S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition - Page 59
Register

User Tag List

Page 59 of 100 FirstFirst ... 9 49 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 69 ... LastLast
Results 2,901 to 2,950 of 4999
  1. ISO #2901

  2. ISO #2902

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Purple View Post
    @FM-Blue Beard i wanna make surebyou understand that Inco is confirmed scum tied to another player, it sucks for Comrade if the lover thing is true but we have to kill Inco and Tess. Equally!
    So let's start with Tesseract..... I'm not saying it doesn't make sense to kill Inco. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to kill him FIRST.

    I stand by my statement. If EOD rolls around and Inco is still getting voted over Tess I'll shoot in the inco voter pool. It is a day shot.

  3. ISO #2903

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    He can't chose.

    He had to give any item to anyone N0. He hadn't had any interactions yet.

    Giving the death tailor to someone makes most sense because mafia/town will act differently. Town will claim; mafia won't.

    He has no choice on then using the action- he has to guess Kitty's alignment at EOD. If he guesses wrong he dies. He's alive, so he guessed right.

    I do wonder if there's some weird potential w/w going on here but need to logic it out
    I do not like that you are answering this. Its something that needs to provide their reasoning. Immediately gave me the feeling you could be aligned somewhere. Maybe you want to get the pressure off the Tess/Incon/Purple situation?

    @FM-Its SOMETHING
    Can you clarify your thought process on giving a death tailor to someone N0 and also giving it to a player you were willing to bet your life on that they are mafia?

    Also, Why do you scum read Leaf? They are a town read for me.

  4. ISO #2904

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Blue Beard View Post
    So let's start with Tesseract..... I'm not saying it doesn't make sense to kill Inco. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to kill him FIRST.

    I stand by my statement. If EOD rolls around and Inco is still getting voted over Tess I'll shoot in the inco voter pool. It is a day shot.
    This is a direct threat to all voting Inconspicuous over Tess at the moment.

    Make your choice now.
    @FM-Chad Knight , @FM-Purple , @FM-ohno , @FM-Kitty Cat Dance , @FM-Earless Artiste , @FM-Demonic TP , @FM-Mr Pain

  5. ISO #2905

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Blue Beard View Post
    So let's start with Tesseract..... I'm not saying it doesn't make sense to kill Inco. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to kill him FIRST.

    I stand by my statement. If EOD rolls around and Inco is still getting voted over Tess I'll shoot in the inco voter pool. It is a day shot.
    Sounds like Bizaro has sent in a shot so might all be resolved

  6. ISO #2906

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    I do not like that you are answering this. Its something that needs to provide their reasoning. Immediately gave me the feeling you could be aligned somewhere. Maybe you want to get the pressure off the Tess/Incon/Purple situation?

    @FM-Its SOMETHING
    Can you clarify your thought process on giving a death tailor to someone N0 and also giving it to a player you were willing to bet your life on that they are mafia?

    Also, Why do you scum read Leaf? They are a town read for me.
    Begging its something for clarification is just giving them more opportunities to weasel out of that ridiculous move..

  7. ISO #2907

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    I do not like that you are answering this. Its something that needs to provide their reasoning. Immediately gave me the feeling you could be aligned somewhere. Maybe you want to get the pressure off the Tess/Incon/Purple situation?

    @FM-Its SOMETHING
    Can you clarify your thought process on giving a death tailor to someone N0 and also giving it to a player you were willing to bet your life on that they are mafia?

    Also, Why do you scum read Leaf? They are a town read for me.
    I was also wrong with what I said.

    I've come round to thinking its likely w/w

  8. ISO #2908

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Blue Beard View Post
    So let's start with Tesseract..... I'm not saying it doesn't make sense to kill Inco. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to kill him FIRST.

    I stand by my statement. If EOD rolls around and Inco is still getting voted over Tess I'll shoot in the inco voter pool. It is a day shot.
    I favor chopping Tess first. He clears and out a lot of people.

    -vote FM-Tesseract

  9. ISO #2909

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    In my notes I have them as wolf.

    My reads
    1. Villageish on Chage-Kitty-Demonic-Its Something-Blue Beard. Playing like villagers
    2. Oh no seems v
    3. Dark Unicorn(?)

    SCUM
    1. Mafia Bro is not really playing or believing his reads. Mr bones tooo
    2. Mr Pain is illogical with reads and makes strange/bad pushes
    3. Inconspicuous man is red check + lolcating
    4. Purple-Tess red checks and lies! v read them on tone
    What makes you say I don't believe my reads?

