Day 1: First Blood - Page 8
Register

User Tag List

Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 400 of 629
  1. ISO #351

  2. ISO #352

  3. ISO #353

  4. ISO #354

  5. ISO #355

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Mr T View Post
    it seems like a waste of time.
    Haha. Poor Pinkie got shot down just like that.

    In an effort to hide the PR's better, we could work in a buddy system where 4 or 5 people would post the same hypo.
    The downside to that is PR's would need to hypo earlier to not be forced into a grouping that they don't want, mafia could influence the groups, etc.
    I can't think of a way to fix the plan at this moment.
    So I'm Anti-Hypo for now until it gets revised. As much as I don't want to lose a PR and not get info, I'd rather that than have them all picked off one by one. Especially considering we have like..8.

  6. ISO #356

  7. ISO #357

  8. ISO #358

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    The purpose of the hypo plan is to counter the loss of information to town due to the no last wills mechanic. There are pros and cons to this plan that people have obviously brought up, and I guess it just comes down to whether we feel like it's worth the risk of possibly revealing pr's in order to actually make sure we collect the night action results. In practice, I have originally seen it just used to reveal sheriff results, but I figured why not extend it to all PR's.

    I personally am pro-plan, in it's most minimal form.

  9. ISO #359

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Pinkie Pie View Post
    I'm in an anti-hypo time zone. I'll wait till the pro-hypos wake up.

    Still don't understand how town power can be exposed.
    I think people are talking about if I hypo claim sheriff with a guilty on say, 5 mafia members in a row, then the mafia know I'm the real sheriff, thus exposing a town power role.

  10. ISO #360

  11. ISO #361

  12. ISO #362

  13. ISO #363

  14. ISO #364

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Agahnim View Post
    Fantastic. I am back.

    I am pro-plan only if the others are pro-plan as well.
    Its an all or nothing deal
    Wow, the pro-hypos are wavering. What is this?

    Quote Originally Posted by FM King Tut View Post
    Your pharaoh has arrived, peons. Pardon your excellency while I read the 200+ replies.
    You avatar shows FM Queen Tit.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Michigan J Frog View Post
    I think people are talking about if I hypo claim sheriff with a guilty on say, 5 mafia members in a row, then the mafia know I'm the real sheriff, thus exposing a town power role.
    What scummy logic is that?

  15. ISO #365

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Michigan J Frog View Post
    I think people are talking about if I hypo claim sheriff with a guilty on say, 5 mafia members in a row, then the mafia know I'm the real sheriff, thus exposing a town power role.
    Yea this. But less excessively.
    M.J.Frog and 2 others sheriff hypo Jack Sparrow
    The next day we lynch him and he flips mafia.
    The mafia can assume that 1 of you may actually be sheriff. And over time this accumulates to them finding out roles.
    Especially with escort/jailor claims and even blacksmith claims.
    I know it's a stretch, but I'm more worried about the escort/jailor hypos. If we take out those two then I would probably reconsider my vote.

  16. ISO #366

  17. ISO #367

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Locutus View Post
    Yea this. But less excessively.
    M.J.Frog and 2 others sheriff hypo Jack Sparrow
    The next day we lynch him and he flips mafia.
    The mafia can assume that 1 of you may actually be sheriff. And over time this accumulates to them finding out roles.
    Especially with escort/jailor claims and even blacksmith claims.
    I know it's a stretch, but I'm more worried about the escort/jailor hypos. If we take out those two then I would probably reconsider my vote.
    This setup has a confirmed framer. It might be wise to not try to give them ideas how to use their night actions. Also i suggest every Town PR to not waste their actions on me and check the lurky people.
    Business as usual.

  18. ISO #368

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Sherlock is here and accustomed.

    Seriously, so many posts in the first 5 hours... I barely managed to catch up.

    And Jack Sparrow, for me everyone is guilty - you, those people who are voting you, and those people who don't belive people that are voting Jack Sparrow. The only person I can trust is myself.

