39 - Opening post; encourages switcher to not act, tells BD to be cautious, expects at least one investigative town role and Butler-peeks me.
43 - fluff
46 - says switcher should work with town because town is more likely to win and third-party wincon is very unlikely
58 - is okay with my plan for switcher to act N1; wants switcher "mitigated" regardless; notes we could use switcher to eliminate a toxic player. Says he forgot LWs were a thing and that N0 peek reveals are standard on other sites
59 - says it's best if the Switcher reveals today so a scientist could verify them
66 - advocates not yeeting a switcher that works with town, and plans to get rid of whoever switcher switches to, regardless of when that happens.
85 - doesn't think it matters if switcher becomes triad, as they still have an incentive to yeet the switcher
91 - votes Martin for "voting [Renegade] while calling them TPR"
94 - asks Frinckles if he's the switcher, says he doesn't think Frinckles' statements come from a town perspective
95 - "Lol. The Mind meld is real~" (to me)
118 - Says he's not butler, and peeked me with a random number. Includes WIFOM that maybe he is butler
139 - asks if anyone else is getting scum pings from Frinckles
*151 - admits he doesn't yet know Frinckles' meta; says a previous post of Frinckles felt like triad team-signaling, (NOTE TO SELF: Check this post out; TriadHelz might not want to out legitimate signaling) and that many of Frinckles' posts come from a non-town perspective. Says he asked if Frinckles is Switcher because Frinckles was avoiding the subject of Switchers.
154 - "Alignment tells are not a thing in this game. Traid don't know their team mates." (in response to Renegade pointing out Martin's unvoting of Renegade happened after Frinckle's unvoting)
*219 - the ISO on Frinckles that accuses him of being Switcher; no vote
235 - says his focus right then was on Switcher over triad because of trouble of scumhunting through alignment changes
*236 - explains that SwitcherFrinckles could be signaling Triad because he doesn't know what team he'll be on tomorrow
240 - admits the ISO was poorly formatted and written quickly
259 - fluff
-----Day 2 Start-----
*752 - thinks D1 yeet was scum-driven, saw town perspective in Unknown, townreads yzb for "constant original points," especially post 418, (NOTE TO SELF: what post is that?) townreads me but didn't like my participation in the Oberon train, townread bakermir for expressing a lack of confidence in their reads and "pushing against chaos", townleans Martin based on his roleclaim and supposed uninformed perspective as evidenced by post 633, (NOTE TO SELF: what post is that?) mild town-lean on DM for "consistent" scumhunting that Helz disagrees with, doesn't know how to read Renegade, admits he overstated his "certainty" on Frinckles but still finds Frinckles suspicious for being on the Oberon train, scumlean on DW for pushing Oberon while possibly believing Oberon's claim, thinks Naz is inexperienced scum, believes in pressuring FrostByte for participation
753 - Says he really would have worked with a switcher who came out D1, but advocates D1's switcher to come out and reveal the new switcher.
754 - accuses FrostByte of being "semiconscious" about yeeting Oberon
755 - Self Conscious*
756 - Thinks DW is worth a second look; "big townie points for anyone who is willing to come forward and voice that they were switcher yesterday."
757 - asks DW for his read on me
762 - asks FB for his reads in response to FB's defense of his low participation
763 - votes FB for "pressure"
766 - tells FB he cares about content, not number of posts
768 - quotes Unknown's scumlean on FrostByte as a reason FB should contribute more
770 - "I promise I have read the entire thread at least 3 times."
774 - clarifies that he wants FB to form an analyzable opinion, not just shallow reads
*776 - Asks Naz for her thoughts now that she should have caught up, thinks naz is "on the radar with MattZed, Unknown and myself. I personally consider you a very viable D2 lynch as of days start."
*778 - says Naz would die N2 if Helz was a vig
782 - insists on getting an original thought out of FB
786 - literally links FB to Helz' scumhunting guide
790 - ends the FB pressure with "I do not understand why you made it such a massive issue to simply give thoughts on other players but it is what it is. "
792 - Makes very clear that what he wants out of FB with final word of "Please give me more of your thoughts on other players"
*849 - Asks Martin for who he bussed thinking that the DH was likely locked down
853 - says Frinckles checking DM is "not possible for a few reasons," and is interested to hear more from Frinckles/DM
1131 - doesn't think the DH targeted Frinckles because of how widely scumread he was (and thus a "viable mislynch") and how his claimed role is useful to triad, asks naz to clarify if they're detective or lookout, says our optimal play is to yeet DM or DW.
