ducky indirectly protected ds and auwt.
if this is not clear to anyone then i am ready to wait for their flip and prove everyone i am right. my vote stays there.
ducky indirectly protected ds and auwt.
if this is not clear to anyone then i am ready to wait for their flip and prove everyone i am right. my vote stays there.
I'm never on as you fuckers.
*at the same time as
@Auwt
I want you to come in and talk to me because I don't understand your progression on me in the slightest
I feel like no one even cares if I am town or not and I'm just being used as a pawn between a powerstruggling town and scum faction
It's lowkey awkward
This is bad. Or rather, this is weak. But is it scummy? Maybe not. Auwt just really, really needs to bring more to the table. Clearing Mesk for being wagoned in the circumstances she was wagoned in is not enough. @Auwt what are your reads on Banana, Renegade and myself? Try to say something that isn't related to "Mesk wagon sucks" please
Quaaaaack
Hi MM
I don't have hard evidence, that's also clearly not how I play. I don't play with evidence I play with real time interactions and gut reads based off that.
Once we have multiple day phases then I do vote analysis. That's how I play. If you want me to be the guy who gives evidence that is someone who I will never be regardless of my alignment.
Any scum can jump on any train, you could say the same about LuckyDucky's train (why is he scum again?), or about literally every other train. Scum can jump on trains. It's a fact.
I may not make friends by saying this lol, but I think Auwt is a misguided townie. He thinks very differently (and in my opinion, very wrongly too) from other players, but I think he actually believes what he says. This isn't a super strong read, but it's strong enough to make me talk about it.
Mm has three votes? Damn I was thinking governor this is a completely different role
You're also not even attempting to engage with any of my posts
@DS. sorry but "no u" won't work here
Like MM did you even read when AUWT put DS on L1..?
So like engage with me on what you think I am actually scum about then? Some random wall doesn't really do anything for me. Point out what it is you think I am doing that is scum and state it consistently. I'm here right now waiting for you to actually engage. Or can you not do that?
What I'm doing? People pushed me yesterday because I was "inactive" (never was btw) and now people are pushing me for (???) reasons and you have seemingly three votes on me and Auwt hopped on for (???) reasons with no progression like I pointed out earlier.
Everyone seems to think I am scum suddenly but no one has any legitimate reason to suspect me. Maybe because I'm seemingly a mislynch but I don't care because I will fight so that I won't be an easy one.
Also I just looked at your "case" against me and it's all that I don't have evidence on you and that my vote was naked. It's like you are upset that I caught you without having an actual reason for it and you're just trying to kill me off so I can stop trying to poke town in your direction.
-vote Marshmallow Marshall
*point town in your direction
Marshmallow can you tell me, other than me, who are your scum reads?
DS, you still didn't address this post at all, and you're trying to make me look like the one who doesn't give proper cases. I asked you why pushing inactives was a scummy thing in your eyes. You said nothing about it. You also didn't retract the accusation of "discounting your vote by saying it's naked" when it WAS naked. Instead, you said THIS:
When, as you so nicely said, you have no quackdamned case against me:
Actually I just did. There's no actual case there. You just said because I think you are scum that I am scum. It is a huge OMGUS
I think Naz, Banana, and Lucky are town
And by the way.
Can anyone seriously say that this is an honest thought process? Attacking me for supposedly "attacking his case but not proving him wrong" (which already makes little sense, btw, because how else would he want me to refute his accusations, with ad hominems?), and then saying "it's all vibes"? How am I suppose to prove vibes wrong, exactly? And more importantly, how can someone genuinely think that the person they are suspecting because of vibes should be able to refute those vibes??
Vote DS. We don't need scums like him in the Family.