[23:19:33] DarknessB: Sino is Mass Murderer -- I don't care if there isn't one in the setup!
[23:19:39] DarknessB:-vote Sino
1) I have never played with you.
2) your vote isn't going to get any fucking traction when you just vote for someone with no reason given.
3) G4slight is far from the optimal lynch at this point.
In conclusion: Its a shitty vote that goes nowhere and I have no idea what you were thinking making a naked vote.
[23:19:33] DarknessB: Sino is Mass Murderer -- I don't care if there isn't one in the setup!
[23:19:39] DarknessB:-vote Sino
I do not at all like what Kenshin has done this game, but that massive "I'm ignoring you" and the huge troll-face image is similar vibe like I got from SP's "I'm straight-up ignoring these two players) in Music. When I read over this player's post, it feels way too overt to be scum- That's why I'm reading atm as shitty but trying townie. In terms of playstyle disagreement, I am extremely not in tune with the playstyle of the Quick part of Kenshin (see Day 1 Sandbox). I am not using meta comparisons between play in those two games to make alignment judgments, but was pointing out a conditioner for my read in a potential inherent scummy bias I have in making the read I am as I feel it's not useful to town.
Gaslight and Voss are not similar in their reads and playstyle, it was mainly about the first two sentences in my G4slight read which was about not having enough to read town or scum motivation. I would obviously like production to pick up soon from both slots.
My choice of No-Lynch as my term was a very deliberate one, as things I used to consider strong town tells like logic and moving the discussion along, I am much less strong on now. I simply make the distinction that I would prefer not to lynch such an individual on the day, which has the same functional purpose.
I'm looking back through my posts, I thought I had talked a bit about reservations on Unknown... odd, I guess I didn't (maybe I was thinking about Kenshin). Either way, I do think Unknown has been trying this game. I am looking back through his posts (mainly the recent ones, tbh) and can see some town perspective- it is not a town perspective I particularly like, but I acknowledge that it could be there. For example, pushing hard on read justification- if he was scum then it'd be really foolish to keep doing that even after getting answers. I perceive this more as town who isn't seeing rather than scum, as scum would have risk of being pinged or discredited for that kind of behavior. It is a read that is still evolving, though I do not find this possibility of town perspective to outweigh my earlier pings of his play, which is why I am still scumreading him. Shifty is the far stronger one.
As for Duck / Shifty, yeah, I admit I was potentially a bit inconsistent. I reiterate that I just didn't see enough to push it any harder, didn't see any particularly adverse reaction from Duck. My explanation afterwards is for why I didn't look to bring it back up again later.
Death, yet the Town.
~The Town Code
@Kovath why have you randomly flipped your opinion on me since you thought you had stuff on me that you didn't?
Whether I agreed with his reads or not is of no consequence as you have stated that just because you don't agree with the reads someone gives doesn't mean I can't see the thought process behind them. Kovath very clearly has been very upfront about their thought process the entire game. Could he be faking it? I suppose, but there are way more efficient ways to play scum.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you're using meta. lol
Anything in particular that makes you think Quick ISN'T just daring scum?
I'm of the opinion that you can get a read from a few posts. Now that you have the bigger picture with everyone having posted (and most having voted), you can go through and place them.
I gathered it was deliberate. Does that apply to your unwillingness to say that many players are town? (in a game with 10 of them)
Mate, the problem is that you don't EXPLAIN anything like, ever. Not until someone holds your hand and prods you for such contributions. This is why I am struggling to take you seriously - you are clearly capable of high-level contributions yet you fail to provide them until your neck is on the line.
Why do you conflate high effort with a townie alignment? Given that scum are perfectly capable of scum-hunting in this setup and would put in effort for that reason, this is an extremely flawed metric for reading players.
Your description of Unknown can also apply to you, can it not? Much like I am with you, you are using his earlier posts to explain why you are scum-reading him now. What makes these two situations different in your eyes.
I like how you actually admit that you are inconsistent.
I think Kovath's explanation here sums it up for me, which leads me to believe Unknown deflecting for Shifty means he knows their alignment, also that last post by unknown just seems really forced and convoluted. So basically "anyone can do anything at any time and nothing is alignment indicative. I know thats a bit of hyperbole, but you can see how dangerous of a door that is to leave open.
I was busy, said I was going to be out, and said so.
Thanks for the well thought information
You gotta read and develop your own opinions. If you use other people's summary you can easily back out of it later.
This is better, however I don't have duck as scum for the spam, I still have that slot at null. Sino, I'm leaning scum on as the questions seem kinda forced, and an easy way to hide as scum.
Uhh okay, everyone else has already excoriated you for this so I'll refrain, but this is probably the most anti-town play you could of made with if this is true.
So basically you've solved the game? How would anyone be able to pick out you being a TPR based on your post quality and content up to this point? It seems super egotistical and gotcha-y this line of thinking isn't very helpful if you are just going to tunnel based on that fact. Also asking for the GF and consign to reveal is super reckless.
Your in no way confirmed, since the possibilities of tailors etc. However I do prefer to err in caution, so unless something develops from pages 31 on I won't be voting you.
Seems solid enough
I wasn't aware of your "defending meta" however I'm still not a fan. I do like the perceived tone I got from reading this, you seemed like a townie explaining your case, versus squirming.
You've played with me before and I've stated why I vote for #11 it's my traditional start of game vote.
Kovath just flipped me from scum to town and then said he didn't. Am I reading this wrong?
I think your questions are easy places to hide and act like you are actually doing something. I don't think they are effectual and your lack of insightful followup makes them feel hollow. I'm sorry if I missed a lot of things. I'm rushing to catch up as soon as possible. I'll be out for a couple hours and then will continue.
PTB RETIRED FROM STAFF WE ARE ALL SAVED HORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYY
drinks on the duckinator lets celebrate. I was going to sodoku him, but now I dont yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Add Fatalis to null.