I'm amazed at how badly most people are misunderstanding this plan. It's not that hard.
(It's also not worth carrying out. I vote anti-hypo.)
I'm amazed at how badly most people are misunderstanding this plan. It's not that hard.
(It's also not worth carrying out. I vote anti-hypo.)
You stated it would reducing trolling....I highly doubt that, in fact....this plan is no different from normal everyday mafia games.... No one tells the truth anyway.
So whether this plan goes through or not, nothing will change
Haha. Poor Pinkie got shot down just like that.
In an effort to hide the PR's better, we could work in a buddy system where 4 or 5 people would post the same hypo.
The downside to that is PR's would need to hypo earlier to not be forced into a grouping that they don't want, mafia could influence the groups, etc.
I can't think of a way to fix the plan at this moment.
So I'm Anti-Hypo for now until it gets revised. As much as I don't want to lose a PR and not get info, I'd rather that than have them all picked off one by one. Especially considering we have like..8.
I'm in an anti-hypo time zone. I'll wait till the pro-hypos wake up.
Still don't understand how town power can be exposed.
The purpose of the hypo plan is to counter the loss of information to town due to the no last wills mechanic. There are pros and cons to this plan that people have obviously brought up, and I guess it just comes down to whether we feel like it's worth the risk of possibly revealing pr's in order to actually make sure we collect the night action results. In practice, I have originally seen it just used to reveal sheriff results, but I figured why not extend it to all PR's.
I personally am pro-plan, in it's most minimal form.
Your pharaoh has arrived, peons. Pardon your excellency while I read the 200+ replies.
Fantastic. I am back.
I am pro-plan only if the others are pro-plan as well.
Its an all or nothing deal
Better be quick... 1.2 posts appear for ever minute that passes
Yea this. But less excessively.
M.J.Frog and 2 others sheriff hypo Jack Sparrow
The next day we lynch him and he flips mafia.
The mafia can assume that 1 of you may actually be sheriff. And over time this accumulates to them finding out roles.
Especially with escort/jailor claims and even blacksmith claims.
I know it's a stretch, but I'm more worried about the escort/jailor hypos. If we take out those two then I would probably reconsider my vote.
It's funny how this whole hypo thing is bullcrap. It's just as good as a random claim like everyone always does....Just now... Your giving it a special name! Congratz! You actually a pre-existing form of scumtell/trolling attribute somemore 'fake' definition.
Sherlock is here and accustomed.
Seriously, so many posts in the first 5 hours... I barely managed to catch up.
And Jack Sparrow, for me everyone is guilty - you, those people who are voting you, and those people who don't belive people that are voting Jack Sparrow. The only person I can trust is myself.
Well I'm back
The Hypo thing only have 1 goal IMO
it is basically a more dangerous version of the last wills. Without last wills we can never know if a sheriff dies night 4 and doesn't reveal his info
Where did everybody suddenly go![]()
Meh, in my reread of the thread, I don't really find jack that scummy anymore.
-unvote
-vote Wolverine
I've just got a bit of a gut scum read on this guy after re-reading the thread. If pressed for reasons why I might be able to come up with something quantifiable.
Oh wonderful, Sherlock has arrived. I think I let him handle the reins from here.
Nawt gunna lye. I just skimmed thro the ate pages. Useless shit. Hypo plan is shit. It's like saying "Hear I'm usefool for trying. In reality thiss plan dosnt do shit"
Yes, it does. It provides a way for town to uncover "last will" type information from our town pr roles if they were to die before making their grand role claim and reveal. I would hardly say it's useless. Risky, yes. Useless no. There are pros and cons that can be debated, and I would prefer that we do some variation of this plan. However if most people would rather we don't do this, then that's fine... Just don't be sad if some PR dies without telling us any of his night action results.
Okay, time to finaly read those 375 posts
*Breaths deeply, stretches fingers*
If a sheriff dies w/o leaving a last will, we can look back on previous days and study what players he was casting suspicion on. Same goes for RB's that escorts think were significant, etc.
The point of a discussion-heavy, cit-based game of mafia is to continually reevaluate information, communication, votes, etc. in light of new things that arise later on. If a sheriff dies, we'll learn a lot just from having his role confirmed.
The risk, I think, is nowhere near worth the relatively meager potential reward. (I also think that people are underestimating just how great the risk is. Day 1, mafia can throw out all people who hypo incorrect "guilty" results and focus on the handful who have true positives. Day 2 the mafia can winnow that list down even further... Very, very quickly they'll have a tiny & accurate list of our sheriffs. Have you ever seen the "Akinator" website? It's the same principle.)
What is does is it provides a type of last will, but prevents any kind of action from taking place UNTIL the PR is dead...so basically the PR has to kill themselves just to prove a point. What good is that? It's as if your trying to reduce the PR numbers
No, a PR does not have to die to reveal themselves. They can reveal at any time. I don't see how the proposed plan precludes that at all.
Ok, I think this is a huge and legitimate concern that I hadn't considered. I don't really have a good rebuttal to this flaw in the plan.
If the general consensus seems to be that we do not care about last wills, then we should all just plan to adjust our play accordingly. Seems to me though that people here are rather lazy and would rather have solid night action claims generated by the hypo-claims to refer to upon the death of a PR than re-reading the day threads for clues. It's all just a matter of personal opinion.
Yeah, this is why you don't hypo JUST cop results. However if we're hypo'ing sheriff claims, doctor claims, and other roles without feedback then even if someone is proven to be NOT sheriff that doesn't mean they are NOT doctor. Just because someone is NOT a sheriff doesn't mean they are NOT a PR with results that they wish to convey.
How I wish there is a Coroner.
This player is guilty.
-vote FM Yosemite Sam
Hey J Frog you didn't vote scum Wolverine. You vote tag failed.
Phew, read most of the thread. However, the only posts which I was obsessing about the entire time were the 2 posts made by Robin Hood during the first 50 posts of the game.
Okay, does no one else see the total extreme scummyness in this post? He is saying that "pointing fingers" (aka: Scumhunting) is only done by scum. He is actively DISCOURAGING scumhunting. Seriously, that is around the scummyest thing I've ever read in an FM game.
Well apparently I wasn't the only person to take note of that post this day....
Early post made within the first hour of the game. Early accusation against scummyness of Hood. Nothing too hardcore. Now let's see Robin’s response...
Reactions are very important when it comes to scumhunting, and I believe as far as scummy reactions go, this is top tier. Cluseau believes that Hood’s post is scummy. He accuses Hood as scum. Hood’s response isn’t only a “You’re making me annoyed” post, but borderline threat. If my dad said “You know what? You're really getting on my nerves.” I’d interpret that as a “Shut up or things are going to get ugly”. Therefore, I would say that this is a veiled threat.
The rest of Hoods posts aren’t too interesting. However, despite posting A LOT, he has ultimately contributed next to nothing. Active lurking is when someone posts a lot, but has minimal helpful content in those posts. I would say this is definitely active lurking. Active lurking = very scummy.
I firmly believe that we are more likely to find scum by finding major scummy slip-ups instead of not approving of the overall game-tactics of a player. Hoods first posts are incredibly scummy. His posts since then have contributed little, and seem like those of one who simply wants to blend in. With D1, the amount of information is limited. However, in my opinion Hood is the most scummy player. Therefore…
-vote FM Robin Hood
No. If I've learned anything from playing FM in the past, it's that things like emotional tone/reactions are terrible indicators of alignment. "Schumhunting" based on that alone distracts the town, kills innocent players, and lets savvy scum manipulate you by playing it cool.
Inspector Cluseau was getting on my nerves early in the thread, too.
We'll learn a lot more by paying attention to things like voting patterns, tunnel vision, and the like. Not issues like getting annoyed at annoying behavior.
He had posted a few times before and yet now reveals a "gut read" on someone who has not posted yet.
And instead of saying why he instead says with conviction that someone is "guilty"
The words "guilty" after it was brought up that sheriffs can use the words guilty/innocent to reveal info is telling.
I agree with this.
Very good post.
This is partially true. If you have access to meta you can lynch scum with that. The quality of scum plays suffered greatly over the last couple of FM's. Meta dictates me that the players with a low post count are high likely to be scum. All our 1 post wonders are pretty good candidates for pressure votes.
-unvote
Jack answer me a couple of questions will you?
What are you vague reads on Frog and Wolverine.
Who would you target tonight, hypothetically.
Frog's idea is in its core not a bad idea. It's just too hard to implement it efficiently. Frog clearly invested already more time in this game than most of the other people did. This implies that he has to keep it like that for the rest of the game or people will start to call him out as scum.
I have a strong town read on him. The plan has flaws but in the end he lead to a more cultivated form of dialogue on this Day 1 which is a good thing.
All i remember about Wolverine is his avatar. I have no reads on him. Which doesn't imply anything.
The better question is. Where are those roleblocks?
You didn't answer my second question last night.