  19. ISO #369

  20. ISO #370

  21. ISO #371

  22. ISO #372

  23. ISO #373

  24. ISO #374

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM King Tut View Post
    Nawt gunna lye. I just skimmed thro the ate pages. Useless shit. Hypo plan is shit. It's like saying "Hear I'm usefool for trying. In reality thiss plan dosnt do shit"
    Yes, it does. It provides a way for town to uncover "last will" type information from our town pr roles if they were to die before making their grand role claim and reveal. I would hardly say it's useless. Risky, yes. Useless no. There are pros and cons that can be debated, and I would prefer that we do some variation of this plan. However if most people would rather we don't do this, then that's fine... Just don't be sad if some PR dies without telling us any of his night action results.

  25. ISO #375

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Michigan J Frog View Post
    Yes, it does. It provides a way for town to uncover "last will" type information from our town pr roles if they were to die before making their grand role claim and reveal. I would hardly say it's useless. Risky, yes. Useless no. There are pros and cons that can be debated, and I would prefer that we do some variation of this plan. However if most people would rather we don't do this, then that's fine... Just don't be sad if some PR dies without telling us any of his night action results.
    It only works if we take the claims at face value and even then if the Sheriff/PRs themselves die.

  26. ISO #376

  27. ISO #377

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    If a sheriff dies w/o leaving a last will, we can look back on previous days and study what players he was casting suspicion on. Same goes for RB's that escorts think were significant, etc.

    The point of a discussion-heavy, cit-based game of mafia is to continually reevaluate information, communication, votes, etc. in light of new things that arise later on. If a sheriff dies, we'll learn a lot just from having his role confirmed.

    The risk, I think, is nowhere near worth the relatively meager potential reward. (I also think that people are underestimating just how great the risk is. Day 1, mafia can throw out all people who hypo incorrect "guilty" results and focus on the handful who have true positives. Day 2 the mafia can winnow that list down even further... Very, very quickly they'll have a tiny & accurate list of our sheriffs. Have you ever seen the "Akinator" website? It's the same principle.)

  28. ISO #378

  29. ISO #379

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Watson View Post
    What is does is it provides a type of last will, but prevents any kind of action from taking place UNTIL the PR is dead...so basically the PR has to kill themselves just to prove a point. What good is that? It's as if your trying to reduce the PR numbers
    What makes me afraid most is the OVER COMPLEXITY which means that we might get sidetracked and would just makes it more difficult to scumhunt.

  30. ISO #380

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Michigan J Frog View Post
    Yes, it does. It provides a way for town to uncover "last will" type information from our town pr roles if they were to die before making their grand role claim and reveal. I would hardly say it's useless. Risky, yes. Useless no. There are pros and cons that can be debated, and I would prefer that we do some variation of this plan. However if most people would rather we don't do this, then that's fine... Just don't be sad if some PR dies without telling us any of his night action results.
    So pretty much it's players playing normally without last wills? Sounds liek a grate plan.

  31. ISO #381

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Gandalf View Post
    Day 1, mafia can throw out all people who hypo incorrect "guilty" results and focus on the handful who have true positives.
    In case it wasn't clear, the mafia can also throw out all hypos that incorrectly call a mafia member innocent. (Obviously they wouldn't know anything about sk, & vice versa, but the point is the mafia is still getting a lot of info from the hypos.)

  32. ISO #382

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Watson View Post
    What is does is it provides a type of last will, but prevents any kind of action from taking place UNTIL the PR is dead...so basically the PR has to kill themselves just to prove a point. What good is that? It's as if your trying to reduce the PR numbers
    No, a PR does not have to die to reveal themselves. They can reveal at any time. I don't see how the proposed plan precludes that at all.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cookie Monster View Post
    What makes me afraid most is the OVER COMPLEXITY which means that we might get sidetracked and would just makes it more difficult to scumhunt.
    Ok, I think this is a huge and legitimate concern that I hadn't considered. I don't really have a good rebuttal to this flaw in the plan.

