Ok. Let's assume the following:
Marshmallow is a witch and trying to mislead the town into not lynching.
The problems with this thought pattern:
As it has already been explained by several others, it would be in the witches' advantage to cause a mislynch. Marshmallow Marshall is strongly opposed to the idea of a lynch on the first day, and has, in fact, urged us not to be voting people up. This however could be a witch trying to seem pro-town; if so he should very soon find a reason to cause us to lynch someone, either now or on the second day. Thus far, Marshmallow Marshall has been acting incredibly pro-town, so he is likely not a witch.
@
Marshmallow Marshall
, don't be saying stuff like ''I expect to die the first night.'' Scum could take advantage of that statement and frame you by keeping you alive. If there is a protective role in this game, I think you should either be defending Marshmallow or one of the he has not accused.
Noz_Bugz:
Player has been shitposting constantly.
If the player is a witch, then:
''Soviet Love will turn out to be a witch"
"Blink will flip arson''
''New players will carry town''
Is one of the new players a scum? And that second statement is extremely interesting. Why Arsonist and not Grand Master, for instance? And, what I find the most suspicious is your laid-back attitude.
@
Noz_Bugz
:
I am advocating voting this man up if blind voting is called.
IF he flips witch, then:
''Soviet Love will
somehow turn out to be a witch"
What is this statement? Are you trying to rescue him by framing him? Are you saying we should vote him up?
Notice how ''new players'' isn't a player, but, rather, a group of people?
They're the only ones you haven't named. Why is that?
You, sir, have my vote. Please, explain yourself.
-vote Noz_Bugz