    Also "He'S nOt EvEn PlAyInG" is a super outdated read at this point

  10. ISO #2910

  11. ISO #2911

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-ohno View Post
    -There is no factional kill in ?KRC games (except maybe arso), only role KP
    -There is more than one scum faction (counting solos) who can kill.

    with those things in mind how does roleblocking me even remotly implicate im evil? Esoecially considering my role cant even be roleblocked
    Uh, I didn’t say that those things existed. I said they could exist. Don’t put words in my mouth.

  12. ISO #2912

  13. ISO #2913

  14. ISO #2914

  15. ISO #2915

  16. ISO #2916

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    He can't chose.

    He had to give any item to anyone N0. He hadn't had any interactions yet.

    Giving the death tailor to someone makes most sense because mafia/town will act differently. Town will claim; mafia won't.

    He has no choice on then using the action- he has to guess Kitty's alignment at EOD. If he guesses wrong he dies. He's alive, so he guessed right.

    I do wonder if there's some weird potential w/w going on here but need to logic it out
    Possible but not gonna worry about that until cat flips

  17. ISO #2917

  18. ISO #2918

  19. ISO #2919

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    The implication was that he didn't have a choice
    Honestly, do any of you even read mechnics before joining?

    STANDARD "Role Balance" doesnt NOT apply to ?KRC. There can be fucking 25 cops for all we know

    Also, please read someones claim before complaining about sonethibg they did. Something was obligated to submit

  20. ISO #2920

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-ohno View Post
    Honestly, do any of you even read mechnics before joining?

    STANDARD "Role Balance" doesnt NOT apply to ?KRC. There can be fucking 25 cops for all we know

    Also, please read someones claim before complaining about sonethibg they did. Something was obligated to submit
    this is a reply to the person mr bro was replying to

  21. ISO #2921

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    I feel like their claim isn't actually that hard to understand??

    They had to give out an item n0. You know, BEFORE the thread is open. They gave death tailor to kitty. AFTER that, during d1, when the thread was open, they developed a slight scumread on kitty. AFTER giving them the item, because n0 happens before d1. They heavily scumread leaf during d1, and read kitty as being teamed with leaf, so they guessed that kitty was mafia on n1. They did not die, thus kitty is outed from their pov.


    Like it's a bit convoluted as a role, but it's honestly not THAT hard to understand, and anyone saying "WHYD YOU GIVE A SCUMREAD A DEATH TAILOR" isn't reading closely enough cause that isn't what he's claiming

  22. ISO #2922

  23. ISO #2923

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    I feel like their claim isn't actually that hard to understand??

    They had to give out an item n0. You know, BEFORE the thread is open. They gave death tailor to kitty. AFTER that, during d1, when the thread was open, they developed a slight scumread on kitty. AFTER giving them the item, because n0 happens before d1. They heavily scumread leaf during d1, and read kitty as being teamed with leaf, so they guessed that kitty was mafia on n1. They did not die, thus kitty is outed from their pov.


    Like it's a bit convoluted as a role, but it's honestly not THAT hard to understand, and anyone saying "WHYD YOU GIVE A SCUMREAD A DEATH TAILOR" isn't reading closely enough cause that isn't what he's claiming
    Yh I got it straight away. Its simpler than other roles that have flipped

  24. ISO #2924

  25. ISO #2925

  26. ISO #2926

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    I feel like their claim isn't actually that hard to understand??

    They had to give out an item n0. You know, BEFORE the thread is open. They gave death tailor to kitty. AFTER that, during d1, when the thread was open, they developed a slight scumread on kitty. AFTER giving them the item, because n0 happens before d1. They heavily scumread leaf during d1, and read kitty as being teamed with leaf, so they guessed that kitty was mafia on n1. They did not die, thus kitty is outed from their pov.


    Like it's a bit convoluted as a role, but it's honestly not THAT hard to understand, and anyone saying "WHYD YOU GIVE A SCUMREAD A DEATH TAILOR" isn't reading closely enough cause that isn't what he's claiming
    2nd time people are doing this.

    Please do not answer for Its something. Feeding them arguments is anti-town.

    If they are telling the truth they should be able to explain. Explaining for them ruins the reads we could get from their responses. If they are being honest they do not need other people rationalizing their behavior for them.