    If the general consensus seems to be that we do not care about last wills, then we should all just plan to adjust our play accordingly. Seems to me though that people here are rather lazy and would rather have solid night action claims generated by the hypo-claims to refer to upon the death of a PR than re-reading the day threads for clues. It's all just a matter of personal opinion.

  33. ISO #383

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Gandalf View Post
    In case it wasn't clear, the mafia can also throw out all hypos that incorrectly call a mafia member innocent. (Obviously they wouldn't know anything about sk, & vice versa, but the point is the mafia is still getting a lot of info from the hypos.)
    Yeah, this is why you don't hypo JUST cop results. However if we're hypo'ing sheriff claims, doctor claims, and other roles without feedback then even if someone is proven to be NOT sheriff that doesn't mean they are NOT doctor. Just because someone is NOT a sheriff doesn't mean they are NOT a PR with results that they wish to convey.

  34. ISO #384

  35. ISO #385

  36. ISO #386

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Michigan J Frog View Post
    Yeah, this is why you don't hypo JUST cop results. However if we're hypo'ing sheriff claims, doctor claims, and other roles without feedback then even if someone is proven to be NOT sheriff that doesn't mean they are NOT doctor.
    I don't understand how this helps. This just means that the mafia gets more information in addition to finding out who our sheriffs are!

  37. ISO #387

  38. ISO #388

  39. ISO #389

  40. ISO #390

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Phew, read most of the thread. However, the only posts which I was obsessing about the entire time were the 2 posts made by Robin Hood during the first 50 posts of the game.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Robin Hood View Post
    Geez, day one, and we're already pointing fingers. If I didn't know better, I'd say that all of you are scum.
    Okay, does no one else see the total extreme scummyness in this post? He is saying that "pointing fingers" (aka: Scumhunting) is only done by scum. He is actively DISCOURAGING scumhunting. Seriously, that is around the scummyest thing I've ever read in an FM game.


    Well apparently I wasn't the only person to take note of that post this day....

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Inspector Cluseau View Post
    Look at this scum...(Referring to Robin Hood's post)
    Early post made within the first hour of the game. Early accusation against scummyness of Hood. Nothing too hardcore. Now let's see Robin’s response...

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Robin Hood View Post
    You know what? You're really getting on my nerves.
    Reactions are very important when it comes to scumhunting, and I believe as far as scummy reactions go, this is top tier. Cluseau believes that Hood’s post is scummy. He accuses Hood as scum. Hood’s response isn’t only a “You’re making me annoyed” post, but borderline threat. If my dad said “You know what? You're really getting on my nerves.” I’d interpret that as a “Shut up or things are going to get ugly”. Therefore, I would say that this is a veiled threat.

    The rest of Hoods posts aren’t too interesting. However, despite posting A LOT, he has ultimately contributed next to nothing. Active lurking is when someone posts a lot, but has minimal helpful content in those posts. I would say this is definitely active lurking. Active lurking = very scummy.

    I firmly believe that we are more likely to find scum by finding major scummy slip-ups instead of not approving of the overall game-tactics of a player. Hoods first posts are incredibly scummy. His posts since then have contributed little, and seem like those of one who simply wants to blend in. With D1, the amount of information is limited. However, in my opinion Hood is the most scummy player. Therefore…

    -vote FM Robin Hood

  41. ISO #391

  42. ISO #392

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Ceasar View Post
    Reactions are very important when it comes to scumhunting
    -vote FM Robin Hood
    No. If I've learned anything from playing FM in the past, it's that things like emotional tone/reactions are terrible indicators of alignment. "Schumhunting" based on that alone distracts the town, kills innocent players, and lets savvy scum manipulate you by playing it cool.

    Inspector Cluseau was getting on my nerves early in the thread, too.

    We'll learn a lot more by paying attention to things like voting patterns, tunnel vision, and the like. Not issues like getting annoyed at annoying behavior.

