S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition - Page 38
Register

User Tag List

Page 38 of 100 FirstFirst ... 28 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 48 88 ... LastLast
Results 1,851 to 1,900 of 4999
  1. ISO #1851

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    I am quite bothered by FM-Is that a leaf suddenly coming to Eyes's help. I apologize for my whole mixup, my whole case on not wanting to chop Eyes was a combination of how I viewed ISO strongly coupled with what I thought was their role-claim which I viewed advantageous to town. I have to scrap all of that now and it sucks that I have so little time to do it due to my own error.

    I am starting to suspect Eyes and Leaf are a scum team.

    Started with p1360 asking everyone else to explain why Eyes and Purple.

    And then this https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...010#post960010

    and this
    https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...020#post960020

    and this
    https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...028#post960028
    Ues fcking multiquote postfamer

  2. ISO #1852

  3. ISO #1853

  4. ISO #1854

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post


    Hello!

    As part of my role I got a bunch of information but to make it useful I need to know what people did or who they visited.

    I understand you may not be able to claim- but if you can- please can you tag me and let me know what you did?

    it will help village greatly
    @FM-Father and Sun I don't think it can possibly hurt to tell you that I did nothing xD.

    Why'd you say Mafia has a "not good energy"? I certainly don't oppose voting him, but I would like some explanations.

  5. ISO #1855

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    The implication is that Eyes was the town-equivalent of a Lover role. So it is not surprising for Inconspicuous to be a non-town Lover. But they are tied up with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. So if a better lynch exists then I would prefer lynching a potential 3P Lover tied up with a Townie as the two of them are good for 2 votes on town's behalf. If Inconspicuous is a mafia/factional Lover, then we definitely need to get them sooner or later, but they are not really going anywhere. Now, I believe you should know that I feel that a better lynch exists, right?

    What is the confusion? They never got to use their role. But the role was to pick someone to fall in love with N1 and they would learn their rolecard. They could send a day msg (without revealing themselves). They could do a lookout check on their loved target. They could protect their loved target as a BG. And they could either sacrifice self or take vengeance if the loved target got lynched.
    Lol this is my confusion.


    I'll reread the role reveal

  6. ISO #1856

  7. ISO #1857

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    On the Myopia train, I have strong faith in Mr Pain, Chad Knight, myself obviously and to some extent Dark Unicorn (I don't remember why I trusted them, so that's a bit problematic, but anyway). As for Comrade, I have no real opinion of them, and CBI is just a low poster - the flip will help solve him no matter what, and his presence on the train does not indicate anything bad.

    People on the Purple train are all null at best, scummy at worst. I don't trust that.

    People on the Eyes train are suspicious except for Kitty, and Eyes themselves are a weak-ish town player who got attacked early on, not scum.
    Person x being a lynch voter on person y NEVER solves person x
    NEVER
    LETS Assume i would have died yesterday. What would that have made implying for cbi? What would be his solve?

  8. ISO #1858

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    The implication is that Eyes was the town-equivalent of a Lover role. So it is not surprising for Inconspicuous to be a non-town Lover. But they are tied up with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. So if a better lynch exists then I would prefer lynching a potential 3P Lover tied up with a Townie as the two of them are good for 2 votes on town's behalf. If Inconspicuous is a mafia/factional Lover, then we definitely need to get them sooner or later, but they are not really going anywhere. Now, I believe you should know that I feel that a better lynch exists, right?

    What is the confusion? They never got to use their role. But the role was to pick someone to fall in love with N1 and they would learn their rolecard. They could send a day msg (without revealing themselves). They could do a lookout check on their loved target. They could protect their loved target as a BG. And they could either sacrifice self or take vengeance if the loved target got lynched.
    OK I've reread.

    How do we know inconspicuous is a lover?

    And what's the tie to Comrade?

  9. ISO #1859

  10. ISO #1860

  11. ISO #1861

  12. ISO #1862

  13. ISO #1863

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    On the Myopia train, I have strong faith in Mr Pain, Chad Knight, myself obviously and to some extent Dark Unicorn (I don't remember why I trusted them, so that's a bit problematic, but anyway). As for Comrade, I have no real opinion of them, and CBI is just a low poster - the flip will help solve him no matter what, and his presence on the train does not indicate anything bad.

    People on the Purple train are all null at best, scummy at worst. I don't trust that.

    People on the Eyes train are suspicious except for Kitty, and Eyes themselves are a weak-ish town player who got attacked early on, not scum.
    This fcing wagon analysis by voterz on the train makes me bleurgh even more

  14. ISO #1864

  15. ISO #1865

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    @FM-Father and Sun I don't think it can possibly hurt to tell you that I did nothing xD.

    Why'd you say Mafia has a "not good energy"? I certainly don't oppose voting him, but I would like some explanations.
    He's chucking out reads, not explaining them/trying to get people on them. Its like he doesn't believe them

  16. ISO #1866

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    Lol this is my confusion.


    I'll reread the role reveal
    I noticed I made a typo in my previous response to you. My attorneys and I have correct the record in bold text below. Like, I know we should consider eliminating neutrals, but I am far more worried about group scum than some solo lover (if that's what Inconspicuous is, which I think is likely). And if this lover is part of the group scum, they are not going anywhere anyway.

    The implication is that Eyes was the town-equivalent of a Lover role. So it is not surprising for Inconspicuous to be a non-town Lover. But they are tied up with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. So if a better lynch exists then I would prefer NOT lynching a potential 3P Lover tied up with a Townie as the two of them are good for 2 votes on town's behalf. If Inconspicuous is a mafia/factional Lover, then we definitely need to get them sooner or later, but they are not really going anywhere. Now, I believe you should know that I feel that a better lynch exists, right?

    What is the confusion? They never got to use their role. But the role was to pick someone to fall in love with N1 and they would learn their rolecard. They could send a day msg (without revealing themselves). They could do a lookout check on their loved target. They could protect their loved target as a BG. And they could either sacrifice self or take vengeance if the loved target got lynched.

  17. ISO #1867

  18. ISO #1868

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Comrade PickleRadish View Post
    Let the record show that Pain and Tesseract both tried to encourage me not to come in as a tiebreaker. I may be a weird art-stealing role, but I am town first and foremost, and them trying to direct my vote off of Myopia is something to take notice of.
    they said the same things before you voted me
    Stop trying to tie me and some randos that have been voting me at that time myself
    Like they both voted me and wanted the best for you to be safe and not roleblocked and then you say they wanted to safe me?
    Wtf?!?

  19. ISO #1869

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    I noticed I made a typo in my previous response to you. My attorneys and I have correct the record in bold text below. Like, I know we should consider eliminating neutrals, but I am far more worried about group scum than some solo lover (if that's what Inconspicuous is, which I think is likely). And if this lover is part of the group scum, they are not going anywhere anyway.

    The implication is that Eyes was the town-equivalent of a Lover role. So it is not surprising for Inconspicuous to be a non-town Lover. But they are tied up with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. So if a better lynch exists then I would prefer NOT lynching a potential 3P Lover tied up with a Townie as the two of them are good for 2 votes on town's behalf. If Inconspicuous is a mafia/factional Lover, then we definitely need to get them sooner or later, but they are not really going anywhere. Now, I believe you should know that I feel that a better lynch exists, right?

    What is the confusion? They never got to use their role. But the role was to pick someone to fall in love with N1 and they would learn their rolecard. They could send a day msg (without revealing themselves). They could do a lookout check on their loved target. They could protect their loved target as a BG. And they could either sacrifice self or take vengeance if the loved target got lynched.
    Ok my questions:
    1) Where do eyes & comrade get tied? How?
    2) Where do comrade & inconspicuous get tied? How?
    3) Are we treating the red check on inconspicuous to be based on speculation on their being 3 different lover roles, each with different alignments?

  20. ISO #1870

  21. ISO #1871

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    OK I've reread.

    How do we know inconspicuous is a lover?

    And what's the tie to Comrade?
    Comrade revealed relatively early in D1 that they were in love with Inconspicuous. Inconspicuous also confirms it (see his D2). I believe Comrade is town, so if we lynch Inconspicuous, then Comrade will die along with them. If Inconspicuous is a neutral solo Lover, then he should be voting with Comrade (or at least per Comrade's recommendations). So if Comrade is town, as I think they are, then this counts for 2 votes on town's behalf. If we lynch one of them, then we lost those 2 votes. Yes, it is possible that Inconspicuous is not a solo Lover but more like a mafia heartbreaker, but he is not going anywhere and can be dealt with. For instance, Myopia can check them (provided it's checking actual alignment and not just "not town") or can be roleblocked or shot or lynched later on, if we have a better lynch candidate in mind for today. Lastly, Inconspicuous could be town lover, but I doubt it because Eyes was that sort of role and I doubt we would have two town-affiliated lover-type roles. Plus Purple's alleged investigation says Inconspicuous is "not town".

  22. ISO #1872

  23. ISO #1873

  24. ISO #1874

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Dark Unicorn View Post
    A few things pertinent to current conversation that caught my attention catching up

    Mafia Bro's behavior from 1646 to 1648 was an issue.


    If anything I could make a 'too scummy to be scum' argument here in that they are hard defending Myopia who was the counter train to the town flip followed by shifting to a double kill lynch potential. But holy shit this is some scummy behavior.

    For the much larger issue-
    Just to say it up front I had problems with Tesseract's eod1 before saying this. It absolutely felt like they were more pushing against the Myopia train than pushing for the Eyes lynch which felt very weird to me. Although I liked that they were pushing original thoughts the way they were going about it felt bad and it looked like they backtracked before the day ended like they knew it was going to end badly.
    The way they intentionally post farmed and admitted it would grow their power was an issue (honestly I am kinda irked nobody else saw as a problem given they didn't want to even talk about 'how' it grew their power) Even now does nobody else have issues with this? We literally just allowed for someone to gain power and they claimed double votes with no reveal in a setup where roles are not AI. Who is to say if we just created a scum mayor or what other functions they may have?
    D2 they go hard information over analysis while slipping on a confidence tell. In 1688 "Everyone knew Inconspicuous was non-town yesterday except, apparently, you."
    Consider what is said here. It speaks to absolute certainty without reasoning. It also does not fit with their actions in that if they were so sure Inconspicuous is scum they should be hammering on that point while instead they are just referring to it as a counter point to some shit? Nah. Even if they want to claim some mechanical reason for this belief this is not how a town player with mechanical info that someone is scum behaves. This feels like a form of hard slip to me. I do not see a world where this thought process was made in good faith.
    Someone did what I did not have the time to do with Tesseract? Amazing. I wholeheartedly agree with this post: it puts words and quotes (well, post numbers) on what I was feeling. Tesseract's EoD really did not sit right with me, and Eyes' town flip strenghtened that thought. The fact his day start was quite different and didn't even address EoD, the supposed association between me and Eyes, or really anything I was expecting is making me suspect him.

    Other than that, Purple apparently has a red check on Inconspicuous Man? That will end up being informative, no matter what happens. And while I don't particularly trust Purple, I trust Inconspicuous even less, considering he hasn't provided anything about the game itself (outside of "don't kill me"). I know what it is like to have little time to play the game, and I know that it's perfectly possible to at least provide preliminary reads based on individual posts; it's really not that hard.


    So, to sum it up, my scum pool right now would be:

    Myopia
    Tesseract (potentially linked to Myopia considering EoD1)
    Inconspicuous Man

    And a little further from my preoccupation but still present:

    Something ("giving permission" to shoot someone who wasn't even specified properly, being on the Eyes train for reasons, having been active in the first half of D1 but not towny)
    Purple (if their red check is bogus)

    The rest are not necessarily towny, but they are at least not worth mentioning in my active scumreads.

  25. ISO #1875

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    Ok my questions:
    1) Where do eyes & comrade get tied? How?
    2) Where do comrade & inconspicuous get tied? How?
    3) Are we treating the red check on inconspicuous to be based on speculation on their being 3 different lover roles, each with different alignments?
    1) They are not
    2) See my previous post. Did you not follow what Comrade said D1 and what Inconspicuous said D2?
    3) We need to better define "red check". What Purple says he got is "not town" - that does not necessarily mean a multi-player scum faction (which is my top concern), it could be a solo 3P neutral in love with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. I have not speculated about any additional lover roles (unless we cound SB16 parasite as one, but the nature of that one is unknown, whereas the others are known). We have not had anyone claim to have a 3rd lover relationship, so I am not sure where you are getting the number 3 from. But now that you mention it, if the SB16 parasitic infection (which sounds to be applied to Dark Unicorn) is a love-type relationship, then the quantity 3 makes sense and your comment about each having a different alignment could have merit. Still waiting to hear more from Unicorn on what, if anything, he has learned about his infection on N1. So far I just know we had 1 town lover-type role (Eyes) and we have a claim from Incons and Comrade about a 2nd one.

  26. ISO #1876

  27. ISO #1877

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    Someone did what I did not have the time to do with Tesseract? Amazing. I wholeheartedly agree with this post: it puts words and quotes (well, post numbers) on what I was feeling. Tesseract's EoD really did not sit right with me, and Eyes' town flip strenghtened that thought. The fact his day start was quite different and didn't even address EoD, the supposed association between me and Eyes, or really anything I was expecting is making me suspect him.

    Other than that, Purple apparently has a red check on Inconspicuous Man? That will end up being informative, no matter what happens. And while I don't particularly trust Purple, I trust Inconspicuous even less, considering he hasn't provided anything about the game itself (outside of "don't kill me"). I know what it is like to have little time to play the game, and I know that it's perfectly possible to at least provide preliminary reads based on individual posts; it's really not that hard.


    So, to sum it up, my scum pool right now would be:

    Myopia
    Tesseract (potentially linked to Myopia considering EoD1)
    Inconspicuous Man

    And a little further from my preoccupation but still present:

    Something ("giving permission" to shoot someone who wasn't even specified properly, being on the Eyes train for reasons, having been active in the first half of D1 but not towny)
    Purple (if their red check is bogus)

    The rest are not necessarily towny, but they are at least not worth mentioning in my active scumreads.
    What it sounds like you both are saying is that Mafia Bro & Tesseract worked hard defended Myopia and that this links them all together

    I'll got read eod.

    Always makes sense to kill off counter wagons NIGHTMARE

    I quite like Myopia's energy & analysis today.

  28. ISO #1878

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    I noticed I made a typo in my previous response to you. My attorneys and I have correct the record in bold text below. Like, I know we should consider eliminating neutrals, but I am far more worried about group scum than some solo lover (if that's what Inconspicuous is, which I think is likely). And if this lover is part of the group scum, they are not going anywhere anyway.

    The implication is that Eyes was the town-equivalent of a Lover role. So it is not surprising for Inconspicuous to be a non-town Lover. But they are tied up with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. So if a better lynch exists then I would prefer NOT lynching a potential 3P Lover tied up with a Townie as the two of them are good for 2 votes on town's behalf. If Inconspicuous is a mafia/factional Lover, then we definitely need to get them sooner or later, but they are not really going anywhere. Now, I believe you should know that I feel that a better lynch exists, right?

    What is the confusion? They never got to use their role. But the role was to pick someone to fall in love with N1 and they would learn their rolecard. They could send a day msg (without revealing themselves). They could do a lookout check on their loved target. They could protect their loved target as a BG. And they could either sacrifice self or take vengeance if the loved target got lynched.
    Look. My check was one shot, but i got another one today that i can clear you with.

    Im an one shot lie detector and i can clear you if you post in the thread without quoting ne or anything else.

    “I am town”

    Post that, then i will quote that to the host privately and i will get a response as soon as they see it. Then i will let everyone know here the result.

  29. ISO #1879

  30. ISO #1880

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    1) They are not
    2) See my previous post. Did you not follow what Comrade said D1 and what Inconspicuous said D2?
    3) We need to better define "red check". What Purple says he got is "not town" - that does not necessarily mean a multi-player scum faction (which is my top concern), it could be a solo 3P neutral in love with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. I have not speculated about any additional lover roles (unless we cound SB16 parasite as one, but the nature of that one is unknown, whereas the others are known). We have not had anyone claim to have a 3rd lover relationship, so I am not sure where you are getting the number 3 from. But now that you mention it, if the SB16 parasitic infection (which sounds to be applied to Dark Unicorn) is a love-type relationship, then the quantity 3 makes sense and your comment about each having a different alignment could have merit. Still waiting to hear more from Unicorn on what, if anything, he has learned about his infection on N1. So far I just know we had 1 town lover-type role (Eyes) and we have a claim from Incons and Comrade about a 2nd one.

    OK thanks I've just been trying to cobble it together. Think I'm there now.

    I am going to go read this red check by purple

  31. ISO #1881

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Its SOMETHING View Post
    You have my permission to shoot him instead.
    He's Mafia 100%

    I can explain myself, some, but not now.
    I contracted a bloody virus and didn't even catch up because of that. I'm on phone in bed now.

    Which is why I'll go off 24h or so
    Looks like SOMETHING invested a bunch of money into weak zappers and got bad aim.
    Is the cliam real?

  32. ISO #1882

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    I noticed I made a typo in my previous response to you. My attorneys and I have correct the record in bold text below. Like, I know we should consider eliminating neutrals, but I am far more worried about group scum than some solo lover (if that's what Inconspicuous is, which I think is likely). And if this lover is part of the group scum, they are not going anywhere anyway.

    The implication is that Eyes was the town-equivalent of a Lover role. So it is not surprising for Inconspicuous to be a non-town Lover. But they are tied up with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. So if a better lynch exists then I would prefer NOT lynching a potential 3P Lover tied up with a Townie as the two of them are good for 2 votes on town's behalf. If Inconspicuous is a mafia/factional Lover, then we definitely need to get them sooner or later, but they are not really going anywhere. Now, I believe you should know that I feel that a better lynch exists, right?

    What is the confusion? They never got to use their role. But the role was to pick someone to fall in love with N1 and they would learn their rolecard. They could send a day msg (without revealing themselves). They could do a lookout check on their loved target. They could protect their loved target as a BG. And they could either sacrifice self or take vengeance if the loved target got lynched.
    Even if inconspicuous is 3p, what exactly is stopping them from being antitown 3p?

  33. ISO #1883

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Is that a leaf View Post
    I strongly doubt whoever has been shooting me is town, considering nobody even voiced suspicion against me apart from Tesseract, who voices surprise at the shots. Shooting people without discussing is not exactly pro-town.

    Also, in case I end up actually dying at some point, PLEASE DO REMEMBER THAT THE EYES TRAIN WAS SUSPICIOUS AS HECK AND INDEED RESULTED IN A TOWNIE'S DEATH.
    Yea yeah empty blah blah after flip trying to look good

  34. ISO #1884

  35. ISO #1885

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    1) They are not
    2) See my previous post. Did you not follow what Comrade said D1 and what Inconspicuous said D2?
    3) We need to better define "red check". What Purple says he got is "not town" - that does not necessarily mean a multi-player scum faction (which is my top concern), it could be a solo 3P neutral in love with Comrade, whom I believe to be town. I have not speculated about any additional lover roles (unless we cound SB16 parasite as one, but the nature of that one is unknown, whereas the others are known). We have not had anyone claim to have a 3rd lover relationship, so I am not sure where you are getting the number 3 from. But now that you mention it, if the SB16 parasitic infection (which sounds to be applied to Dark Unicorn) is a love-type relationship, then the quantity 3 makes sense and your comment about each having a different alignment could have merit. Still waiting to hear more from Unicorn on what, if anything, he has learned about his infection on N1. So far I just know we had 1 town lover-type role (Eyes) and we have a claim from Incons and Comrade about a 2nd one.
    I lied. My check is more defined, i dont only just get “town not town”. Now please post “im town” so i can lie detect you before i death tunnel you, i need to make sure your point of view is from town please.

  36. ISO #1886

  37. ISO #1887

  38. ISO #1888

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Kitty Cat Dance View Post
    Even if inconspicuous is 3p, what exactly is stopping them from being antitown 3p?
    I get that comrade is tied together with them, but we can't keep them both alive under the pretense that inconspicuous might happen to be benign. If there's a red check (or anti town check) against someone, the 1-1 trade off is fine in my opinion.

  39. ISO #1889

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Myopia View Post
    Hmm yeah dang man your pfp has more than 50% red of the pixels
    Thats red it shows you are mafia and evil russian
    Thats a scum slip lets lynch you


    [Hk][/hk]
    See how thats a totally bullshit reason?
    SEE IT?!?
    thats why im tilted, because this community always had and always will have strange brains (exchange strange with another s word)
    I mean - yes. Im not fully focused on the game here, i talk about off topic things, yes, thats -ev, im trying to get better, be more focused, yes you are right, i suck at that, even in non anon games, i talk shit, not game related, thats a manko of me. Accepted, am trying my best.

    But when TYPING and TYPO and GRAMMAR misstakes are considered AI IN EITHER WAY
    THAN THAS FUCCING BAFFLING
    ITS RVS? - OK, THEN ITS ACCEPTABLE, FUNNY META JOKE HAHA WE ALL LAUGHED.
    But other than that- im mutherfuccing raging
    Being terribly hard to read (as in hard to read letters, not hard to read your slot) is anti-town at best and scummy at worst. I can agree with saying it's just anti-town, but that still means you would have to stop :P. You're actually the single source of negativity I've seen here, and you're not a source of information. That's anti-town. If you want to be anti-town, fine, but I want you to die in that case. The EoD stuff only strenghtens this position.

  40. ISO #1890

  41. ISO #1891

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Kitty Cat Dance View Post
    Even if inconspicuous is 3p, what exactly is stopping them from being antitown 3p?
    Being tied up in love with a town member, which I think Comrade is. Their win condition should be tied to the person they are in love with, such as surviving and also making sure that their loved one (Comrade) survives as well. Why don't we ask the Man himself to get more info anyway? He should give more info about his role and conditions unless he is ready to get chopped.

  42. ISO #1892

  43. ISO #1893

  44. ISO #1894

  45. ISO #1895

  46. ISO #1896

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Father and Sun View Post
    He's chucking out reads, not explaining them/trying to get people on them. Its like he doesn't believe them
    It could be that, yes. Or it could be laziness. I'm honestly not sure. If he doesn't elaborate on his reads, though, there is no reason for him to have the benefit of doubt.

  47. ISO #1897

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    Being tied up in love with a town member, which I think Comrade is. Their win condition should be tied to the person they are in love with, such as surviving and also making sure that their loved one (Comrade) survives as well. Why don't we ask the Man himself to get more info anyway? He should give more info about his role and conditions unless he is ready to get chopped.
    It's just as likely that they're not benign.

    You realize that if Man is a packwolf or evil 3p, you're basically giving him a free fake claim here, right?

    If your plan was to just ask him about his role like you say here, you pretty much nullified anything that would do now.

    I don't think you're scum, but you really didn't think this through.

  48. ISO #1898

  49. ISO #1899

  50. ISO #1900

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •