If you suspect Fury why isn't your suspicion piqued by the fact he just canceled his vote on ccantman? Does that not suggest collusion to you? I'm just bringing it up because it is making me second guess my hard stance against you. Perhaps it is ccantman/Fury that are the scum and not you two.
Seriously less than 3 hours left and you derail the vote??? Who is your primary suspect now, because you don't just get to derail this without a viable theory. You concede that your earlier vote on srceenplay was poorly reasoned AND it makes it look like there is collusion between you two. Then you appeal to the authority of the "most experienced player" when Gyrlander himself is an unknown entity who replaced an AFK. You're really fishy RN.
Based on SP's reluctance to look at my logic, I want to lynch him. If you've played with me in the mod, the thing I hate the most when I'm town are irrational players. It means if we fuck up, then irrational players will easily be persuaded by evils. Town members are good, and reason should eventually lead to that being discovered.
1 I was giving my read.
2 I said I want to lynch Fury "instead of were others were looking" cantman
3
4
5 talking about setup and analyzing is something they have done all day. It's consistent and something I would call playstyle.
6 I think we can all agree if Rachyl didn't claim doctor we all would of lynched her. Not really derailed anything.
I didn't derail the vote with less than 3 hours left. The vote an hour ago was against you and I voiced my opinion on why I didn't think it was you. Why didn't you complain that time when I "derailed the vote?" If you've been reading my posts and paying attention, you'll know I've been begging SP to read my posts and respond. Check my post history. I will wait.
The prime suspects are Fury, Ccantman, and Screenplay. with a huge emphasis on Ccantman.
This is based on the assumption that screenplay and I are mafia buddies then? and If screenplay is mafia, then defending me makes me mafia?
I assume this is the same as above?
SP wanted 1 of 3 people. Fury was on my mind since Day 1 ended. His pick of 3 was irrelavant to my choice.
I didn't buddy you. It was after we started posting those game thoughs. I switch from Fury to SP as Fury was no longer under my suspicion, and SP's responses that nitpicked against you became things that didn't seem right.
My vote was on fury that whole time. I gave my point of view with that. No one else had votes that time. And for about 24 hours, no one said anything waiting for the replacement. I had my view point. everyone else had there. there was no conving anyone at that point. But look now, we hav
My point was to actually avoid the random lynch as it was low shot of working. But pointing out that if we didn't lynch, we are still in a poor position.
There was discussion about lynching the afk and lurkers. we know our numbers. it was best to get the active mafia over the afk mafia that may not even exist. We know one of the actives was mafia based on numbers. this post was showing those numbers
Yes in retrospec not the best use of time, it was just eating at me
@srceenplay , https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showth...ginning/page14
Read those posts. If you can't be bothered to read all of them, then read the last one.
Both of you idiots accused me of being mafia based on faulty logic. I only haven't lynched ccantman because he realized that. You, have not.
And yes, you both are idiots.
I am Fury-ous.
Lastly, if Alijach doesn't start talking, I'm voting him from the first second on day 3.
Scum playstyle maybe, but tends to smother actual discussion, especially when it happens into d2 and beyond.
I think casting doubt on Rachyl as late into d2 as ccantman did is counterproductive. And maybe you would have lynched her if you hadn't forced her to claim doc, but you can't speak for the rest of us
The fact you feel the need to respond to post that condemns ccantman in the first place speaks volumes. Peas in a pod, you two.
I only see one question their from you Fury.
I did answer it. I said when I get home I will.
About another 30 min until home.
First I'm scum for hammering too soon and now I'm scum for fearing a swift hammer?
Someone who has this as their first game is still trying to figure out optimal play style.
So I don't read it as scumy.
I gotta drive.
BBL
Are my posts saying why I think SP is scum not actually coming across me saying my ideas properly??
What I'm more blown away by is the fact that he has been targeting you for the last 48 hours, yet you've said nothing in response. It almost makes me feel like he's going hard against you so that if he flips scum, then no one would check you. I read you as town, but frankly you're completely ignoring SP going against you.
hay Dougler, did you cast a vote yet?
@thedougler , I just find it questionable that you have dropped your case against him so quickly.
I'm not asking you to cancel your vote. I frankly view ccantman as scum and intend to hammer him, but SP has just concerned me more. No one has addressed that he finds both of us as the only evils, despite no evidence supporting that. I have asked him to explain his logic and he hasn't
Where ccantman won't make a hard claim, SP has made 2 hard claims - both without evidence.
If you find posts of yours where you claimed SP before all of this started, then I'll give you credit.
-vote srcreenplay
I'm at home.
Eating dinner.
How much more time is left.
I see they are still throwing shade at one another.
Ok, I did find you take a hard stance against SP, so I take back what I said. Still, you took so long to actually come to a hard stance. I still think you're scum for that reason, to be frank. You wasted a lot of time, and honestly you seem like exactly the type of player who needs a mentor. Why didn't you ask for one? Like I have been saying, the only reason why I haven't voted you already is because I think SP is more scum.