"It's not my fault I was lackluster and nonexistent! It's the QTs fault!!"
"I knew it wasKovathMattZed! Yet the only thing I said about him and Kovath were:
AndOriginally Posted by Unknown
And not to mention my useless responses to this exchange:Originally Posted by Unknown
Originally Posted by BananaOriginally Posted by UnknownOriginally Posted by BananaBut I totally knew it wasOriginally Posted by UnknownKovathMattZed guys!"
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
I initially read mattzed as mafia day1, but he made several comments that seemed too towny to ever really go against him.
I think the biggest error I made, and maybe others? was approaching the game as a 5v2 and not essentially two neutrals working together.
The reason unknown was the best lynch on the day I got modkilled was because him flipping town would force a 1v1 between kovath and mattzed and we could reevaluate between those two rather than letting them do nothing for the rest of the game. As it played out I assume mattzed was able to just coast.
You lose credit because within a two hour span you put me from top town, to "I should have known you were scum", with you saying you had me as town because you felt pressured into doing so, into having me as your town again. If you just stick with your reads and explain them people will give you credit regardless if they agree with them. The problem was you would not give reads when asked or explain any of your thoughts. I started to shift away from my mafia read on you, but you made it very difficult with your lack of communication and inconsistent reads.
I don't know why anyone scum read unknown ever. He was very obviously the village idiot, but not scummy
Originally Posted by BananaCucho
Yeah I started to realize that mid day 2, but for some reason I thought I remembered someone telling me he was not a bad player, so I thought all of his posts in the previous game were his hydra. If I knew that he was actually just his current skill level I would not have mafia read him, that tunnel was bad preparation by me.
This is why she is shit talking you. You keep information because you think nobody is listening? I told you multiple times that I listened to everything you said, but you needed to stop focusing on dumb things like "well its 99.9% this game and not 100% that im mafia". Give us your information, and if we don't listen to you it is OUR faults, not yours.
I did not think you were partners. I saw you flailing votes all over the place with very inconsistent reasoning and could very easily see see your actions coming from a scum perspective on the lynch or loose day.
I did say this for the post gambit reaction read. That was not a 'permanently do this' kind of thing. You can not really use that as an excuse when like 12 hours later I posted that Duck was now my top town read. Just saying.
See above response to Unknown
Honestly my gambit semi cleared you resulting in players much more strongly town reading you. I still consider what you did game throwing. If you had not done that it would have been a very different game. I strongly believe that your move there was directly playing against your win condition and hurt the town at a time when people were finally active and there was pressure floating around. Not saying town would have won if you had not done that but it would have been a different game. I could have seen the final 3 turning out to be Me, You and MZ at that point most likely with you making the final lynch call between me and MZ. You really need to think before you act bro. You started flipping out the same way at the end of D1. When you get upset just walk away and relax for a bit instead of doing something insane.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Its just something you need to work on as a player. Provide more reasoning with your reads and present them in a way that explains your thinking and people will listen to you more. I would argue that being able to persuade players to lynch your scum read is every bit as important if not more so than being able to identify scum. The objective of the game is not to identify scum but rather to eliminate them.
I consistently argue that when a player rants in the post game that they 100% knew some player was scum they played worse than someone who did not realize simply because if this were true they had the game solved and still failed to win. At least other players can plea ignorance. (This is not what unknown is doing, I am just pointing it out to argue the importance of being able to communicate your reads and push lynches)
I break down town play into:
Getting read in the way you want (As town or not scummy enough to be lynched/night killed)
Scumhunting to identify players alignments
Being able to push your reads to get the town coordinated enough to follow them when you think you have pegged a scum player
If a player fails at any one of these 3 things the other 2 become useless. I look poorly on players that argue they had a good game just because they identified scum when they failed in 1 or 2 equally if not more important parts.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.