yeah whatever
this is some bullshit theatre
vote cape and we are goodie
Praise the Lord!
a post being crafted or not is very NAI lmao
we all have our intentions and purposes in pursuit of our wincons, so looking at whether something is crafted is very nuance-less and unreliable for reading whether that purpose is for good or bad
an example of that could be seeing whether someone's reasoning and progression is favorable or unfavorable to the point of pursuing a specific conclusion, which would suggest a specific agenda
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
I think I may have figured out what I want to look for whenever I meta-dive later. Because I'll want to do that for Mizery, either to see if I'm scumreading a part of them that's actually just normal or if its actually problematic.
This post was intentionally left vague.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Looked at the 20 or so past posts of Oli's for re-evaluation and I think he's just town.
Something about his energy that feels invested and engaged with the game while not really agenda'ed -- I associate that more closely with classic town oli.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Why are you talking like you're teaching me how to play mafia
Non hostile mode activated
because it doesn't seem like you've taken solving me seriously in most of your posts
I've not seen a decent argument come out of you and yet you keep vaguely/implicitly suggesting I'm mafia or one of the people pushing you is, and that those who know you should somehow know you're town
Kinda surprised that people aren't townreading me who are familiar with meyou don't need to understand my methods of making reads, I'm used to people thinking my methods are pretty stupid and fake.Everyone blindly agreeing with dms read on me looks just so bad for being completely opportunisticAll of those quotes opportunistically taken from one post or another that you've made this day phase, but otherwise not chronologically ordered.Not a single post martin made today has been good
Really the only time I've seen something serious and maybe some cogs working in your heads is when you were engaging with me for a short time:
tell me what other assumptions you'd like to work from?
Do you think Oli is a wolf? Do you think huo huo is a wolf?
Oli's most recent post is more wolfy than not, but do you have a big issue with my PoE at SoD?
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
I gotta say that having super crafted post may be alignment indicative imo.
Some are so much crafted that they are just created in a way to not slip any emotion, info, overreaction.
Guess which alignments must hide their true self.
I'm not saying that lacking of them makes you scum, but it could give an image of a stoic emotionless guy who may be trying to hide something.
Overall I believe it's all about having a great balance between "crafted" and on-the-fly posts.
Like, sorry for being condescending if you're town here.
If you're town then we just don't have the same mindset at all and its kinda wrong of me to be judgemental over that.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
I agree, but I've not seen anything substantiating my posts to be super crafted lol.
Like honestly, for me, this is the sort of post I would want to see in response to what I said. One that identifies the nuances and how they may be used, and if you are using those nuances, how they relate to me. You know what, I'm going to toss a town-point to you just because I feel like it.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
This is a nit-picky callout over my own wording, but regardless of my own wording the over-arching idea was still communicated I think
The over-arching idea being: You said that my posts were super crafted or whatever
but you didn't back that up with anything
no nuance on the crafted-ness, which suggests you're arguing that any craftedness is a measure of suspiciousness (its not any level -- there is nuance to it as Auwt as has shown beyond whether something is or isn't crafted)
no evidence or pointing out what specifically is wrong with my craftedness or whatever
just nothing
the whole "martin has crafted posts" is a nothingburger without all of that and yet is still an attempt to say something on me, and you're still trying to do that by implying as if I'm somehow self-contradictory here when I'm not
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
You know what, I'm on repeat. I'm done dedicating time to this.
If you want to interact with me or whatever
please give some sort of substance
not whatever it is that you're doing
because frankly I don't get it
if you're mafia + cape is mafia then you're for some reason hanging around despite a bleak situation for the mafia (Helz has protection, cape has been caught, you're seen as a plausible partner in general, there are only 3 mafia, its only day 2, ect.)
if you're mafia + cape is neutral then you're for some reason concerned about the pressure (re: your vauge suspicions on people supposedly opportunistically sussing you) about you that won't foment into full force because you know cape is not mafia
and if you're town or neutral (in which case it doesn't matter what Cape is) it doesn't seem like you're inclined at all for others to discover that you're town, and only throw out vague posts and implicit accusations with nothing else and rarely any follow-up on some other stuff that would (at least from a non-mizery pov) constitute solving. Even in your most recent post your fullest effort in that regard is to just nit-pick me.
