Excuse the typo
Excuse the typo
Yeah I think I got it mixed. I re-check and It was mesk, not death.
The context is still obvious though. Only mesk voted MM on his first post
Why are you constructing it from a third-person point of view whilst it is very obvious those remarks are targeted to me. Scum painting me by saying that I'm "uncharacteristically smart" isn't really that good -1
NGL but I like to add some fluffs on this site. On the other sites, I don't but let's not talk about outside games.
Mmm. Making a read list is a red flag? I understand where deathworld is coming from. But your remarks on the read list being a red flag? I already explained it. It's not a read list, it's a list pointed out to every player to start a discussion. But it seems you view those kind of things as a "red flag" how is that?
In bastard setups scum benefit from information not being discussed, granted the only bastard part of this setup is cognizant on the player's choice of cards, and the ITA mechanic.
For now I would be content to say scum consists of lurkers, but that's a weak first-half-of-day-one set of reads. I'll fully develop my reads by the 2nd half of d1. By the time everyone checks in we can start analyzing how people interact with each other to try and see any amount of buddying or if people are avoiding talking to a specific player because they have already said all they need to to said player in a scum day chat perhaps.
I am probably reaching too much into this, but why would your choice of words be "I think" at a point when you should "know"?
It is uncharacteristic of your prior games, explain why this game is different. That is all. No harm, no foul. If you are town, I do not want to mis-lynch or mis-shoot you, my fellow fruit
You could ask me the same question, you know. What I just posted is also uncharacteristic of my D1s.
Going back to your earlier post, can you tell me what you meant about discuss vs not discuss (function of bastard setup or not). I am town. What do we benefit from? And if your answer benefits the scum then dont answer and move on. I did not understand what you were trying to say there.
OK let me ask this question: assuming that you are town, what are you doing as a good town member to improve our odds of winning this game compared to your earlier town games?
I think this is my game 15 or so. You and I are not too far off that's why we always get voted up D1 lol.
You could ask me the same question, you know. What I just posted is also uncharacteristic of my D1s.PQRnHack
I am probably reaching too much into this, but why would your choice of words be "I think" at a point when you should "know"?
Does it really matter? The context is there
It is uncharacteristic of your prior games, explain why this game is different. That is all. No harm, no foul. If you are town, I do not want to mis-lynch or mis-shoot you, my fellow fruit
Not really. But I'm a new player with less than 10 games. I guess that counts as evolving or whatever you call it.
*fixed
Any amount of information that is given or discussed publicly can be utilized and analyzed by every single player that bothers to read it, by default there are more town than there are scum. Usually this is a net positive for town in terms of information processed, town has more brains and more perspectives to PoE from than scum has brains to twist said information or use it for their own gain.
That does not answer my question. If you are town, I do not want to mis-eliminate you. So please take like 30 mins before your next reply.
And i'm gonna have to check if you have truly been town only once, that doesn't align with me. Oh, I guess you are excluding the games where you were present for a few hours and got replaced. Got it!
Hey! join us?
-vote BradLand
a) the time is not appropriate as discussed in our strategy, so you may have missed that
b) read my longer post. it is a spectrum and obviously a range of probabilities.
c) more time needed to figure out how we can most optimally execute our strategy. so i am frankly not prepared. home work is required.
Can I be the first person to test the ITA?
Thanks
yes. it's hard for scum to propose a plan that could actively backfire in their faces with very little room for error or recovery. Basically wolf?Seanzie doing this either needs to have a rock solid team behind him and an exit strategy should it blow up OR he's planning on just loosing a hail of shots and then getting shot/chopped, and that doesn't seem very wolf?Seanzie to me
PQR reminds me a lot of Ace Marvel when Ace decides to just be Ace.
I will not be shooting Sean or Hollowkat or Deathworlds unless enforced to do so by the power of our collective. I also make the motion that votes by those 4 people (myself included) carry a higher vote power than the rest. I apologize if you are not being a lock-town, but we are here to win this together, so please allow me to lead. But I am also willing delegate my lead to either Sean or Hollow.
State your desired leader and we roll with it. And yeah, we about to kill 2-3! Let's go.
Okay, at this point, I am going to go to bed soon, but haven't heard any strong objections or requests for changes to the plan I proposed. In order to give people time to confirm they understand the plan, I'm going to lay it out now.
Since I did not hear any objections, I'm going to insist we go with the following ITA plan:
We will likely have enough ITAs to kill two extra people today. Here is how I propose we do it. Note that one facet of this plan is that while I will play some part in facilitating the plan, the plan is specifically designed to not have me have any extra power, so even if you don't townread me, you can trust the plan.
There will be two "artificial deadlines" added in addition to the EoD deadline. One will be at 11 pm EST on 1/24 (when ITAs become available), and one will be at 7am EST on 1/24 (4 hours before EoD). Whomever is the top wagon at these artificial EoDs will very likely be killed, so please take this seriously!!
At the first EoD, I will screenshot and post the current VC. If there is a tie, I will figure out who reached the "winning" number of votes first, so there is a unique person targeted. At that point I will ask people in the thread to ITA that person until they die. Hopefully they will die quickly so we can see their flip and re-evaluate before the second artificial EoD. The second artificial EoD will happen in the same way.
Any ITAs that do NOT respect the votecount of the first or second artificial deadline will be considered a scum claim. Do NOT shoot outside the two names we agree on as a group.
If you have read this plan and agree, please respond to this saying you agree. If you have questions, please ask well before the first artificial deadline.
If anyone knows they'll be available at 7am EST on 11/24 can you volunteer to facilitate the second artificial deadline (figure out who is the vote, and get anyone who hasn't used their ITA yet to shoot that person)? I can try to be up then, but that is very early for me, so if someone else can agree to do it, that would be much better for me.
Everyone else, please respond to this to agree to the plan.
Spoiler : tags :
This is great Sean, the scum are probably trembling in a corner right now LETS GO TEAM!!!!
I agree but maybe my msg didnt go thru. I AM TOTALLY DOWN!