Quote Originally Posted by Lag View Post
@Marshmallow Marshall
Would like to know why you never quoted the hidden phrase I included in the message as a gotcha against people that didn't actually read my post.

Makes me think you didn't actually read the post, just skimmed it to try to see if I agreed with you or not, saw that there wasn't any hard statements in that particular post and therefore labeled it as "bad" without actually thinking about what I was saying.

Also would like to know what your thoughts are after you read #1412 because we reach the same conclusions on PQ, and in that post I clarified that all the other posts are just day 1 analysis, since I needed to recalibrate my reads this game after getting tilted.

Like the fact that we actually agreed on reads but you're responding to the post as if I disagree with you feels like you didn't actually read the post and then respond based on your thoughts on what I was saying. Instead you skimmed it to see if you agree/disagree with the conclusion and then labeled it bad because you think you disagree
Lmao because I had not finished reading your wall and went off before having the time to finish it. You'll have to forgive me for not reading an enormous wall entirely in one shot because it takes a lot of time to critically analyze :P.

I went back and actually finished reading it, and yes, okay, it works. I did read the PQ-specific post I quoted, though (had already done so yesterday and re-read it today), and as I said, while it does incriminate PQ, it keeps a door open. The conclusion post clearly positions yourself, though, so I guess that's less of an issue, even though it's still possible for you to escape having to lynch PQ if you don't hammer on the very, very clear point that he deflected the lynch twice and that scums saved him; this might well be just me being paranoid, though, so I'm not going to hold that against you too much, especially considering how you are doubling down on it rn.

As for the final conclusion, I agree with Renegade being with PQ: it makes sense considering Renegade himself, who has committed the heinous crime of not being towny + who nicely fits in considering where he ended up placing his votes - and yes, I know you disagree with the concept of "crime of not being towny" being applied to Renegade, but I still think he's able to produce somewhat town-indicative posts as town. I did not see any in this game.
As for Paopan, I have more doubts. He certainly has not been pro-town, to say the least, but sadly, I don't think that is AI for him... However, things like the potential derpclear (not knowing Loldebite had been killed) or the list of reads you included in your post about him (which is really genuine-looking, considering the "MM pocked me successfully and is a low-lying bastard if scum", the consistency of the Voss scumread over time, and the "no excessive AtE from Stealth" read, which is frankly accurate enough) make him look more towny than not imo. I think scum may have been considering him as a blessing for his, uh, skill level, just like PQ and I did in UoaTitW when we were scum together and he was town mayor.

Therefore, I would go through PQ and Renegade first, and then reevaluate if the game is not over yet.