v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~
Mafia's win condition is to gain majority among any one of the groups.
One of the groups has 2 scum. The other two groups has 1 scum.
GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3Titus
Shapelog
MattZed
Klingoncelt
Alles_PalettiCalix
JealousTL
Slayer
PLZLEAVEDUCKK
SprunceGingerape
RLVG
Kovath
Yukitaka Oni
Never Unlucky
So no, we cannot determine how many mislynches we have afforded to us. I am going to act as if we don't have any.
I'm only paging this because I suspect that the no-posters will also have queries over the setup and using the first 24 hours to ensure that people know what they're doing seems like the best move to me.
Anyhow, I'll be popping off for a bit. I expect SOMETHING to happen by the time I get back. Can't prod you all forever.
No wonder why this setup have a lot of town power....
v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~
Did your first comment indicate you dislike the idea of read list or more that it is funny the person who does not know their alignment is trying to tell people their reads.
Read lists are just a staple of my play as every alignment. It
1) gives me a way to not get complacent on my reads and makes me remind myself of why I read people x
2) I am able to show a consistent (or be called out for inconsistent) game.
I am a bit worried that you are accepting my claim as true based on this post. You state that the game has just been US 4 prancing around. I don't need perfect information to give out accurate reads at this point in the game because I have been apart of everything, and as I am sure you know, I interject into fucking everything.
Then there is the whole "i don't think the scum have been manipulating us". I agree with this 100% if you are town, but if you are mafia this game it falls in line with what I would expect.
To clarify, if you just said "duck I think you could actually be telling the truth based on your reads list" I would expect it was because of my kovath read and not that my reads are feasible at this point in the game. You laugh at the main thing pointing to me being the real duck which I am sad about.
My dog keeps fucking up my train of thought, I don't even know where I was going or if I had a point in this entire post.
Calix, I am on board with frying Yuki as well. It's a joke in RVS screams lynch them from my own personal experience. I'd prefer group 2 but that desire is waning since I can only get Yuki there.
Basically, I am ok with Yuki or ginger flipping.
In a normal game I would lynch ginger, but with the potential to have 0 miss lynches, are you more confident that they are mafia or that they could be mafia and will give a lot of information from their flip?
Yuki is more of a day 2 player from my one game experience, but I am willing to entertain this lynch.
My lynch order from group 3(1 being want dead the most)
1)rlvg
2)kovath
3)yuki
4)Ginger
5)NU
I think my list might be a huge mistake though. RLVG is top just because of lack of activity, and the next three players in line all have reasonable spots to be pinged out for as scum. I think kovath being able to speak more, hes in the thread, and NU posting will help clear this up.
Hmm actually rlvg might just be a terrible lynch at this point.... fuck me.
Your one-game experience with Yuki was IM, wasn't it? How can you judge "day 2 player" off that?
What made you change your mind about RLVG?
Also, Calix is correct and I am currently out-of-town in a tournament. I will try my best but nowhere close to my normal activity levels. I'll be present for several-hour intervals around days.
Death, yet the Town.
~The Town Code
Oh whoops, yeah that was an error by me. I was thinking about how he stepped up his game in the second half of the day and mistook it for a day 2, smh.
I changed my mind about rlvg because while I do not feel any of you, yuki, or ginger have enough mafia credit to be lynched currently, I see enough potential for mafia in you three where the odds are at least one of you is probably a hit, and rlvg is prob inno child. Well not inno child, but not a good lynch for day 1,
We know that there is one mafia in every group. I started the game wanting to lynch him based on his recent activity. The game progressed, and three people in his group have been viewed as somewhat scummy. It is likely that one of the scummy people is actual scum. This means he is likely town. Upon rethinking as I was typing I realized, well he could still be in the group with 2 mafia, so maybe he is not town, but to lynch him under the assumption that he is in the 2 mafia group and over scummier players would be bad.
The setup has nothing at all about a scum N0 chat (unless it's a hidden mechanic in which case... fk me lol). So, this exchange strikes me as strange because Duck first suggests N0 coordination as what would probably be the case if he was mafia and had pre-planned this. Assuming that Duck has fully read through the setup, why wouldn't Duck immediately rule out that possibility for him as mafia in either his original post or after Calix brought it up? Or at least make some comment about it to reinforce his point that he wasn't lying in his claim?
