here, i guess I need a profile picture. also didn't vote for a stage.
we should probably just RNG the stages unless someone claims (no i'm not advocating for someone to claim).
How is that a Scummy response? IIRC you are saying you don't need to give a reason for voting because a situation in the future may happen that warrants the vote. This is not a Townie mentality to have because its very easy (too easy) for Scum to use the same method of voting and excuse away their bad votes for what happens in the future when in the past is where the vote was cast.
Most likely does not equal sure. I can spend time on babbling about all the other less likely possibilites and explainin them. but it would waste time and constantly distract things. im happy to stick with the most logical situation, rarther than the illogical ones.
Instead you dig on "how u play" compared to me, so suck it if we play differently. different ways of playing is not a scum/town tell
i am not the optimal player. so suck it im not perfect, its no just cause to vote me. because what you are saying here is that i'm just a shit town person.
unless you are saying all what i have done is scummy then explain why
I have a feeling i know who reaper and pharah are and it's town's best interest to just lynch one of them straight away.
pharah v reaper is tvt. move along every1.
This is a stupid post. Reaper is doing exactly what he is accusing Pharaoh of doing.
-vote M-FM Reaper
Again, derailing the game by accusing Pharah of derailing the game, when Pharah (at this point) is doing the most to push the game along.
This is also very bad. "You're being awful defensive, aren't you" definitely insinuates guilt. "I didn't say that was a scum tell" backs out of taking a position on the question, while still leaving the insinuation behind.
Found the role hunter.
Imagination is the essence of discovery.
my vote will be plonking onto M-FM Hanzo for her poor attempt of defending themselves and instead going on the offensive on me. i would of been happy with the expllination of "you have to consider alternatives though"
instead he goes on the attacks, claims my assumption was completly wrong without valid explination, and whatver comment I make about him, he just repeats at me. rarther than trying to discuss it he is trying to make me appear scum like, to stop people townreading me.
-vote M-FM Hanzo
winston, hypocrisy isn't a scum tell.
-vote M-FM Winston
much happier with my vote here. that opening post felt contrived and overdone.
It's posts like these that make me disagree with you. Why are you telling people what you want to hear? There shouldn't be an ideal play that you're looking for. You said so yourself, you play different than me but you expect me to say what you would like to here. You also say that I've dis valued your comments but you just did the same thing yourself. My point is your arguments are even more flawed then mine are, and the fact that you swapped your vote to someone voting you is rather suspicious.
@Win ston don't feel like quoting your post, but it's more of an observation on the attitude change.
bad plays or personal preference. two different things. but that can wait until after the game because it would be a waste of time.
what on gods earth is how you are punishing me? rather than wasting my time? save your "punishing bad players" another time and focus on "lynching scum"
Nope, I am actually discouraging that action through my action against it.
I have to disagree. There is no reason for Pharah to make those posts, regardless of if they are pushing content along.Again, derailing the game by accusing Pharah of derailing the game, when Pharah (at this point) is doing the most to push the game along.
I don't think its bad at all because I understood Hanzo's perspective immediately even before they explained it.This is also very bad. "You're being awful defensive, aren't you" definitely insinuates guilt. "I didn't say that was a scum tell" backs out of taking a position on the question, while still leaving the insinuation behind.
Nope, I was just pointing out what was obvious.Found the role hunter.
you wanted people to focus on the unlikely senarios, if everony did that we would waste time and focus on un-nessisecy things. its ok to point it out. But to completly invalidate the most logical assumption, for less likely senarios with no valid reasoning is not what you would want to do. Unless you where scum. then what you did would be the right thing for you to do.
WOT IZ THIS?
i put my vote onto the person i am having an arguement with? and because they placed their vote first, this must mean that my vote is scummy?
your logic is shit.
Torbs post was retarded, really looked like he is picking on active players.
Winston had one post, and I can't really say it was a good scum reading post, but it shows effort.
Reaper/Parah I have an impression, but I would rather share it for the time being for reasons.
quit infighting you nerds and vote winston.
seems like M-FM McCree left us with 1 post. keep an eye here.
Yes. Pharah is already shining as the most town player, ans Reaper is trying to paint her as someone who isn't contributing to the game / focusing on the wrong things. Aka working against what Pharah is doing.
I disagree. Scum tend to insuinate things without taking a hard stance and while trying to remain as neutral as possible.
and the picture + quote over-dramatises his point a little too much for my liking.
Empirical evidence suggests I'm a real animal.
while we're on lurkers i would vote for one if we get stumped around 24 hours near the end of the day
last fm got ruined by them so lets not do that again