personally for me..
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
Either Way In The Heat Of The Moment I Figure Frinckles Is Actress And Marshmallow Marshall Is On Scum Team As Well.. They Will Never Confess To Their Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheep.. But This Is My Analysis..
The only townie good enough to get banned for game-throwing in games that he wins.
-vote Gikkle
Tossin my vote here. I have places to go to, and I don't like hijackers! Especially not on the Frinckles Cruise line.
@Marshmallow Marshall
What are your thoughts on 158?
Also, do you still townread ZZ? Mindmelding over townreading someone who presumably only troll posts looked weird to me tbh. I know you jump back and forth in your reading though. But fmpov, I seemed to dislike multiple Gikkle posts on my 1st catching up (though their ISO looks clean?) whereas your only interaction with them was over a mindmeld when townread someone who presumably only troll posts.
Btw, how do you imagine someone to have Mafia intent when they haven't read their role card? There has to be more reasoning supporting that because on face value it looks contradictory.
Also, I'm still not sure how I stood in the way of RVS by suggesting 2 other RVS votes. If my understanding of math is correct then the change from the number 1 to number 3 is an increase not a decrease. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
Got possible bussing SvS vibes too, though weakly so.
But why did you ask us to change votes from NP to Gikkle over this? Either NP is bussing or NP is legitimately suspicious of Gikkle - if going by only that then voting Gikkle would give the better chance of a Maf lynch?
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
Not a fan of stating this publicly as it defeats the purpose, but the reasons are:
1. If it is SvS, then either lynch is a success. If it is T+T then epic failure.
2. So my concern is if it is SvT and I want to see more voting action for us to deduce alignments D2 and later. Especially now that I see Wrath has parked their vote on Gikkle and seems to be checking out for the day. Your own commentary is inducing "all eyes on Gikkle" thing like your asking MM about 158, which I don't understand how "I haven't made any attempt at buddying with you" would be a scumslip? Gikkle was responding to me regarding my distaste of their "PQR is town" out of nowhere. And your offer of the option of "NP is legitimately suspicious of Gikkle" is also convenient, should you and NotPaopan happen to be scum.
-vote Not Maf Richtofen
/exist for 5 minutes
He knew you were rollin how is that possible!
(inside joke, nothing to see here)
@OzyWho I mildly townread ZZ for his shitpost because it shows high self-confidence, and I'm pretty sure ZZ would only show that spontaneously as town, because he's more comfortable as that alignment (and because he's newish to FM, which I assume is what Gikkle was talking about). The townread could very well decay if nothing better comes from him, though.
Have you heard of something called "lying"? :P
I saw you "defending" ZZ and placed a vote on you in an attempt to start a meaningful interaction. At this point, I'm pretty sure we're just chasing our own tails about that, though. There are better things to discuss lol. My "accusation" wasn't very serious, even though it had some basis.
Why don't you ask it Wrath? This post just looks shady to me tbh.
Like I said before already, that's not a mindset that Towns have imho.
It couldn't have been because "I haven't made any attempt at buddying with you." ? That's not a very convincing argument tbh.
Look, that's a slip in mindset. Town literally don't have a mindset wether or not they attempted to pocket someone. I be wrong and looking too much into it, but that's how I see it.
Ok, Gikkle responded to a comment about them. Is that supposed to be alignment indicative or something? Whatever makes you vote Gikkle I guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I can see how it might look like a chainsaw defense to you, but all I did was tell you that by your own given reasoning at that moment Gikkle should be the lynch not Paopan.
You disagreed with it because of the possibility it might be SvT. So let's continue on this thought process. Do you think Gikkle is Town? Why do you think it might be SvT, like why would a wolf!paopan act like that towards a town!gikkle?
I could see paopan being either alignment, but what makes you think it might be SvT?
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
In fact, that's why it's one of my favorite roles. A good actress is never comfortable until they use their ability. If we rolled one in this game, they're staying far away from anything sketchy.
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
What do you think that post was? I'm asking both Wrath and others at the same time.
PQR accused me of pocketing. So therefore I would HAVE to be aware of what pocketing is and why I didn't do it. You're saying I wouldn't be thinking about whether I attempted to pocket someone? That would be true in a vacuum, but the context is that PQR accused me of pocketing them. To defend myself, it would be impossible for me NOT to think about my actions in the context of pocketing.
Just as Ren has Auwt suspicions.
I'm sorry but I fail to see the difference between this post and the very post it's about.
My own thoughts on that Auwt post is that him drawing a conclusion there after such a minor observation would be weird imho.
That's not to say that it's alignment indicative, it's just that I don't really see why would someone except a conclusion in that post.
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
1. The original post was Ren saying you were saying something scum would say (which is an accusation). Auwt's post is shading/implying Renegade is suspicious without directly accusing them.
2. That's fair, but I disagree. If Auwt found it suspect, then they should say so. If not, then they should say that. However, the post is designed in a way to make Renegade seem bad without actually saying their own opinion or analysis on the matter, which is a way to avoid culpability/having to actually do analysis. It's not the strongest argument against Auwt, but it is suspicious for them to do in my opinion.
Idk, I might be reading too much into that "slip"..
@Frinckles
Do you have an idea where your vote will be at EoD? I'm not sure anymore whom I want to lynch.. :/
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
ok 7 hours to go
Spoiler : it will burn your eyes :
holy shit this list is gonna look bad post game. im still waking up
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
My spirit animal: https://youtu.be/fNugZU61EXI
I'm not sure, but probably not like this. If I had to guess, I'd say he'd be more careful, perhaps try to be likeable more than usual or something lol.
What? No, I didn't lie about Ginger, I'm saying they could have lied about not having read their rolecard. From reads point of view, at best it's anti-game, at worst it's scum trying to appear "neutral" (not in the alignment way, but rather in the behavior way).
How comes you have so many reads? There's basically nothing AI about 70 % of these people lol... I can understand Ginger in scum pool, but Gikkle? Hasn't he been scumhunting in an unimpressive, but still interesting manner? What about Wrath?
As for the townreads, ??????? WHY DO YOU THINK ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE TOWN XD
I think it's fair to request explainations lol.
either that or we have like 2 powerwolfs dabbing on us
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
Now I am going to pocket you and say this is perfectly legitimate lol - and that Ozy is pushing in a manner that is strange and bad at best and scummy at worst. Imagine you're accused of murder at place A at 3 PM, but you are innocent and were at place B at 3 PM. If you say "but I can't have killed anyone, I wasn't there!", the fact you're thinking about the need to be there to murder someone doesn't incriminate you, it's just needed to form a decent defensive argument...