*1134 - doesn't see it as possible for Frinckles to be lying about seeing DM as Switcher UNLESS Frinckles was a DH who got blocked, although Helz doubts this setup wouldn't have a scientist
1139 - reinforces that Frinckles "is extremely likely town" and advocates sorting through DW and DM
1143 - speculates that DM was switcher and stole a triad role from DW
*1148 - thinks DW is the correct one to yeet first, and isn't sure risks of keeping switcher alive are worth it at this point
1152 - Thinks the only reason a DH would shoot Frinckles is to avoid crossfire, says DW and DM were both scummy before night actions incriminated them
*1157 - says Naz shouldn't be considered as a yeet until mid/late game because town naz would likely die soon
1159 - says the evidence points to DM being switcher, Frinckles being scientist, Naz being an investigating role, and a Locksmith exists. Thinks Martin being BD is also reasonable, and suspects that there aren't any crazy gambits going on
1164 - speculated a corrupted citizen got shot N1; doesn't think Frinckles was actually the N1 target
*1173 - again says scientist claim is a bad target because the role helps triad too, but concedes attacking a BD claim N1 makes sense because of talk of BDs doing nothing D1, or that a kill on someone widely townread makes the most sense
1176 - agrees with me (I think about Frinckles being scummy) but doesn't see how he could be fakeclaiming scientist
1183 - doubles down that shooting a BD makes sense because a BD isn't any more likely to swap themselves than anyone else
*1186 - says he was waiting for someone to mention the no-kill option, in response to Unknown bringing it up; says it would have been his play as DH to avoid crossfire and possibly frame someone (NOTE: in 1188, Frinckles claims to have mentioned it twice)
1191 - in response to 1188, says he's playing this game "loose" and asks how Frinckles feels about Renegade
*1198 - doubles down on 1186 saying that an escort claiming after a no-kill night outs a TPR and could drive TvTs
1264 - says he "called it" on DW claiming to be the new switcher and formerly triad
1270 - advocates yeeting the switcher today and then having the outed triad for tomorrow
*1279 - votes DW, advocating it as "towns best play" and not wanting to get swapped "to Triad"
1313 - says he believes DW's claim to being former triad; says DM could be a "vigi happy meal or our D3 lynch"
*1330 - thinks not ending D2 to hear opinions on DW would be a waste of time because Triad doesn't want to keep Switcher alive
1331 - advocates holding off massclaim for now because we can't use it to yeet yet; "just helps the Dragon Head pick his targets."
*1338 - in response to baker, doesn't see point in massclaiming as info isn't important until D4 unless we have a vig, and it's still bad if we do have a vig because of a living witch
*1354 - says we could have cits reveal as part of mechanical solving while not giving away TPRs, but also advocates for just scum hunting
1355 - reinforces that cit claims would force DH to kill cits or risk targeting his own team
*1357 - thinks I was potentially locksmith because DW claims to have witched me onto Martin (NOTE TO SELF: what post did Auwt clarify DW couldn't perform an action?)
1382 - fluff
1400 - fluff
1405 - asks what Renegade thinks DM will flip?
1418 - says he has the setup on in a separate tab and constantly goes to it when he has questions;
1450 - fluff
1451 - fluff
1452 - accuses Renegade of having "potential Triad priorities" for casting shade on DW's claim that DM is triad. Helz also thinks there's a greater "emotional tone" to the DM defense
1454 - asks Naz why she targeted DM N1
*1456 - posts role speculation, generally feeling good about small number of claims scum can make
1458 - Further comments on current claims being defensible
1460 - says his PoE is among Baker/FrostByte/Renegade
*1470 - again says there isn't harm in citizens claiming today
1471 - tells naz D2 start is post 710
1474 - says we know Martin or Frinckles were targeted N1, and thus Martin was likely locked down, which a moulder wouldn't want to do, so we should believe there's a locksmith
1479 - doesn't like naz voting Unknown; votes DW
1482 - is okay with a hammer now given "chat patterns yesterday"
*1501 - decided not to post thoughts on what a CA would do N1 "for reasons"
1504 - tells baker his PoE that includes baker is not in any particular order
*1506 - explains his PoE as being being about Baker/BF/Ren/Naz/Unknown/Yzb, but excluing Naz until lategame and excluding Unknown/yzb for being widely townread
*1514 - Gives same reasoning as in 1506 for his PoE, but adds that he claims Butler
*1519 - thinks there's a locksmith, not moulder, because I was supposedly witched onto Martin; he's surprised no one called him out for not thinking I was DH
1532 - says he revealed his role today because it was otherwise impossible to explain his strong townread on me
1534 - reiterates that I can't be triad unless Helz is aswell
1537 - states he's confused at bakermir's interpretation of Helz' mixed read on him
1541 - states again he revealed to help everyone with PoE
1547 - states his PoE is not at all based on individual reads of players
1550 - fluff
1551 - asks Martin if there's anything he'd like to add before EoD
1571 - fluff
1578 - affirms that he didn't put me on the top of his townlist because he wanted it to appear to come from a read; notes I called him out on it twice
-----Day 3 Start-----
1601 - In response to Unknown, reiterates that he's a Butler with me as his confirmed town, and that he was never switched
1607 - says today should be easy because "we have a scum in the bag already." says he's thinking if a massclaim is better today or tomorrow to help break through the PoE
1610 - after Unknown claims Helz is not Butler, Helz reinforces that he is hardclaiming butler
*1618 - tells Unknown he should reveal very soon if he's doing a gambit
*1662 - says he could see TriadUnknown claiming to get Helz yeeted to save DM. Asks why Unknown didn't reveal later, especially after a detective might have provided more incriminating evidence
1669 - thinks the TriadUnknown strategy in 1662 isn't actually that bad because it can set up a Helz yeet For D4 to put triad 3v3 in D5.
1681 - says he won't push Unknown today, but is focusing on what happens tomorrow; is still unsure why Unknown didn't wait for Naz
1690 - asks Frinckles for some "follow the Frinckles" after I already asked for some; says Helz can't do it himself with Unknown claiming
1720 - says TriadUnknown fakeclaiming Butler makes sense as a high-level scum play of setting a trap: building the case first before pushing
1732 - asks for Martin's thoughts on yzb/Unknown
*1751 - explains to Unknown that claiming early gives an out to triads giving fake investigative feedback, and that he personally would only do that as scum; says he considers it possible to have 2 butlers; says he's going to re-read Unknown's posts before asking questions
-----End of page 36, which is all the summary I have time/energy for---