OK can I pull the card "If I am Vanilla, lynch the insulting MrStoleYourGirl"? Is that a viable strategy in forum mafia games?
The only thing I actually believed was that piece about lynching a player with the holy grail. Sounds retarded, right? But for this save? Boy. sounds as solid as I am.
That's not how it works in most cases. You could, however, type up reads on the people in this game. Make them good and put in valuable insight. This might be useful later on in the game. Above all it's a step to help your town team win. If you're actually town.
Which you're not.
-vote Reemus
Meh, this day has gone to shit.
Fury out.
Look behind you, It's me fuckin' your Gurl.
Provide me a simple example your 14 pages of "sounds ****my* exchanging gave you a single useful piece of info. If your logic stands correct, I will try to do something to actually not, because I already told you everything I know, both my role and my suspicions.
I feel like Reemus is just a policy lynch and tbh I don't think we've reached that point yet.
Don't forget I still have the needle up my sleeve so no on can lynch without my approval.
PROs seem to be unable to read, since I have already made my input against the I guess I will just say it again for someone proper to remember it tomorrow:
Blue name Snoop Dog profile-picture player is not a town "vanilla" friendly. Neither is drawn-girl profile-picture player. So step it up, tastes.
Also, Marshmallow, I do not doubt you are a pro-town, since you did claim "vanilla" first, which means you are either in cahoots with the hosts OR did receive that role in your card. I will not even blame you for jumping on the lynch train, powerless people usually want to appear to be "in control", even if they are actually not. But I am "town". And you will regret it, if you are a proper player.
Calling me "toxic" with that picture profile is darn mighty disrespectful. I'd rather go a hero before becoming a your faction alignment.
There's a lot of people viewing not a lot posting...
Reemus lynch is:
a) a scum lynch
b) a policy lynch
In both cases, we are good.
You know that most people in this game only claimed vanilla because after Marshmallow you decided it was a good idea to also claim? And that it's better for everyone to claim that instead of whatever other role they might actually be? So if you used your brain you might have figured out already that I may or may not be "vanilla".
The problem here is that you are complaining about people instead of offering up legitimate reads on people. Why are you whining about not having any information on D1 when it is all right there, in this thread? It shows a complete unwillingess to contribute to the day hidden behind the excuse of not being able to contribute. And while the excuse might not even be a lie, I believe it stems from the fact that you are unable to form proper reads because you are scum. It's a typical scum tell. They can't offer up reasonable reads or some go as far as pointing at all the low-hanging fruits to deflect. In your case it's specifically your apparent activity coupled with your rejection to contribute in a helpful manner. My vote is staying for now.
Reemus, why do you consider Fury (mrstoleyourgirl) and NoctiZ scum? If you just say that "they are not town" without any reasoning your suspicions are worthless...
Thank you Anonymous Donor
That you don't have reads is pretty bad to be fair. Because it also leads others to believe you to be scum. Since you can't really contribute if you don't have any reads. And many people, of which I am one, have already claimed to believe you to be scum. Your insistence on not being scum, despite (or especially because of) you saying it a lot of times already, does not make others believe you to not be scum.
You should step it up, be that through gut reads or actually pointing out scum slips or suspicious statements in other people's posts.
@Reemus
If you wish, I can direct you to some guides/ thought papers? That can show you how to scum hunt only using game post without night actions, and also links to why D1 is important.
Nah, you can legitimately point out suspicious behaviour in experienced players. RLVG is experienced for one but his day behaviour has been absolute shite. I've also seen a thing or two with players like SuperJack or Gyrlander. But you have to realize that newer or "less try hard players" (which is a pretty stupid term, if you don't want to try then play the mod or something) tend to make more mistakes. Those mistakes might be legitimately due to inexperience or they are scum slipping. And it's hard to differentiate. But today the currently most suspicious people are good choices.
Give it a day or two and I'll guarantee you that we'll see "experienced" players on the chopping block.
Oh and also, what does the roles being randomized have to do with anything? Everyone knows their role since the start of this day. They have been acting with this knowledge in mind. This directly influences the things they say and the way they say it. Open your eyes and you'll see.