S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0
Register

User Tag List

Results 1 to 50 of 1769

Hybrid View

  1. ISO #1

  2. ISO #2

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Lag you're the best at analyzing setups. If you really don't know what to do, that's okay. However, if you don't provide a suggestion, I think town's only strategy will be to follow what PQ said--which I don't really agree with--or just lynch scum.

    -vote WrathCyber
    Yo, you are not going to be skating by in my town. Tell me what you don't agree with in my strategy and do so in the next 5 minutes. You are being lazier than Wrath and that is punishable.

    Spoiler : tell me :

  3. ISO #3

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Yo, you are not going to be skating by in my town. Tell me what you don't agree with in my strategy and do so in the next 5 minutes. You are being lazier than Wrath and that is punishable.

    Spoiler : tell me :
    This makes zero freaking sense.

  4. ISO #4

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    This makes zero freaking sense.
    Tick tok, you are out of time. You are offering an empty response when I ask you to explain why you do not agree with my strategy. Are you buying time to come up with some lame excuse? I thought about it, I know some potential flaws. Do you? Let's hear it! You are past the deadline, start playing the game or get lynched scumbag!

  5. ISO #5

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Yo, you are not going to be skating by in my town. Tell me what you don't agree with in my strategy and do so in the next 5 minutes. You are being lazier than Wrath and that is punishable.

    Spoiler : tell me :
    lol have you played with treecko before? There's only one way this ends
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho

  6. ISO #6

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Lag you're the best at analyzing setups. If you really don't know what to do, that's okay. However, if you don't provide a suggestion, I think town's only strategy will be to follow what PQ said--which I don't really agree with--or just lynch scum.

    -vote WrathCyber
    This is a complete load of fecal matter. Lag does not get a pass for not knowing what to do. It cannot be real, I think Lag and I both know her intentions behind the posts as also suggested by her herself when stated we should be scumreading her for those posts. It is NOT "okay" and your stating that it is is unacceptable.

    -vote theoneceko

  7. ISO #7

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Lag you're the best at analyzing setups. If you really don't know what to do, that's okay. However, if you don't provide a suggestion, I think town's only strategy will be to follow what PQ said--which I don't really agree with--or just lynch scum.

    -vote WrathCyber
    Picking a random choice between rep, dem, 3rd party, and no one (25% chance for each, maybe even 30% for no one/3rd party and 20% for the two main parties) are the best options

    it minimizes your vulnerability to the night kill while also minimizing the risk of town getting snowed by a night 1 ballot box steal.

    The big problem with town all voting for only the main two candidates is that if half the town votes for each party, then you have 4 votes on each of the main two parties (counting conspiracy theorist as town here since they're basically town)

    Which when combined with a night 1 ballot box steal + 3 illuminati votes for the bad guy, you'll go into day 2 with a 7 to 0 vote lead on the bad guy. That's very bad, almost insurmountably bad.

    By spreading town votes out among four choices rather than two, it greatly minimizes the risk of a scenario like that while also minimizing vulnerability to the factional kill.

    Beyond that, we'll have to rely on power roles to find out who the scum want to elect + wolf hunt, and then go from there and hope we're not so far behind that it's too late

  8. ISO #8

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Lag View Post
    Picking a random choice between rep, dem, 3rd party, and no one (25% chance for each, maybe even 30% for no one/3rd party and 20% for the two main parties) are the best options

    it minimizes your vulnerability to the night kill while also minimizing the risk of town getting snowed by a night 1 ballot box steal.

    The big problem with town all voting for only the main two candidates is that if half the town votes for each party, then you have 4 votes on each of the main two parties (counting conspiracy theorist as town here since they're basically town)

    Which when combined with a night 1 ballot box steal + 3 illuminati votes for the bad guy, you'll go into day 2 with a 7 to 0 vote lead on the bad guy. That's very bad, almost insurmountably bad.

    By spreading town votes out among four choices rather than two, it greatly minimizes the risk of a scenario like that while also minimizing vulnerability to the factional kill.

    Beyond that, we'll have to rely on power roles to find out who the scum want to elect + wolf hunt, and then go from there and hope we're not so far behind that it's too late
    DOn't flipping give it away. He needs to come up with that himself.

  9. ISO #9

  10. ISO #10

  11. ISO #11

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Lag View Post
    Picking a random choice between rep, dem, 3rd party, and no one (25% chance for each, maybe even 30% for no one/3rd party and 20% for the two main parties) are the best options

    it minimizes your vulnerability to the night kill while also minimizing the risk of town getting snowed by a night 1 ballot box steal.

    The big problem with town all voting for only the main two candidates is that if half the town votes for each party, then you have 4 votes on each of the main two parties (counting conspiracy theorist as town here since they're basically town)

    Which when combined with a night 1 ballot box steal + 3 illuminati votes for the bad guy, you'll go into day 2 with a 7 to 0 vote lead on the bad guy. That's very bad, almost insurmountably bad.

    By spreading town votes out among four choices rather than two, it greatly minimizes the risk of a scenario like that while also minimizing vulnerability to the factional kill.

    Beyond that, we'll have to rely on power roles to find out who the scum want to elect + wolf hunt, and then go from there and hope we're not so far behind that it's too late
    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    I think it's a 1/6 chance because a player can vote for Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Gus Hall, John B. Anderson, God, or no one.

    :^)
    Maths are against the town.
    That's what I've learned from my past games.
    Quote Originally Posted by Efekannn02 View Post
    MM Magoroth and Distorted are the 3 baddies
    just like Agrael Acriel and Auwt being the original 3 baddies
    Quote Originally Posted by Efekannn02 View Post
    MafiaZ and Skwirl its all a repeat of history
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkRevenant View Post
    But Potoss has Pobes, Zeelot, and Acrons!
    Quote Originally Posted by Efekannn02 View Post
    Screw you I actually have more grudges towards the people who have their names start with A

  12. ISO #12

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Lag View Post
    Picking a random choice between rep, dem, 3rd party, and no one (25% chance for each, maybe even 30% for no one/3rd party and 20% for the two main parties) are the best options

    it minimizes your vulnerability to the night kill while also minimizing the risk of town getting snowed by a night 1 ballot box steal.

    The big problem with town all voting for only the main two candidates is that if half the town votes for each party, then you have 4 votes on each of the main two parties (counting conspiracy theorist as town here since they're basically town)

    Which when combined with a night 1 ballot box steal + 3 illuminati votes for the bad guy, you'll go into day 2 with a 7 to 0 vote lead on the bad guy. That's very bad, almost insurmountably bad.

    By spreading town votes out among four choices rather than two, it greatly minimizes the risk of a scenario like that while also minimizing vulnerability to the factional kill.

    Beyond that, we'll have to rely on power roles to find out who the scum want to elect + wolf hunt, and then go from there and hope we're not so far behind that it's too late
    I think it's a 1/6 chance because a player can vote for Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Gus Hall, John B. Anderson, God, or no one.

    :^)

  13. ISO #13

  14. ISO #14

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    I think it's a 1/6 chance because a player can vote for Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Gus Hall, John B. Anderson, God, or no one.

    :^)
    I asked exactly that before the game, you can't vote for 3rd party candidates that are not in the game, you can only vote for "third party"

  15. ISO #15

  16. ISO #16

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Damn straight, that is why I knew it was factually incorrect! So is this a town-slip or nah?
    This is a partial town-tell for me. As town I think of that strategy more often than I think of it as wolf, so it's definitely town indicative, but I can definitely come up with that idea as wolf too

  17. ISO #17

  18. ISO #18

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Lag View Post
    Picking a random choice between rep, dem, 3rd party, and no one (25% chance for each, maybe even 30% for no one/3rd party and 20% for the two main parties) are the best options

    it minimizes your vulnerability to the night kill while also minimizing the risk of town getting snowed by a night 1 ballot box steal.

    The big problem with town all voting for only the main two candidates is that if half the town votes for each party, then you have 4 votes on each of the main two parties (counting conspiracy theorist as town here since they're basically town)

    Which when combined with a night 1 ballot box steal + 3 illuminati votes for the bad guy, you'll go into day 2 with a 7 to 0 vote lead on the bad guy. That's very bad, almost insurmountably bad.

    By spreading town votes out among four choices rather than two, it greatly minimizes the risk of a scenario like that while also minimizing vulnerability to the factional kill.

    Beyond that, we'll have to rely on power roles to find out who the scum want to elect + wolf hunt, and then go from there and hope we're not so far behind that it's too late
    This relies entirely on power roles to give us information. Eeeeehhh. Do we have a choice, though? Probably not. So what do we do, use www.random.org and vote (or abstain) like this, as every good citizen would?
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  19. ISO #19

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    This relies entirely on power roles to give us information. Eeeeehhh. Do we have a choice, though? Probably not. So what do we do, use www.random.org and vote (or abstain) like this, as every good citizen would?
    thoughts on oliver? thoughts on sb16? Have you read my posts?

  20. ISO #20

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by WrathCyber View Post
    thoughts on oliver? thoughts on sb16? Have you read my posts?
    No, no, and not really, apart from "YAY A VOTER" when PQ random-voted you, which I liked tone-wise (and that's not exactly a strong read lol).
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  21. ISO #21

    Re: S-FM 340: Election Day 2.0

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    I am usually tilted when I play FM. I start shaking whenever I play because I'm so stressed, but no one should let that prevent them from scumreading me.
    Okay, I can believe that, and that is NAI. And a little sad: we're just having fun don't stress over it!
    Quote Originally Posted by Lag View Post
    My experience with you as town is you're much more manic, right now you sound very measured.
    Eh, "very measured" may be an exaggeration, but I see where you're going with this
    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    Yes, I know exactly what's going on in this game.
    And this. THIS. ??????????? this post is TERRIBLY wrong lol. @theoneceko O Supreme Enlightened, O Great Illuminati, pray tell us who the wrong candidate is in this case? If that is not what you meant, I would like details :P. Looking at the rest of your posts, such as "PQ is the only one helping town right now", it feels like you're pointing at things saying "This is red. This is blue. This is good. This isn't. I know this.", and that is S U S P I C I O U S.

    Also, let the record show PQ and Ceko are not scummates.
    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Lag you're the best at analyzing setups. If you really don't know what to do, that's okay. However, if you don't provide a suggestion, I think town's only strategy will be to follow what PQ said--which I don't really agree with--or just lynch scum.

    -vote WrathCyber
    Why don't you do that yourself? I could understand the answer "I don't know what the heck I should do", but you're asking Lag to do it here, so you probably don't view it as impossible... right?
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •