S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition - Page 20
Register

User Tag List

Page 20 of 100 FirstFirst ... 10 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 30 70 ... LastLast
Results 951 to 1,000 of 4999
  1. ISO #951

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Eyes View Post
    Come one, come all.. I'm about to drop A-bomb bombshell.

    Chad is a wolf. This post is outing.

    If you notice at the end he says "it could be a strong role for town or a strong role for town."
    Obviously it's a typo. But why you ask? It is because initially he wrote "it could be a strong role for scum or a strong role for town." Now he sits there staring at a screen worried worried that writing "scum" first would make people think he was a wolf, with scum on the mind. He quickly changes the 1st word to "town." In doing so he forgets to change the 2nd word back to scum.

    Join me, comrades.

    -vote FM-Chad Knight
    Actually, Sure.

    -vote FM-Chad Knight


    It would also help sort Tess. I feel like this is a good place for pressure right now

  2. ISO #952

  3. ISO #953

  4. ISO #954

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Tesseract View Post
    If you want a good laugh, I had to decide whether I wanted to read 14 pages (not that many) vs ISOing people. I decided to do something different. Can you guess what it is? Brownie points for ya lulz.
    I think you started from the back, then followed a quote chain wherever it tool you until you had somehow got the gist of everything.

  5. ISO #955

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Comrade PickleRadish View Post
    But I gotta say, being pressured into disclosing more about my role is kinda bad for town. Its unlikely we have 3 reliable protectives to protect 3 highly valuable targets: me, tessract, and that guy with some other voting power whatever it was.

    Ok, so think back to Arcade. Usually, out of a 15 player setup, theres 9 town, a 3-player scum team, and 3 other scum who dont know eachother and 1 or 2 of which might not actually be scum at all.

    9/15 = 60%

    so assuming that this KRC setup somewhat adheres to this 60-20-20 ratio, we prob have about 14 to 15 town. 3 protectives for 3 high value targets, and the other 8-9 townies might as well go fuck themselves. Now if this ?KRC ended up similar to your typical Arcade setup, then town might stand a chance. But if theres more than 1 scum team, or if theres a bunch of neutrals, then we may be in a more precarious situation.
    Discouraging cohesion from the town? Tsk tsk.

  6. ISO #956

  7. ISO #957

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Eyes View Post
    Discouraging cohesion from the town? Tsk tsk.
    well i believe i made a miscalculation in my original post now that im looking back at it.

    Assuming in a usual arcade setup, usually 2-4 prots show up, but on average 2. There's three targets with self-proclaimed importance that scum would want to target as soon as they can: my art-stealing ass, the mayor Tesseract, and that "towncore-forming" guy, of who his name escapes me but check back at around pages 2 to 8 and ctrl-F "towncore".

    my original post didnt scale up the "2 prots on average" of a 15 player setup up to a 24 player setup, of which we are in rn. Again, assuming this setup rando'd out to be similar to an arcade 933 in the back end, we have somewhere ranging from 1 to 6 prots, with an average of 3 prots, in a 24 player setup. Persumably. But seeing that we are playing a completely unknown setup, we may not actually have that "average" amount of 3 prots. Most likely smaller.

  8. ISO #958

  9. ISO #959

  10. ISO #960

  11. ISO #961

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Eyes View Post
    If earliste artiste is a wolf then so is whoever he unvoted. Otherwise he is probably just town.

    Bluebeard is also probably town unless there are wolves saying "mafia" instead of "non-town" or among the people getting flak for "tmi" by saying mafia
    I unvoted Pain because he was already being voted by others and I made it very clear he was a rvs vote (and we were out of rvs), and I didn't agree with the people voting them for their over the top going after SOMETHING for a tmi slip. But yeah, I'm definitely the ladder as opposed to the former.

  12. ISO #962

  13. ISO #963

  14. ISO #964

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Earless Artiste View Post
    I unvoted Pain because he was already being voted by others and I made it very clear he was a rvs vote (and we were out of rvs), and I didn't agree with the people voting them for their over the top going after SOMETHING for a tmi slip. But yeah, I'm definitely the ladder as opposed to the former.
    Just to clarify, I'm not saying whatever SOMETHING said was a tmi slip. I don't think it was at all.

  15. ISO #965

  16. ISO #966

  17. ISO #967

  18. ISO #968

  19. ISO #969

  20. ISO #970

  21. ISO #971

  22. ISO #972

  23. ISO #973

  24. ISO #974

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Eyes View Post
    Come one, come all.. I'm about to drop A-bomb bombshell.

    Chad is a wolf. This post is outing.

    If you notice at the end he says "it could be a strong role for town or a strong role for town."
    Obviously it's a typo. But why you ask? It is because initially he wrote "it could be a strong role for scum or a strong role for town." Now he sits there staring at a screen worried worried that writing "scum" first would make people think he was a wolf, with scum on the mind. He quickly changes the 1st word to "town." In doing so he forgets to change the 2nd word back to scum.

    Join me, comrades.

    -vote FM-Chad Knight
    I laughed. I have never thought about a post that much as wolf, or as town.

    Or, as town or as wolf.

    Or, as town or as town.

  25. ISO #975

  26. ISO #976

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Arcade View Post
    I'll change my strategy.

    I'll fuck up two out of four slots tomorrow and I'll reveal their night feedback regardless of alignment on Day 2
    FM-Chad Knight, FM-Myopia, FM-Mafia Bro, FM-CBI Agent
    Are you revealing it publicly, or just to yourself?

    If you reveal it publicly I encourage that. Everyone benefits from my rolecard feedback being public. I actually think it would make my role broken.

  27. ISO #977

  28. ISO #978

  29. ISO #979

  30. ISO #980

  31. ISO #981

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    Are you revealing it publicly, or just to yourself?

    If you reveal it publicly I encourage that. Everyone benefits from my rolecard feedback being public. I actually think it would make my role broken.
    Yes, publicly. For Free

    But next bid starts at 100,000 after I finished my primary objective to those four slots...

    As we move forward. Go down the list, you are the first in line. So I vote you, then I follow through FM-Myopia, FM-Mafia Bro, FM-CBI Agent
    Are you revealing it publicly, or just to yourself?

  32. ISO #982

  33. ISO #983

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Arcade View Post
    Yes, publicly. For Free

    But next bid starts at 100,000 after I finished my primary objective to those four slots...

    As we move forward. Go down the list, you are the first in line. So I vote you, then I follow through FM-Myopia, FM-Mafia Bro, FM-CBI Agent
    Are you revealing it publicly, or just to yourself?
    If you can genuinely make all of my role feedback public each night then I think that would be incredibly smart, as I am an investigative role.

  34. ISO #984

  35. ISO #985

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    This is not an apology. This is an excuse.

    You may be 3p ingame but you are scum IRL.
    Wow... Calling me scum IRL just because we are using the swastika as our symbol.

    Well sir. I just want to say that your views are really not really our problem. We had it first. So our usage of swastika will continue and nothing will change for us.

  36. ISO #986

  37. ISO #987

  38. ISO #988

  39. ISO #989

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Comrade PickleRadish View Post
    We should vote Arcade for being a Nazi. Unless we want to get a lil risky and straight up solve another slot via lynch.

    -vote FM-Arcade
    Yeah sure bro.

    There are over 5 billion people who are fine using the swastika as of today

    You are the minority here, not me.

  40. ISO #990

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Comrade PickleRadish View Post
    We should vote Arcade for being a Nazi. Unless we want to get a lil risky and straight up solve another slot via lynch.

    -vote FM-Arcade
    He’s going to be modkilled for a second violation of FM rules. I’m not going to waste my time nor bother myself by investigating or engaging him further. He is either obtuse or a troll.

  41. ISO #991

  42. ISO #992

  43. ISO #993

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    "Taking pressure off yourself" is such a standard book refute. That's not a defense and it's not even an argument that I'm wrong. And supposed pressure? How tuned in to kitty are you to think I'm under immense pressure that I'd feel the need to actively do something about it? Why wouldn't I just try to attack pain or Arcade or someone else who's cringe?
    Lol, ok wolf

  44. ISO #994

  45. ISO #995

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Eyes View Post
    "Taking pressure off yourself" is such a standard book refute. That's not a defense and it's not even an argument that I'm wrong. And supposed pressure? How tuned in to kitty are you to think I'm under immense pressure that I'd feel the need to actively do something about it? Why wouldn't I just try to attack pain or Arcade or someone else who's cringe?
    Lol, ok wolf
    What is there to refute? Your argument (if it can be called that) is flimsier than a house made of paper. The wind could blow it away. What are you expecting me to respond to it with? How do I respond to a hollow push? You created a fantasy scenario where I am scum because I wrote town twice absentmindedly. There isn’t anything to address or defend.

    Two of my townreads and one of my nullreads were already voting you. I’m happy to join them.

  46. ISO #996

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Chad Knight View Post
    What is there to refute? Your argument (if it can be called that) is flimsier than a house made of paper. The wind could blow it away. What are you expecting me to respond to it with? How do I respond to a hollow push? You created a fantasy scenario where I am scum because I wrote town twice absentmindedly. There isn’t anything to address or defend.

    Two of my townreads and one of my nullreads were already voting you. I’m happy to join them.
    All houses are made of paper when you think about it. Are all arguments then invalid? You seem to be saying so. Is that why you resort to games tate reads that aren't fully formed yet?

  47. ISO #997

  48. ISO #998

    Re: S-FM 339: ?KRC, M-FM edition

    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Eyes View Post
    All houses are made of paper when you think about it. Are all arguments then invalid? You seem to be saying so. Is that why you resort to games tate reads that aren't fully formed yet?
    What?

    Houses are normally made of brick. Or wood. Not paper.

    Not to break character but what the fuck are you talking about?

  49. ISO #999

  50. ISO #1000

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •