The "decision" as you call is not based on what Kildja wrote, but based on what the staff have found in the game.
When you try to appeal, you don't have to prove how or why or what the original poster did wrong, you have to prove either your good faith, or how the one who processed the report forgot something important that could potentially change the outcome of your punishment.
Whether you find Kildja's post frivolous, that is one thing, but what happens in the report is another.
And as stated previously, I don't see any good faith in your deflective/R* apologist post nor any missing point that Arrow did not catch that would play in your favor.
Whether I take or not the recent report as an evidence is only to assess even more your good faith in this case.
The two of them are alike, and supprisingly match together very well, you.
Excuse me but I just find it funny that you call out for "THEME IS SUPER OFFENSIVE RACISM" in the newest report, while reading in this report that you do not intend to be offensive with the """"""different"""""" name you chose in this game. You won't pay everyones head, be assured.
What the appeal process is here for, is to prove your behaviour has changed (in a good way, obviously) since then, to find any mistake/missing worth-noting points, and how you are acting now.
Behaviour got changed ? No, recent report tells otherwhise. (you should know why)
Mistake/Missing points ? No, nothing worth. (deflection, mainly)
Current behaviour ? No, R* apologist thread, find it funny.
You got a triple here.
Feel free to blame the state of the game, this is usually the moment when there is not much to add.