  43. ISO #393

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Jack Sparrow View Post
    I fail to see any reveal of Pinky Pie. Do you have bonus information we don't have?
    He had posted a few times before and yet now reveals a "gut read" on someone who has not posted yet.
    And instead of saying why he instead says with conviction that someone is "guilty"

    The words "guilty" after it was brought up that sheriffs can use the words guilty/innocent to reveal info is telling.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Gandalf View Post
    No. If I've learned anything from playing FM in the past, it's that things like emotional tone/reactions are terrible indicators of alignment. "Schumhunting" based on that alone distracts the town, kills innocent players, and lets savvy scum manipulate you by playing it cool.

    Inspector Cluseau was getting on my nerves early in the thread, too.

    We'll learn a lot more by paying attention to things like voting patterns, tunnel vision, and the like. Not issues like getting annoyed at annoying behavior.
    I agree with this.
    Very good post.

  44. ISO #394

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Gandalf View Post
    No. If I've learned anything from playing FM in the past, it's that things like emotional tone/reactions are terrible indicators of alignment. "Schumhunting" based on that alone distracts the town, kills innocent players, and lets savvy scum manipulate you by playing it cool.

    Inspector Cluseau was getting on my nerves early in the thread, too.

    We'll learn a lot more by paying attention to things like voting patterns, tunnel vision, and the like. Not issues like getting annoyed at annoying behavior.
    This is partially true. If you have access to meta you can lynch scum with that. The quality of scum plays suffered greatly over the last couple of FM's. Meta dictates me that the players with a low post count are high likely to be scum. All our 1 post wonders are pretty good candidates for pressure votes.

  45. ISO #395

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Gandalf View Post
    No. If I've learned anything from playing FM in the past, it's that things like emotional tone/reactions are terrible indicators of alignment. "Schumhunting" based on that alone distracts the town, kills innocent players, and lets savvy scum manipulate you by playing it cool.

    Inspector Cluseau was getting on my nerves early in the thread, too.

    We'll learn a lot more by paying attention to things like voting patterns, tunnel vision, and the like. Not issues like getting annoyed at annoying behavior.
    You know that you just betitled yourself as scum player right? ;)

  46. ISO #396

  47. ISO #397

  48. ISO #398

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Frog's idea is in its core not a bad idea. It's just too hard to implement it efficiently. Frog clearly invested already more time in this game than most of the other people did. This implies that he has to keep it like that for the rest of the game or people will start to call him out as scum.

    I have a strong town read on him. The plan has flaws but in the end he lead to a more cultivated form of dialogue on this Day 1 which is a good thing.

    All i remember about Wolverine is his avatar. I have no reads on him. Which doesn't imply anything.


    The better question is. Where are those roleblocks?

  49. ISO #399

    Re: Day 1: First Blood

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Jack Sparrow View Post
    Frog's idea is in its core not a bad idea. It's just too hard to implement it efficiently. Frog clearly invested already more time in this game than most of the other people did. This implies that he has to keep it like that for the rest of the game or people will start to call him out as scum.

    I have a strong town read on him. The plan has flaws but in the end he lead to a more cultivated form of dialogue on this Day 1 which is a good thing.

    All i remember about Wolverine is his avatar. I have no reads on him. Which doesn't imply anything.


    The better question is. Where are those roleblocks?
    The Rb targets probably are ppl not posted yet/one of them is SK.
    It would explain the one death better.
    I actually feel the best thing to do is wait for everyone to post before making definitive statements.
    Contradicted himself

  50. ISO #400

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Day 9: Blood Thirsty
    By Forum Mafia GM in forum Forum Mafia XIX
    Replies: 308
    Last Post: September 22nd, 2013, 05:16 PM
  2. Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon
    By Necroplant in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 5th, 2013, 04:53 PM
  3. M-FM The Festival of Blood.
    By Elixir in forum Setup Workshop
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: July 24th, 2012, 08:24 AM
  4. Day II: No Blood on Our Hands
    By Elixir in forum Main Threads (Day/Night)
    Replies: 477
    Last Post: September 21st, 2011, 04:15 PM
  5. Night I - First Blood
    By FalseTruth in forum Forum Mafia III
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 16th, 2011, 11:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •