S-FM 209: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

[Shapelog]

>says he wants to start the game off
>makes no attempt aside from saying "let's go" to actually get things going

Strong.

>Complains about not wanting to do anything
>Expects me not to do anything to follow that up
>Does something to follow it up
>????
>Profit

[Calix]

>Complains about not wanting to do anything
>Expects me not to do anything to follow that up
>Does something to follow it up
>????
>Profit

Responding to my post with trolling. Noted.

Moving on. Which site do you herald from and what's the standard 'meta' over there?

[Shapelog]

Responding to my post with trolling. Noted.

Moving on. Which site do you herald from and what's the standard 'meta' over there?

Will see where that gets you.

I am from Team liquids mafia subforum. I've played like over 15 or so games there, and currently in 1 like i said. If our database wasn't screw-up, I would say you could my personal meta quite easily.

As a site, TL usually spends D1 joking for the first half, looking for tone/meta/questionable posts, and then goes into more heavy discussion later on. Its pretty active compare to other sites (usually in a decent game now a days, 40 pages per cycle) and a good chuck of people are narcissist or funny. Minus a few are try hards.

Later in the day it changes with how the games go. I will say the site as a whole focuses a bit heavy on associative reads (I personally might breezily talked about 1 thought, but I typically wait till after a scum lynch.) and not enough of filter diving over all. VCA differs from person to person, case building is pretty good when looking at those players who been there more then 5 games.

Jealous also comes from TL as well.

[Calix]

Will see where that gets you.

I am from Team liquids mafia subforum. I've played like over 15 or so games there, and currently in 1 like i said. If our database wasn't screw-up, I would say you could my personal meta quite easily.

As a site, TL usually spends D1 joking for the first half, looking for tone/meta/questionable posts, and then goes into more heavy discussion later on. Its pretty active compare to other sites (usually in a decent game now a days, 40 pages per cycle) and a good chuck of people are narcissist or funny. Minus a few are try hards.

Heads up, our ISO feature is a bit awkward to use, but we have an automated vote counter which is just at the top of the thread.

How D1 goes varies a bit on this site. Sometimes you get a lot of trolling/ shit-posting to start, but usually we have RVS/ setup spec/ meta/ odd posts for the start.

Not sure how this game will go at all, given that we have a lot of off-site players put together with some mod players and casuals. It's why I want to clear up any possible meta clashes sooner rather than later.

Later in the day it changes with how the games go. I will say the site as a whole focuses a bit heavy on associative reads (I personally might breezily talked about 1 thought, but I typically wait till after a scum lynch.) and not enough of filter diving over all. VCA differs from person to person, case building is pretty good when looking at those players who been there more then 5 games.

Jealous also comes from TL as well.

If you're referring to pre-flips, then I'm personally not a fan of those unless I'm looking at independent scum-reads.

I'll keep the rest in mind.