Quote Originally Posted by oops_ur_dead View Post
Oh man, that one's going in the hall of fame.

"shit beasts are so dangerous and unpredictably aggressive that normal, sane people are rightfully afraid of them, which makes them a fantastic companion to defend your family and home with"
Its sad that we live in a world where fear and force are things that exist. Its sometimes hard for those who do not fear for their safety and feel the need to have force to protect themselves to understand the reasoning of people who do. But it does not make those people irrational or stupid and if you can not see their perspective you may want to take a moment to understand the limitations of your view.

Again though, if we ignore the arguments and conclusions and cut to the solution how can it be implemented? Are we going to cut to dog breed genocide? Are we only going for pure breeds? Any amount of Pitt DNA at all? If not how much of a mix and how would you test them? How would you enforce any of it and are you ok with showing up to peoples homes and taking dogs from their family's? Is it going to cause more harm to the minds of children for them to have their pets taken from them and murdered? Do we go after the next aggressive breed next if we did remove pits and how many breeds until we stop?

None of that looks workable to me in any way and even taking a stance on where to draw the line is pretty rough.