-There was no chat prior to the game.
-There is no day chat.
-They can chat at night.
-They know thier names but not thier teammates roles.
there's no reason to assume the mafia would have a day chat
ah great. lovely
aight lemme check the setup for realz now
I don't know why either. I just pressumed "no n0 chat" means "d1 chat".
Are you shading me or are you actually curious if I'm in a Mafia chat? You read my opening post, so you know (or at least, should suspect) that I thought mafia have a D1 chat before the game started.
If I thought mafia have D1 chat before even the game started, why does that make me mafia?
I sincerely feel like you are shading me right now.
tbh if anything ozy not knowing if the mafia had a day chat or not wouldn't make him scum at all in this context
This isn't where i parked my car.....
or rather, ozy assuming they would have a day chat/n0 chat WOULD be towny or at least it would make him not-mafia
Spoiler : Ozy's huge thing :
Siiilent night....
Hoooolly shit..........
What are you doing, Ozy?! Lol.
This was very very probably a post created before start of day, and is somewhat NAI, I guess. The only actually telling part is that he puts the spotlight on him very very hard early on, so he gets 0.00000001 town points, I guess.
As for its content itself, I disagree that we should spam the thread with + 1 and - 1's. That's just saying "I like this." or "I do not like this.", which gives pretty much no info, and gives wiggle room to scum, since they can just say "I didn't like that guy, so I can't be scum with him!" or similar things. I'm not going to do it; however, I'll voice my opinion on the game's topics, just like I always do.
In case the question wasn't answered yet, the setup is plurality + majority (if no majority happens, plurality will happen at EoD).
And very funny....
Btw, why can Nass (or Voz, up to you) claim to not have read their rolecard on post 101, but that every time I say it (and it's always true), I get a thousand people jumping on me and get lynched D1?-vote Chip SkylarkUNFAIR!
I will just give a red check for trying to confuse everyone with that constant nonsense talk
Posting WAY too much Posting too little Extreme WIFOM Low effort posting Too careful/self aware IIoA (information instead of analysis) Sheeping too much MM Huey Solid Varcron Caustic OzyWho SB16 Korvoth Naz/Voss Blink YES Efe Mag Aamirus Yagami
You assumed there was a D1 chat which is a really weird thing to assume IMO (rarely do the mafia have day chats). I dunno, I find that extremely odd. You also disappeared until after Frinckles said there was no day chat and then reappeared to say "hey look I thought there was a day chat, I must be town". I do think it looks like you planned that......
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
MM I haven't even read how to use the internet yet but I havent gotten lynched
Sucks to be you I guess
Death, yet the Town.
~The Town Code
I like this table idea, btw. That's something nice. I also like that our thoughts align on Blink's post. I think that I'm going to do this for now:
-Jump in Ozy's pocket
also statistically speaking:
-stealth is a 3p
-mm is mafia
LYNCH MM
-vote Marshmallow Marshall
And he can actually help town a lot if he's not. I see your point, though, but for now I choose to trust him
Uhm, what? I think that your kind of opening is the most viable alternative to RVS, and even though it's rare to see it, I believe it can work.
um I don't think that such a table would help anyone but ok
I'm voting confirmed scum, I'm the town godfather, I know all the mafia in the game
sheep me
Sorry for being slow I guess?
Anyway, do you townlean or scumlean me now?
Put your vote where you mouth is.
I agree, that intent would be very wolfie.
However, just ~10-30 minutes ago you liked the intent of my opening post. Now you say the opposite.
What changed?
And you're mason assassin
Are you sure you can invoke meta here? Because I don't think you can :P he never pulled that kind of play as either alignment, and we haven't really played with him much recently. Plus, he said he was changing his playstyle and "playing nice" (which is good, btw! <3). I think that's a meta stretch here. And as you can see, my last games are making me rely less on meta... I got tricked on that French site too lol
I'm not talking meta here. I should've been clearer, I don't think scum would do that in general. It's just very very contrived, you can't magically manipulate people into believing your BS by marking down players in some table, nobody does that, because tables are not at all descriptive, they're just labels. extreme wifom doesn't actually mean anything for instance. its only important when put together (its the details that count).
You don't see how a systematized table of thoughts and reads with categories of reasons to explain the reads shortly would help anyone? Well uhm, I guess I'm a far seer then?
CHAIN LIGHTNING!!!
^^^^^^^^ An extremely skilled scum player could pull such a thing. That's why I choose to trust him for now.
-vote Aamirus
I said : "for now I choose to trust him". I think that's quite clear, no? This post doesn't feel like town aamirus, sorry. Jar Jar shall not eat more babies.
also
my role is actually 'fuck zeratul clause'
so I need to do this
why-a-white-flag-is-used-as-the-universal-symbol-of-surrender.jpg
I don't think so, no.
As in, what does table tell you that discussion couldn't? I'd rather have someone who has their own opinion than someone who just looked at a table and went "ya I agree with it".
Not gonna lie I don't think it's useful.
Gonna go get something to eat soon, should I have:
Entrecot
Lasagna?
Am I crazy, or did your view on Ozy's post change for no reason?
Also, to whoever was accusing me of "lurking" by viewing the thread without posting, that's just a plain lie lol, I arrived after more than an hour of the day had passed, was offline before that... so Screw You!