Drunk Duck might be the explanation for this, however, and I don't think he was lying about being drunk lol. The primary no-lynch perspective otherwise I might see for this would be that he is approaching this game as town and thus brushes past it because then he would 'know' that he was town, but I am unsure whether he is able to so strongly believe it. All that said, there will probably be better lynches than Duck today.
Death, yet the Town.
~The Town Code
I don't know who Shapelog and Alles_Paletti is, but wow, MattZed and Titus in the same group? And Klingoncelt too?
I'm not voting Group 1, just hope that the three of them are not scum lol.
-vote Group 2
I don't think we're ready to guess scum among MattZed, Titus and Klingoncelt.
It requires to vote a player with the following existing name for it to work, so we can easily vote for banned players or admins that's not part of the game.
Assuming it has been fixed though in some way, but a headsup on how it originally works.
Sometimes I'm the most active player, believe it or not. Are you sure it's just nothing personal against me?
If that's the case, I'd like to have personal feelings to a minimum and more of the Mafia element instead.
Also this is scummy as fuck, "I think lynching him would be good for town REGARDLESS OF FLIP".
Are you attempting to set up a False Dilemma Titus and Calix?
1. I don't only troll comment, I sometimes mix it with the serious though. Look on ThePaladin's & RLVG's Chess Game on that FM game, we were discussing seriously while playing Chess on the FM lol.
2. I went MIA because my computer commited suicide and I had to repair. Was replaced out due to no replying to the Host, I told them what happened and asked if there's a chance to replace in again on that same slot if something happened.
3. I'm a god damn European! I'm not going to be deep active with particular players.
I consider it a logical fallacy of some kind to assume that "the only people in this game who knows my alignment is the Mafia", some players might get a clear read based on what you're doing and how you're doing regardless of their own alignment. Also Town are prone to having both a clear scum and town read.
Thanks! It's extremely infuriating to look at lol.
I keep quoting you because you say weird shit like this lol.
That totally werren't an appropriate sentence, just sayin'.
What the fuck am I reading?
So let's unfuck it a bit, you're claiming to be Setup Power of some kind? Some kind of guy that can manipulate the setup?
And you think you're the only one with this Setup Power?
Which makes it more significant of that if anyone knew your alignment, they're scum?
That's a good personality, except I don't see enough questions for this claim.
Only way for you to not be sure of your alignment is if you have the role name of roles that's of two factions and you didn't ask the Host what it belongs to.
They are : Rolestopper, Voyeur, Follower, Motion Detector, Neopolitian.
I doubt you'd slip on something so critical though as to reveal you're a TPR of some kind.
Then I will use this color to make people passively think of my alignment.
Until a random Town decides to vote a Town because they think they're scum. Anyone can vote anyone except themselves.
AMNESIAC?!
Freudian slip or are you making a stupid slip of trying to gambit a role that's not in the game?
Night actions could lead to Scum being killed or preventing a kill, so even if we mislynch it doesn't necessarily mean we lose based on odds and lynching power.
Exactly, we confirm players this way. The question is though, is a hidden mechanic going to give the Traitor a free pass if there's one?
Dude, I were asleep. Stop trying to purposely paint me as scummy based on my absense. You don't even get a proper read of me if I don't even give you any material that you can cherrypick on.
True, there can't be a town lean and it's impossible, because by default this whole game you're scummy lol.
+1 points to Duck for being correct. I don't townlean him.
MattZed is the most definitive mod player, so are you saying you could be in a team specifically with Zed and Spruance?
Stop painting yourself as scummy.
Yeah, we're totally illuminati pals together, together with Sen(pai).
Considered though, an odd statement coming from you. Is it a subtle guess on teams?
Since no one can understand this... PICTURE
So your read on him sucks but you don't want to lynch him because he is likely Mafia.
Okay!
I don't think I ever have seen you want to lynch based on personal experience.
So I'm on the top spite having not posted anything at all.
Werren't I a Town role when I was replaced out due to computer suiciding?
I really feel it's more personal.
Then there's Kovath who you don't want to lynch based on a shitty read, but I'm the more shitty read.![]()
Catching up.
Reminds me of Calix.
This leads me to a concern. If he himself doesn't know his alignment, do the scum know his alignment (by POE or by seeing his name in the groupscum chat)? If not, that makes it a very good WIFOM play on his part. If his alignment is town, then he is discouraging the scum to push for him as he may be one of theirs.The main advantages fake-claiming No-Alignment has as scum is to take yourself off the table for the lynch. However, mafia in that position would want their group voted so that the chances of a ML are higher. Also you could have drawn less attention to yourself by simply voting for a different group and thus save yourself that way.
About this setup spec discussion between Duck and JTL -- assuming this is 2-1-1, it makes up for a good NKA. Scum are most likely to kill a player from the group they have 2 members in as they just need to eliminate 2 players from this group rather than 4. Let's keep that in mind.
Naturally, yes.
Jealous’s tone gives me a town feel so far. Early T-R on Jealous.
Oh I glossed over that line. Like I have told you many times, I do not plan or edit my posts ever.
-Calix questions my negative utility claim
-I think to myself what the fuck does this accomplish as town and mafia.
-Town has no reason to do it from what I see
-Mafia has no reason to do it by themselves as it just makes them stand out and puts a target on their back. This is where I got the idea that it has to be coordinated. I know there is no night 0 chat, but in trying to entertain a world from your guys perspective that is the way I went in my thinking.
-If anything this should show you that I am in fact no alignment because if I am mafia pulling a play, I clearly did not think it through. I guess you could think I was playing dumb and doing one of those "GUYS i THOUGHT THERE WERE ONLY 2 MAFIA, I CANT BE MAFIA", but I think you know me well enough to know that is not really my style.
I really do not think I am even making sense at this point
Duck, answer me this.
I am a town role who received sufficient coloring, as in I'm a Town Role who's part of the Alignment.
Of course this means I will play out my own win condition over the fact I am a Town.
Where does this bring you? Did you seriously not get the same treatment?
What win condition are you aiming for, considering going for the opposite win condition is against the rules of the game?
MRW multiple players quote my long, full post.
You're flooding the page this way, boiz.
That's contradictory to what I got and I see nothing on the setup that whos this as a possibility.
Maybe I know a hidden mechanic myself, but it certainly ain't this.
Not to mention that the host explicitly put a rule to play out your win condition, not knowing yours just makes the rule invalid.
You're supposed to know your win condition.
YOU ARE TO PLAY TO YOUR WIN CONDITION. IF I THINK YOU ARE NOT AND I WARN YOU AND YOU DO IT ANYWAYS, I WILL EXPLAIN IN DETAIL TO THE MODS WHAT YOU HAVE DONE AND YOU WILL BE SUBJECTED TO PUNISHMENT IF THE MODS AGREE WITH ME
Well you are going to have to accept that I do not have an alignment until the end of night 1, or try to get the town to lynch me. We can talk post game whether or not "forgetting" my alignment invalidates a rule. If you do not believe me, and read me mafia then you should be able to easily construct a case against me of why I am mafia. I will love watching you try to find something in my play that indicates I am mafia when I can't possibly know if I am.
Making yourself a low-hanging fruit while negetating reads by stating you don't know your alignment is a way to avoid a lynch prematurely, which itself is a scummy move, only possible as the setup says that there's a hidden setup.
Unfortunately, I may have caught you in a string of gambits that contradict the setup, if you don't know your own alignment Day 1 when there's a possibility of dying by Lynch during Day 1, you can essentially go against your own win condition and you don't even know it. The setup promotes that everyone should know their own alignment by rolecard or otherwise the general win condition so they don't contradict a rule on the setup.
Because this claim is unbelieveable, I may have to request you to share what you received from the host (don't quote it).
You overestimate their ability to play the exact same way as all alignments. I'm also not in the business of giving Day 1 passes to 'experienced' players.
It's been a while since I've played with you so I forget the finer details of your meta, exactly. However I wasn't a fan of this post. You get way too touchy over Duck's comments about wanting to policy-lynch you. (which he can't follow through on his own, thus meaning that you look like you're overreacting to the suggestion)
You're also misjudging his posts a lot.
Spoiler : Case in point :
Night actions could lead to Scum being killed or preventing a kill, so even if we mislynch it doesn't necessarily mean we lose based on odds and lynching power.This is out of order but I also fucking hate these posts. You are low-key trying to justify town fucking up in advance. There is literally no town motivation to trying to make town MORE complacent in this setup when we have hidden mechanics and the potential to lose N1.Exactly, we confirm players this way. The question is though, is a hidden mechanic going to give the Traitor a free pass if there's one?
Second post just reeks of someone trying to keep his options open in the case that townies DO get confirmed.
.... I can't tell if you are trolling or not at this point. If you do not go back and reread my first post (you quoted part of it, it is on page 2) then I can't discuss anything with you. I have literally already done this.
Why would I make myself low hanging fruit to avoid lynch? I have never been miss lynched, and with my group, I would ALWAYS be able to out talk a lynch over the other group members. Literally every comment you made on your long iso about me is a misrep or false. Do I really have to get out of bed and put effort into this right now zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I have a friend visiting me and I'll be going to cinema soon, so I won't be around.
Back later!
Calling out a shitty post =/= a defense of you. It was an attack on RLVG's shitty post and would have been done regardless of who he was talking to. Of course he disappears the moment I get on the thread
I don't buy his logic about the win conditions. Players cannot attempt to game-throw if they do not know what their win condition is.
The fact that RLVG/ Yuki (two suspicious players in Group 3) are both voting for Group 2 for spurious reasons makes me skeptical of the odds of lynching correctly if Group 2 is chosen.
Playing in a ‘marathon’ game and a 15 player game at the same time is a bad idea. zzz
You'd prefer lynching from the easier to sort players than from the easier to read?
I, too, think he's honest. In that sense, I wouldn't support lynching today to flip the coin and would rather wait until Day 2 to see how his play style change with an alignment's win-con in mind. Throws shade while keeping a town tone.
His reasoning and cautiousness is another thing I like about him. They seem town-motivated for me.
Considering removing my vote from my group in that regard.
Not liking GingerApe so far. The dude states the obvious and sheeps Calix’s and Jealous’s thoughts.
[SPOILER] [/SPOILER]
Feels like a person who’s IIOA. Null-read.
What makes you view Gingerape's post as constructive?
Seconded
This read progression confuses me. You claim he's throwing shade (although in a 'townie' way), then criticise him for sheeping/ stating the obvious...then you claim he uses IIOA (typically a scum tell)...and you concluded null...?Throws shade while keeping a town tone.
Not liking GingerApe so far. The dude states the obvious and sheeps Calix’s and Jealous’s thoughts.
Feels like a person who’s IIOA. Null-read.
Yeah I was finally about to pass out, and then I read that contrived bullshit, and he just bounces without discussing it.... Quick literally specifically asked me about the gamethrowing rule in the signup thread, and this guy comes in here and says I have to be playing against my win condition because I do not know my own role? I think the host is aware of his fucking mechanics and made sure they would not breach his own rules....
Why are you skeptical about our odds in group 2 though? If I am in your POV and know I(calix) am town, then the only way our odds would be bad is IF the read on TL is wrong, and he is in fact mafia. RLVG would be pushing me so if he is mafia, we will assume I am town, you know you are town, I believe TL is town, and that would leave us with a 50/50.
v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~
If Calix and I are both town, do you think we would have posted any less if we were mafia? This setup does not have the room for error to allow a lynch on someone who is lurking. I realize that I am partially advocating a group 2 lynch while criticizing you for it, but it seems you purely only want to lynch within lurkers, and not because of any town read on the other players.
Almost up-to-date.
1) Lynching someone simply for being inactive when Quick has at least 2 replacements at his disposal is your #1? Why is he your top target?
If you want to lynch people based on their inactivity, why not vote for Group 2 [Spruance and or Slayer] or Group 1 [MZ, Alles_Palleti, Klingofthecelts]?
2) I know that you've said that you can 180 people you previously town-read, but I don't understand why Kovath is your #2 when you clearly stated that you weren't lynching him today because your D2 reads on him were better. He didn't post since you made your reads list either. Care to explain why he's #2?
He's also sitting in a similar spot as RLVG as he's only posted once. Why is RLVG more important of a lynch to you?
3 and 4) Other than Gingerape's town tone, I haven't noticed anything AI in their posts. I wouldn't (Vocally) support their lynch today.
I actually am considering Group 2 to be a better group to lynch from since I town-read Jealous, leantown Calix and have faith in DUCK's claim. It basically leaves me with two policy lynch options. (In contrast, my group has 2 PL targets and 3 players who aren't strongly read by anyone.)
Why is that?
!
........it's me or....my group....is suspicious.....the most....?
v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~
Hm.....maybe not
I don't mean this is a negative way although it is going to come across so. Are my posts not making sense? I feel like multiple people have asked questions that the very post they are quoting answers. It is entirely likely and probable that I am too out of it and am not being very crisp in my wording, so if so my bad. I do not care if people need to repeat myself, but I want to know if I am hallucinating or others just overlooked something.
Anywhoooooooo back to your questions
1) I dont plan or edit posts. I type as I think and unless its a typo I dont really backspace. I was thinking about my lynch order for that group and when I started I wanted to lynch rlvg ( purely off a now proven false assumption that he would not be posting). As I thought about each player in the group, i reevaluated and realized that there are a lot of scummy people in group 3, and if there are several scummy people, I should NOT be policy lynching RLVG.
Keep in mind I have also been advocating the whole time about the merits of voting group 2. You post the same conclusion about a potential 50/50 in slayer/spruance (although it might turn out not to be this simple).
2)Okay so this is one of those things where I am a special snowflake and I have my own duck way of doing things. I scum read Kovath, but my day 1 reads are wrong on him. This means he very likely could be town. I think his play is scummy, but I am more confident in my ability to accurately read him on day 2 that I think there are better lynches on people I am better able to read on day 1. He is #2 because his question and bounce style reminded me of his play in IC and several other games. He tends to ask more hollow and less thought provoking questions as non town roles. He is at a tournament so I don't want to make an error in reading him as others have in previous games from him not being able to respond.
In short I think he is and could be scum, but my day 1 reads on him are notoriously bad, and he has been out of town. Like you said he has a similar post count to rlvg. The difference for me is I thought rlvg had a recent history of no showing, but he had computer issues I did not know about. I mentioned others knew better and should chime in, I guess nobody really felt like clarifying for me.
3) I probably agree with you here? I think their next several posts will shift them from the middle for me. Probably a great lynch for information, bad lynch to risk a MYLO.
4) I mentioned this several times, and it is starting to feel like one of those too good to be true type scenarios. Calix never buddies me this hard, the other guy is either town or a really strong day 1 mafia play, who the fuck knows what I am, and we have two MIA. If B turns out to be a double mafia group, we could potentially just hit runner runner...
I don't know what to think. Every fucking word is a blur, nobody even mentions group 1, like what the fuck do we do with that group.
:/
Sheeping and stating the obvious = NAI.This read progression confuses me. You claim he's throwing shade (although in a 'townie' way), then criticise him for sheeping/ stating the obvious...then you claim he uses IIOA (typically a scum tell)...and you concluded null...?
He's thrown shade on Duck by mentioning the possibility of him being the traitor (which is a possibility), but he didn't push the idea and he kept his tone. It's the opposite of what Eggy and MattZed did in IC to you: they mentioned the possibility of you being scum and killing Mesk who was defending you for town cred and pushed the idea to discredit you. Ginger isn't doing this.
Yes, IIOA is a scum-tell just like town tone is a town-tell. I don't feel like any of these points are over-shadowing the other atm (especially after mislynching SP in BN who showed many scum-tells while still having a town tone), so I conclude null.
It's not that your posts don't make sense, it's more that you contradict yourself (sometimes in the same post, lol) and flip-flop your opinions quickly. This is something my 'good buddy' Eggy does a lot as scum, so I am intrigued to know what goes through your head when you make said posts. It seems to be NAI for you though, so I'll just have to get used to it.
What would your Group 3 lynch priority be atm then?Anywhoooooooo back to your questions
1) I dont plan or edit posts. I type as I think and unless its a typo I dont really backspace. I was thinking about my lynch order for that group and when I started I wanted to lynch rlvg ( purely off a now proven false assumption that he would not be posting). As I thought about each player in the group, i reevaluated and realized that there are a lot of scummy people in group 3, and if there are several scummy people, I should NOT be policy lynching RLVG.
Keep in mind I have also been advocating the whole time about the merits of voting group 2. You post the same conclusion about a potential 50/50 in slayer/spruance (although it might turn out not to be this simple).
2)Okay so this is one of those things where I am a special snowflake and I have my own duck way of doing things. I scum read Kovath, but my day 1 reads are wrong on him. This means he very likely could be town. I think his play is scummy, but I am more confident in my ability to accurately read him on day 2 that I think there are better lynches on people I am better able to read on day 1. He is #2 because his question and bounce style reminded me of his play in IC and several other games. He tends to ask more hollow and less thought provoking questions as non town roles. He is at a tournament so I don't want to make an error in reading him as others have in previous games from him not being able to respond.
In short I think he is and could be scum, but my day 1 reads on him are notoriously bad, and he has been out of town. Like you said he has a similar post count to rlvg. The difference for me is I thought rlvg had a recent history of no showing, but he had computer issues I did not know about. I mentioned others knew better and should chime in, I guess nobody really felt like clarifying for me."A great lynch for information" -- How?3) I probably agree with you here? I think their next several posts will shift them from the middle for me. Probably a great lynch for information, bad lynch to risk a MYLO.
Neither Yuki nor Gingerape has had any serious interaction with anyone, so I don't see what information their flip would give. The only information they'd give is that Kovath, RLVG, [The one of them who hasn't been lynched], and I mechanically have more chance of flipping scum.
From an outside Calix - Duck interaction POV, I did not feel like she was buddying you. What makes you feel that way?4) I mentioned this several times, and it is starting to feel like one of those too good to be true type scenarios. Calix never buddies me this hard, the other guy is either town or a really strong day 1 mafia play, who the fuck knows what I am, and we have two MIA. If B turns out to be a double mafia group, we could potentially just hit runner runner...
I think Jealous is a town. Fuck his typing style though.
Because there's nothing to be said about group 1. 3 inactive players asking to be PLed, Titus (null for me), and Shapelog being the scummiest with his "Oh, I didn't know there was X mafia" comment doesn't propose an educated lynch.I don't know what to think. Every fucking word is a blur, nobody even mentions group 1, like what the fuck do we do with that group.
Why is the idea of a policy lynch option being entertained?
Your logic is flawed. Scummy doesn't necessitate them being scum, so the switch to "RLVG is likely town" (or like an Innocent Child or something like that - it was in a different post so going off memory here) does not make sense.
I also don't see why you'd want to lynch a non-poster of all targets.
Firstly, I haven't been 'buddying' with you. Going from "this claim doesn't make much sense for mafia but could be a gambit" to "he's probably legit because of XYZ in his reads list" =/= buddying. Calling out RLVG's poor logic without sheeping your reasoning also doesn't qualify.4) I mentioned this several times, and it is starting to feel like one of those too good to be true type scenarios. Calix never buddies me this hard, the other guy is either town or a really strong day 1 mafia play, who the fuck knows what I am, and we have two MIA. If B turns out to be a double mafia group, we could potentially just hit runner runner...
I don't know what to think. Every fucking word is a blur, nobody even mentions group 1, like what the fuck do we do with that group.
We also haven't played enough games together for you to go "Calix never does X this much"
I accept this explanation. I like the comparison in the second paragraph in particular.
So both town and scum try to pick group in the name of scum-hunting.
That mean one of the player who's trying to scum-hunting right now is a Mafia. But....that only can reduce a little bit risk so far....
v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~
-unvote
Group 2 is not a good pick with so many afk/lurker so far. Beside nobody give a damn about them anyway...
v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~
Players who've posted:
Titus - null
Shapelog - null-leaning-scum
Calix - Lean-town
Jealous - Town
Duck - I trust his claim and would like to keep him at least until D2 to see how his role and play evolve.
Yuki - Null
Ginger - Null
Kovath - Null
RLVG - Null
This set-up obliges lynches to happen everyday. My mentor told me that PLs are forseeable when you don't have a strong scum-read on anyone, and this is the situation I'm in right now.
What idea do you entertain?
v)o.o)^
A rare Yuki in ultimate form
Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~