  27. ISO #2927

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    2nd time people are doing this.

    Please do not answer for Its something. Feeding them arguments is anti-town.

    If they are telling the truth they should be able to explain. Explaining for them ruins the reads we could get from their responses. If they are being honest they do not need other people rationalizing their behavior for them.
    It's literally already in the thread my dude

  28. ISO #2928

  29. ISO #2929

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    Like I'm not putting any words in their mouth, im literally just condensing/streamlining what they've already said.

    It's not my fault I'm better at it than you, don't be a hater bro
    If I thought what they said was clear I would not be asking. Obviously multiple people feel the same. What does it hurt to let them speak for themselves?

  30. ISO #2930

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    If I thought what they said was clear I would not be asking. Obviously multiple people feel the same. What does it hurt to let them speak for themselves?
    Right, so asking for clarification is fine, but don't get pissy about it when someone else restates what's already been said and act as if your inability to understand a straightforward concept is somehow going to catch them out in a lie lol

  31. ISO #2931

  32. ISO #2932

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    Right, so asking for clarification is fine, but don't get pissy about it when someone else restates what's already been said and act as if your inability to understand a straightforward concept is somehow going to catch them out in a lie lol
    I do not feel like that is what you are doing though. I feel like you are making arguments for them. It does not help that I think you are not town but 2 things jumped to my mind when you responded.

    Maybe you want to support anything to draw attention away from the Incon, Tess, Purple situation so maybe there is a wolf in there who you are aligned with?
    Or maybe you are aligned with Its Something and do not feel comfortable letting me examine their thoughts without a bit of coaching?

    Either way I don't trust you and I do not like you answering for Its Something. I am more comfortable with Blue Beard but I also did not like them doing it. If you are doing it in good faith it does not help to make assumptions on behalf of someone else. You should instead want to understand their thought process so you can sort who is lying and make an informed decision with your vote.

  33. ISO #2933

  34. ISO #2934

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    "I don't understand this"

    "Ok, here's the same thing in a simpler form"

    "Fuck you only one person is allowed to explain things"
    Its not about understanding it. Its about getting Something to explain their reasoning so we have more material to analyze the situation with.

  35. ISO #2935

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    No assumptions were made, I literally just restated the information they ALREADY provided. I added none of my own, made no assumptions, added no context.
    No. And with what you said you eliminated potential slips they could have made if they are lying. If you can not see that you might not be as clever as you think you are.

    Either way we should not go into it until they Its Something responds unless you want to screw up the situation more and coach them.

  36. ISO #2936

  37. ISO #2937

  38. ISO #2938

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    No. And with what you said you eliminated potential slips they could have made if they are lying. If you can not see that you might not be as clever as you think you are.

    Either way we should not go into it until they Its Something responds unless you want to screw up the situation more and coach them.
    Its not my fault you can't read lol

  39. ISO #2939

  40. ISO #2940

  41. ISO #2941

  42. ISO #2942

  43. ISO #2943

  44. ISO #2944

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-ohno View Post
    Honestly, do any of you even read mechnics before joining?

    STANDARD "Role Balance" doesnt NOT apply to ?KRC. There can be fucking 25 cops for all we know

    Also, please read someones claim before complaining about sonethibg they did. Something was obligated to submit
    They were not obligated to choose death tailor though? Did they?

  45. ISO #2945

  46. ISO #2946

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Mafia Bro View Post
    Of all the conversations in the thread somehow this is the dumbest. Incredible stuff.
    Telling yourself everyone else is stupid when you do not understand why multiple people have the same issue is one way to justify your ignorance.

    ...Or you could watch what other people are doing to get a read on what they are thinking and looking at? Even if I am the ignorant one in this situation you could still read me based on my behavior instead of attacking me for asking a question to someone else. It really makes me feel like you are not objective in this situation and have some interest in this lynch past the potential of Kitty being Mafia.

  47. ISO #2947

  48. ISO #2948

  49. ISO #2949

  50. ISO #2950

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    Telling yourself everyone else is stupid when you do not understand why multiple people have the same issue is one way to justify your ignorance.

    ...Or you could watch what other people are doing to get a read on what they are thinking and looking at? Even if I am the ignorant one in this situation you could still read me based on my behavior instead of attacking me for asking a question to someone else. It really makes me feel like you are not objective in this situation and have some interest in this lynch past the potential of Kitty being Mafia.
    Ok boomer

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •