But with Efe one cant even have a clue on his alignment so ill be RBing for sure on this one. Also Id like to say id there is a doctor in the game i'd like him to be on me(hopefully our doc is not a rule breaker) because you dont want to lose a rule follower due to a certain persons stupidity lol
If someone is a doc i would like a claim because theres something we can do to potentially draw out and either confirm a rule follower or a rule breaker
Anyway my vote will be on spruance thr same reason as i ve always been giving to you.
-vote spruance
Just my thoughts, not forced logic at all =)
If you are gonna say "it s not" here are the reasons:
A Part:why i believe mm is rule follower
1 he insta claimed mafia
2 he didnt jump onto free lynches or wifom scnerious
3 he s doing so much of slip able posts that i dont recognize to be one of those.
B part: why i m agreeing with mm:
1 i m not blink s trying to be seem as agressive and protective so much to himself without any arguements
2 blink s not playing like it s important him to die and trying to confirm himself with his death
3 blink s not making any real arguements that s useful to town except his self defence against insults
4 mm s improved himself since he first started playing this game
5 this idea s been supported by sb16 as well which s nearly confirmed innocent
U ve got the same thoughts still after providing that many reasons ? Blinky
1 claiming Mafia does nothing because this isn't that type of game 2 there hasn't been any lunches and I highly doubt there will be any lynches 3 all his posts just seem like fluff to me trying really hard to be something he's not nobody can be nearly confirmed innocent in this scenario we have no hints Clues or actions that can determine whether or not somebody is scum secondly what does my death actually prove when I flip follower because it doesn't prove mm is actually a rule breaker or a rule follower but if it takes me dying for him to get lynched or mod killed then so be it I volunteer as tribute lol
I can let 2 gtes win if i were to get my 2ndary win cond. It wouldnt make anyone lose either. Cuz in the setup it says no more than 2 rule breakers shall not win
You guys are retarded, there is absolutely 0 basis for saying I'm a skyper. I was afk day 1 and most of night 1, that shouldn't indicate anything. I've been pretty active since then and have tried to be helpful...
The thing I don't get/don't like about this set-up: in normal mafia, we have invest roles who can detect who the "bad guys" are. In this setup, this is no role that can detect. So we are trying to guess based only on people's behavior. But so what - there are 4 rule-breakers left and there are definitely not 4 people acting in the same way.
I claimed role immediately as soon as someone said "why not claim rule-follower? suspicious." Ugh makes no sense.
The only thing to do here is use probability and odds because just like in poker people's behavior doesn't mean a goddamn thing
For sure. The way this game goes is we have to kill, lynch, or modkill randomly until we know more people's roles. Then, once there are enough people dead who we know their roles, we would use hindsight to see how other people behaved towards them.
But really, other than the skypers, this strategy won't help at all. It is completely random. We have not roles that can detect primary objectives, and the only way people can gain a following here for a lynch train is to repeatedly accuse someone of something and be charismatic.
inb4 sb16 and MM are skypers.
i feel as rule follower, i shouldn't be voting because that is skyper win condition, right? to control votes?? sooo...if no one votes, skypers can't win, right?
Well, hopefully we can get them killed. There are only 4 rule-breakers left. I have a bad feeling hellbot is cuck since they've been online posting in another thread on the forum, but they could just be a shitty player lol. I don't think we should modkill or lynch, but have mafia kill again. Who though, I'm not sure, either Spruance or hellbot.
Everyone should probably also un vote before that vote gets to 50% on anyone
So it's safe to say we don't think that there's another game thrower am I wrong or right?
Oh my goodness, the logic used in this thread is astounding bad. Like outlier astoundingly bad.
Basically everything Soviet_Love is logically unsound. That, and the attitude taken after being pressured is whiny and defeatist. He(?) even side stepped the real question: why were you afk in the first place? Why did you post once and leave? Literally bandwagoned the reveal timing. I wish I could just quote mafia chat, but that doesn't seem morally sound.
blinkskaters newest agruments (along with sb16 and someone else) are also wrong. But I didn't get a malicious vibe from him.
WHY was he jailed in the first place? WHAT was that supposed to have accomplished?
Hybrid's logic is a no-no. I'll put it as misguided for now.
Sigh not enough time to address everything. I'll be mostly unavailable for the rest of the day.