way, you pretty much have nothing left to hide. I don't know what you think I am, or what you want from me.

    I know I have nothing to hide and I'm calling your bluff, I know you don't have any evidence against me because there is none to be had.

  45. ISO #245

  46. ISO #246

  47. ISO #247

  48. ISO #248

  49. ISO #249

  50. ISO #250

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •