If you compare the act of responding to a written/said text directly versus responding to the thought process that went behind it - what differences do you see? In terms of benefits and proper use.
Which do you prefer and when?
Do you agree that the latter is mostly only found in FM's?
I myself think that in any social interactions, the latter would tense up people while the former would give them a sigh of relief. But I believe people do the latter regardless?
You'd think that only the former is what you need to construct arguments in debates, yet I think on TV debates I see the latter often. Especially when lacking the knowledge for direct talk. Is that even a debate at that point?
I'm not sure if it's this topic related, but what 3rd option (if) causes this sort of misunderstanding?
Spoiler : Quotes :