If ever I switch my vote, that would be for Zedus. So, no Gyrlander for today (at least from me)
@Auwt if you lynch an afk MM i am going to check your ass tonight and you can be responsible for what happens
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
Host, give me one shot revolver please? I want to clean the game from trolls.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
So Frinckles+Mike used unreasonable vote on Gyrlander. One more point that they are the scum team.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Locked for host
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
The day has ended with marshmallow marshall being lynched! Standby for EoD post.
Lynch count:
Skip Day (2 [L-3]):
Gyrlander, Zedus
Gyrlander (2 [L-3]):
Mike, Frinckles
Dark Magician (1 [L-4]):
Marshmallow Marshall
Marshmallow Marshall (3 [L-2]):
Dark Magician, Auwt, MartinGG99
Last edited by Oberon; October 17th, 2020 at 05:28 PM.
(The lynch is plurality + majority, meaning that Marshmallow Marshall was actually lynched yesterday)
Resetting votes...
The monks accused Marshmallow Marshall of heresy, and tied him to a stake, preparing to burn him. As he lay strangled up on the wooden platform, one could see a large maniacal grin appearing on his face. His feet suddenly started changing into hooves, and as he lay there burning, he laughed most maniacally, damning the monks and cursing them most viciously. The Exorcist stepped forward and spoke a few words from the Bible, commanding the Demon to reveal his name. 'Baal', was the reply. His power broken, the demon fled his host and descended back into the depths of hell, taking his evil laughter with him.
Marshmallow Marshall was lynched, they were a Prince of Hell!
Player Role Status @MartinGG99 ?? Alive @Marshmallow MarshallPrince of Hell Lynched D1 @Zedus Spoiler : Role :Died D2 @Dark Magician ?? Alive @Gyrlander ?? Alive @Frinckles ?? Alive @FrostByte Spoiler : Role :Died D3 @Auwt ?? Alive @Mike ?? Alive
Day 2:
00
00
00
00
DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS
Link to setup: https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...ust-(7P-or-9P)
Day 1 - EoD: https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...l=1#post897026
Day 2 - EoD: https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...l=1#post897372
Day 3 - EoD https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...l=1#post897445
Day 4 - EoD
Day 5 - EoD
Last edited by Oberon; October 21st, 2020 at 05:48 PM.
BTW, not receiving feedback means 'no feedback'.
Anyway. Martin, Auwt, DM are clearer now.
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
@Mike has subbed out of the game.
Currently looking for a replacement.
Seems like we got scum on EoD1, despite Mike trying to do this:
Ah yes, the good ol' "Zedus is scum" approach that has only been true once out of all the games he played here, but was almost always tunneled d1.
I mean, seriously, could you not have had other bigger suspects? Or are you 100% sure that Zedus is scum here who was trying to push a skip vote while his (hypothetical) scum buddy was at 3 votes?
(Yes I know at the time, if town, you didn't know MM was scum)
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
I'm not gonna speculate on subbing out (or replacements), as some FM forums that I participate on don't do that.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Yes, no reason for scum to vote his ally d1. So Martin+Auwt+DM are probably towncore, and with one scum only looks like game is already town win.
Also, you are clearer now.
As I said, one of MM, you and Martin was scum. But more likely not 2 of you, because another scum is Mike. So it's not you
Well, Martin+Auwt+DM can just lynch others and win?
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Well we're in the good path. Now I'll be going to sleep.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
I think last Scum is either Grylander or Zedus.
But if the Host made Grylander scum they are game thrower because the deal is you make me scum instead of Grylander.
Sooooo-vote Zedus
oh shit i mean town
(๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶
What are the odds that the scum voted each other d1 in this size game and this setup? Does anyone have an example of this happening?
My knee jerk reaction is to be confident that they wouldn't but I'm not sure.
Again this non-explained trash.
Well, I don't realy care, town already won, because we have 3 known monks, lynched MM d1.
Troll ragequit, so he is most likely another scum.
Sacrifice one demon d1 to get town credit for another? It's possible, but I think, too low chance. Too risky.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
It's definitely possible, but would make the game way harder.
I don't have specific examples, but yeah.
On the one hand, I'm not 100% sure about Martin, but he joined the bus and never unvoted, town points, got to admit !
Dark Magician on the other hand, is almost town locked in my pov.
*Not 100% sure though, except if you know it cause you are scum ?
I will be honest, I'm just waiting for @Oberon to reset the vote count, and you are my primarly scum target, therefore I will vote you.
Mike would probably not leave in a scum team if his team mate is down, that's only speculation, but ye. So assuming he could be town, we have to take into consideration his reasoning.
Sure, but not unvoting is a risky deal for the second scum, especially in a small FM like this one.
So, first vote on MM can be scum? Well, it's possible.
One more unexplainable bonobo trash from... you? Really?
Why am I "primary" lol?
Is that some "meta" here to lynch everyone who explained strategy?
What's the logic in this shit?
To be honest, I don't realy care about being lynched, town already won, and I am 95% sure Mike ragequit because he is 2nd scum. But I just want to know what's wrong with such like you, who doing this irrational votes in every f*king game.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
At this point I've got you as 1st position, because of facts that Mike pointed out, and the fact you were on the skipping vote.
If somehow you aren't scum, then I would say it's Frinckles due to his late D1 reaction on the MM lynch asking to get another majority somewhere to tie the votes.
I don't like the word "meta" at all, sorry.
Regarding Mike's leaving, we shouldn't really debate on this, I guess that could be done postgame if needed, but I've got a small idea on the reasons.
"fact" Mike pointed out? What do you mean? I see no any facts in his troll shit. Can you quote that "fact" from that trash? Idk what do you meaning.
Yes. And I explained that. Scums have no tools to kill, and the only way they can win is by lynching. No lynch = no way to scums win. I explained that several times. I think you can read, ya?
Somehow... How many lessons of stupid unreasonable lynches you need to learn, that entire way you thinking just doesn't work. "He skip so he is scum"... Realy? What's wrong with you? What's the logic?
Just because he wants no d1 misslynch as me, maybe? You start every game with misslynch, but still staying on "we need lynch d1".
For what? There is some logic in d1 lynch then mafia can kill n1 and you will 100% have -1 town, so no-lynching is bad idea. But what's the point in lynching then scums can kill only one person with not very useful role? Can you try to think about it? Or "lynch d1 or scum" is your dogma?
Same as me, but this community like it, so I used it.
It's great for town, regardless of his alignment. His jester plays always anti-town, so removing him from the game is good even if he is town.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Well, I can agree with you that after I said for Frinckles "just vote skip with me for no misslynch", but he voted Gyrlander. That's the ONLY fact in your line of reasoning. Others are some dogmatic meta of d1 lynch, nothing else.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Also, using your own "logic", if I were scum, the first thing I shoud do at the end of day 1 is join Frinckles in his vote on Gyrlander to save my ally, not stay on skip. But your "logic" is not logic anyways.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Referring to the cyan colored explanation.
What I was talking about was the fact that there were 3 big groups of votes D1, the no-lynch squad (Gyrlander, Zedus), the anti-scum-proven-side (DM, Martin, I), and the Gyrlander-lynch squad (Mike, Frinckles). So my guess is that, both Gyrlander and you, tried to redirect votes to a skip, asking for a no lynch, and Frinckles did the same.
Mike followed Frinckles. With prior talking, I'm eliminating Mike from my scumlist rn.
Now I'm not saying lynching is good or bad, but players that could be wanting to redirect votes are still up, namely you and Frinckles (on different train still).
That's why I wouldn't be suprised if either of you turns out to be scum.
Getting a scum down so early on give us numerous amount of shots, we can miss them, or use them successfully.
Just an application of the previous reasoning I did, right above.
I don't want to enter that much in this lynch/no lynch debate. But in order to clarify my stance, there is no investigative roles in this setup.
Therefore, skipping would only give an extra shot for the scums to hit our Holy Priest and delay an inevitable Town death.
Would be the good time to do it, nah?
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Once more. There was NO REASON for scum not to vote Gyrlander to save MM from lynch. Well, if Gyrlander is 2nd scum, he cannot vote himself, ok. But if I were scum, after Frinckles says "join me and lynch Gyrlander" why should I not do that and stay on skip? What's wrong with you if you don't see that?
Wtf is "prior talking"? Mike is most scummy person. Trash talking whole game, said no useful things, calm down (probably after MM asked him in demon chat to shut up), then started his annoying trashtalking again. And quit after MM lynch. What's the logic of you removing him from scum list for that? Can you explain it? I can't understand how your brain works here, it's just a total nonsence.
AND MIKE
You said no any reason to remove him. That "Oh, no, I quit" shit can be just defence strategy, because after player replacement everyone at this forum become Dory fish from "Finding Nemo", and instantly forget everything about previous player did.
But you MUST be surprised. Because all your "logic" is totally wrong.
That's why I don't care about lynching me. Town is already won I think. But safest and easiest lynch here is Mike, and you have nothing versus reasoning to vote him I explained before.
The only thing I wait for is new player's name, just to vote the one who will replace Mike.
Scums have no shot. And exorcist role is useless. It gives no info for town at all. It's just one more monk, who can randomly protect someone from ability, which scums will never use until they kill him. This role is total nonsence. If he die, town will still have majority. And scums cannot kill someone else.
I agree with plan C.
Even if game is already over, I am still agree, why not?
Okey let's just check what happened prior to the lynch and make things clear.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
I don't think Zedus is scum here... like never.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
He didn't vote me and kept on skip and his reaction of "game is solved with 3 confirmed Towns" and him not being one of them sounds pretty towny.
I'm gonna have him as lock Town.
Thank you Anonymous Donor