As far as how I personally play mafia, I wouldn't be doing whatever it is that you're doing. Not as any alignment. Maybe that's rude of me to say, but there's no use in hiding my frank opinions. Maybe I'm wrong and just don't know it.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Just because you don't play like me doesn't mean either of us are wrong
There's no objectively correct way to play that fits each person
Some people will say there are but they're just like wrong so they don't matter
Pop-in / pop-out backreading mode activated; slightly busy and have lots of catching up to do
Very fair and very clear reasoning. That said, I'd argue that's just DM. As much as I don't trust Mizery, this post you later quoted:
is literally my mind
It's not TMI certainty, since he changes his mind all the time and has a visible, if not utterly convincing, progression. It's just... omg I just made myself laugh here lol, it's just DBZA Vegeta, literally
no i havent watched the real thing so i dont know how annoying the actual vegeta is but that parody renders it very well
He could be neutral, I guess, but I think he's most likely just an annoying, poorly playing townie (because yes, DM, spamming the thread and acting like God hath revealed everything to you is not optimal team play lol).
So I don't think he's scum. I do really like your analysis, though, Auwt.
for what its worth, and regardless of anyone's alignment, you seem to have misinterpreted a lot of stuff Martin has been saying, thinking he's "pissed" or being super condescending when I don't think that was his intent at all lol, he's been pretty cool for the entire game, so don't be too harsh on him XD
Technically the game ended in a draw, I didn’t win nor lose, but my end game solve was correct.
However the solve was based if there is a neutral or not which I didn’t know because the solve changes for scenario.
I said a player was wolf only if there is no neutral or else the team is actually these 2.
The only thing I was wrong on that game was the king being good, they were actually evil.
Which is surprising because they voted off wolves, made very pro town plays in thread and even was willing to be killed because it is “mechanically fine as people might be sus thinking they are evil king” and for context I was a role that could kill the king and I am a player that is likely to kill something I suspect and I was quite hesitant and I was definitely thinking about it but the king did a good job playing with me there.
Like the dude even said I should be king because I am mech clear town.
1) Interactions or even more broadly addressing the slot, even in the third person instead of the second. Like, not only did you not talk to Baker, you also did not talk about him. I guess I stretched the meaning of the word "interaction" lol, but the idea remains the same - and tbh, considering you should know you haven't justified your vote in any way since it was a purely naked vote, you should understand what I'm saying instead of trying to find "legal" reasons by playing on words imo.
2) Maybe (I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt when it comes to this because lying about out of game activity reasons is dirty). That said, the vote was nonetheless conveniently placed there without any reason (no interaction, no reasoning, NOTHING), and O surprise, it happened to be where others went as well... I will concede that it could explain things partially, though.
w-what
what did I just read xD
I mean, it's "convenient" because it follows the natural progression of the thread. Scumbot was like "oooo you've seen the light ooooooooo" while I didn't even know he had made a case against Huo XD. Reading Huo's ISO + Scumbot's case was the obvious way to go there (especially since Scumbot was the only one saying interesting stuff at that specific moment iirc), and the ISO spoke for itself from there.
On D1, that's the definition of a nullread, basically. They hadn't pretended to be useful, they had just UwU'd endlessly lol, so their behavior was pretty much NAI. It obviously wouldn't have been the same if it had been on later days, since I'd have expected them to have done more, but shitposty D1's are pretty common, even though I dislike them in theory, and voting people based on them has served me poorly in the past.
(Also, considering it's very unlikely their claim is fake, I was very probably right to keep that healthy distance lol. So yes, that absolutely was my EoD1 reasoning, and I stand by it.)
@bwcPorscha pinging you since it might interest you. Also please do read about Huo's gravedigger -> teacher claim lol, it's kinda important
@MM
Yeah so I was sus on Porscha when I read that as well but when they caught up I could generally see their reads change and they were sorting everything out to gather their new thoughts.
DM, I'm just going to ignore your post streaks if you basically waste thread space and post nothing of value for the game in them lol.
Also, why are you calling Auwt mafia basically for attacking what you're saying? What is this OMGUS lol, you're not a noob, so there's something I don't get here. (Or perhaps you're just too biased with your "high accuracy" and think anyone going against you must 100 % have bad intent)
What if Mizery is evil vengeful?
Damn it’s like if they are and I somehow figured it out (which would probably be never but.) I would change the way I approach Day 3.
Ah but maybe I should do it anyway, it would be funny to see Mizery cry after getting executed as Evil Vengeful.
Yeah so 2 things.
1)I do tend to speak my mind allot which does end up meaning I post a little too much all at once.
2)Remember I am still technically searching for the last mafia and the only reason I suspect Auwt is because I think him thinking I would Omega buss here is just lol and can be desperate mafia play.
Literally so tilted by dm I shouldn't even be responding to him and yet
My apologies if I tilted you.
Tell you what, if you come back as the same alignment as me I’ll compliment you for the rest of the game.
I think your cherry picking your reads. If you make many claims in a game one has to be a solve.
Spoiler : Not game related ramblings :
People are having an issue with both the lack of content in your FOS as well as your tone as you present it. When I feel I have identified a scum player I go out of my way to outline exactly why I feel that player may be scum so others can understand my reasoning and maybe adopt my point of view. I find that to be much more effective than just pushing "Im a good player so listen to me" or hinting at having every variety of PR powers to justify the stance.
I will also say your posting style makes it rather difficult to follow your reasoning or reads. You regularly throw down 10 posts in a row with blips of thoughts on many subjects. I think people could follow your reasoning better if you consolidated your thoughts on one subject clearly in one post.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
lol you don't imagine how much I am happy to bring it back as well XD
I swear, RNGsus hated me recently, even in the game that lasted like 36 hours lol
Also, as stupid as it may seem, I townread (or at least non-scumread, could be neutral being solvy) this post from Varcron, simply because someone who knows me is likely to think that XD. Don't think it's TMI either, it's too natural for that
(obviously I may not be ENTIRELY OBJECTIVE, but shhh)
Honestly, I don't get the post you quoted, and don't get your reply either. I'm confused. Maybe I'm just being dumb, but can you explain, please?
I like this. I doubt scum!Varcron wants to put himself under the spotlight that way; it's purely done for the sake of better read accuracy and questioning DM's tunnel/overconfidence, which is clearly town-motivated (not even neutral-motivated imo).
Also, speaking of inactives: WHERE IS LILYPETAL, AND WHY IS NOBODY QUESTIONING HER, EVER? I literally had to go see her ISO to make sure she wasn't blackmailed or something, and then realized I had read her D2 posts, but they were so empty and unnoticeable I had forgotten them.
Considering the amount of towny people + the amount of scum/neutrals, she gains significant scum equity by simply not being towny. She would be a good candidate for bounty hunter imo.
Explainations on your Martin scumread would be welcome. I agree with Auwt and Oliverz probably being non-scum, but I'm not sure I see Martin, even though there's something in the back of my mind telling me to be careful about him (even though I find him to be logically towny; see my colorful readslist, he's on top of it).
Emphasis on "for free": I found him more likely non-town than town simply due to lack of being towny (as opposed to many others), so by elimination, I kinda suspected him. Honestly, I'm not sure what to do with his slot, his ISO... exists, idk.
Outdated read, I hadn't read her in ISO format and ISO format makes her look pretty bad tbh. My read was based on tone, and it's not like you can change that by saying "I shouldn't have read her for that", it's my read in my own brain xD
Since I've seen a lot of posts implying a misunderstanding of the game's lynch system: this is PLURALITY ONLY (no majority, since no hammer, so day cannot end early), and no-voters count as skip-the-day voters.
(Game theory wise though, Helz is right, days shouldn't ever be ended early unless it's strictly necessary tbh; time plays in town's favor)
not cool to call someone a fool or an idiot, just saying
though fool is a softer term ig
but point is if you're going to attack someone you should leave it to their gameplay and not their individual person
(and no, I'm not trying to moderate or whatever here, I'm just expressing my personal opinion on this irrespective of the rules)
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
https://media3.giphy.com/media/jtlvN...iphy.webp&ct=g
yeah ty Helz, our confimed mafia president town king hall leader
Praise the Lord!
is there a way to embed gifs?
Praise the Lord!