Dissecting Distorted's role if he is telling the truth:
Possibilities: (1) sheriff, (2) vig, (3) detective, (4) mason leader, (5) escort, (6) mason, (7) doctor, (
jailor, (9) bg, (10) architect, (11) crier.
There is no way he's a mason leader or mason. If so, he would aboslutely have followed MM's claim by either saying MM is lying or saying MM is telling the truth.
(1) sheriff, (2) vig, (3) detective, (4) escort, (5) doctor, (6) jailor, (7) bg, (
architect, (9) crier.
Crier didn't reveal, distorted knows how to play, he isn't crier.
(1) sheriff, (2) vig, (3) detective, (4) escort, (5) doctor, (6) jailor, (7) bg, (
architect
Nobody has claimed to be jailed, jailor would have claimed. Especially because this impacts whether we lynch or not.
(1) sheriff, (2) vig, (3) detective, (4) escort, (5) doctor, (6) bg, (7) architect
Nobody has claimed to have been given a private night chat. The "escort/consort" blocked MM which means that the action of giving this chat wouldn't be blocked and would have occurred. Because of this, I don't think he's claiming architect.
(1) sheriff, (2) vig, (3) detective, (4) escort, (5) doctor, (6) bg
Of these 6, we have 3 protective roles (escort, doctor, bg), 2 invest roles (sheriff, detective) and 1 killing role.
If Distorted wanted to help town, there's no reason that an invest role wouldn't reveal whether he got someone as not suspicious or not. That would be bad play to not reveal. Ozy revealed that Magoroth was not suspicious and it has been helpful to town.
(1) vig, (2) escort, (3) doctor, (4) bg
All of these roles make sense to keep them quit.
@
Distorted
I understand why you aren't revealing if you are soft-claiming one of these 4. Nevertheless, if you are escort and you targeted MM that would be really fucking helpful to know.
Because of this, and nobody other than MM has claimed to have been roleblocked, I think you are:
(1) vig (2) doctor (3) bg.
Did I do good?