I don't like Winston, but I've not seen enough from him for a strong judgment. However, I do agree with a point made against Hanzo. Hanzo seems to rely on insinuations to make his points, not clearly spelling out motivations.
Something like this:
I agree with the logical deduction that Pharah made originally on the point, and it wasn't really a hard one to make or understand. Scum had a pregame chat that. Yet Hanzo tries to cast shade on it with this statement; but doesn't press the point. It's the subtle things that are easy to backtrack on, but which can help begin to set the seeds of doubt about another slot's credibility. Also, it generates useless content that I think can often be indicative of scum, arguing about logical points instead of focusing on slot-specific analysis and game narrative, yet still makes the player appear active and 'useful'.
Another quote and the closest thing we got to a read attempt; said jack shit and took no positions on any of these 4 players.
General impression I get from quick skim of posts is, trying to seem useful without being so. Needling other players but not following through with the thrust, instead just letting it hang there.
-vote M-FM Hanzo