S-FM 353: Death Nominations

[scumbot5679]

That's good to know. Something something alt account shouldn't be allowed, because they're scummy by tone. That's from someone I've played with.

@scumbot5679 now that mm flipped town, where do u go next? Do u have a potential wolfteam of 3?

I think Vittae is scum b/c dude was badgering me on PAGE 2 about reads. That's like classic scum.

I'm pretty wary of Martin b/c his "reasons" to scum read me were trash. I do like that he kinda backed off at me toward EOD and I think you could really look at that as town that's just reevaluating but on the other side of the coin, he's scum that is trying to deescalate the situation and all my flip does is put him in the nomination bracket and shines a spotlight on him. Would he really be willing to flip me at the expense of being on the chopping block d2 when he could have just let me tunnel MM and avoid responsibility?

but those were the 2 off the top of my head as varcon/lol/whoever else is just a blur so im going to iso them and get back to you.

[Wiml]

I think Vittae is scum b/c dude was badgering me on PAGE 2 about reads. That's like classic scum.

This is... blatantly false and seems like an extremely disingenuous approach towards me.

I was asking questions related to your reads three pages into the game (not two, I checked) but more importantly by the time the game was onto page three am I was asking these questions it was almost half way into the day phase and at a point where several players had posted more than enough for you to at least have made a stance on. It's difficult to excuse not having readable content by that point in the game and when I questioned you on it, you fully ignored me.

But let's assume that you were right for a second: can you talk me through why me asking you for reads prematurely would be "classic scum" to begin with in your eyes? I fail to see what you're arguing would be wolf indicative here even if the rest of you were saying was factual.

[Wiml]

And that's with giving you the benefit of the doubt over saying the wrong page number to begin with.

[Wiml]

This is... blatantly false and seems like an extremely disingenuous approach towards me.

I was asking questions related to your reads three pages into the game (not two, I checked) but more importantly by the time the game was onto page three am I was asking these questions it was almost half way into the day phase and at a point where several players had posted more than enough for you to at least have made a stance on. It's difficult to excuse not having readable content by that point in the game and when I questioned you on it, you fully ignored me.

But let's assume that you were right for a second: can you talk me through why me asking you for reads prematurely would be "classic scum" to begin with in your eyes? I fail to see what you're arguing would be wolf indicative here even if the rest of you were saying was factual.

@scumbot5679 please respond to this.