In before fb is night immune neutral evil or night immune gf
Just pointing this out, if there's any actual reported personal attacks, I might initiate a casus belli or something.
Random reveal : There's no ventriloquist who takes over your account and speaks for you.
So I see. Now I feel bad.
@Calix , I told you I was eating. And it was good food
Day 1 doesn't mean we can't plan out our lynches for tomorrow.
You people have an idea of who you would be willing to lynch?
Would rather no-lynch than lynch these players:
Firebringer
Calix
Funce
TheDankestMeme
Stealthbomber16
Would lynch rather than no lynch:
Ernst Starvo Blofeld
AIVION
Gyrlander
Didn't even appear on my radar (all of these players I would lynch):
Ika & Silverwolf Hydra (Empathy17)
Mikecall
Sen
Freebird
Thank you Anonymous Donor
I have no idea why you would mention me to tell me that you had a good lunch/ dinner/ whatever, lol. Glad to hear it, hope it was something healthy so you don't die of diabetes or whatever?
I have to disagree with Mikecall being null/ not on the radar, only because he was being strait-lace with his responses to Trump quotes and that is hilarious.
Also you just picked the active posters on a No Lynch Day as 'not lynching' - why? Do you think we all have similar intentions for posting as much as we have?
Why are SuperJack, AIVION and Gyrlander all in the 'Lynch > No Lynch' bloc.
Why did you word your reads like that? Why not 'town', 'null' and 'scum'?
Don't know what the fuck happened to the post, but I wasn't quoting that and half of the post dissapeared. I actually said this:
Answering to Calix:
I know I wrote it badly, but I meant the same from the beggining e.e
To secondpassing:
You rather lynch me that not lynch me? If this continues like that I won't vote you!!
Thank you Anonymous Donor
Oh my goodness there are so many questions in this post. See if I can get them all.
Well, I have been eating more healthy stuff. Anyway that wasn't the point of the post.
I'd probably have changed the wording if this was day 2, and we got a flip. (I was playing with the idea that RLVG would hide flips or flip people the opposite what they were, its not likely that he thought of that and decided to implement it)
So far, none of you have given a read list (actually I haven't either). I like to keep active posters posting. Especially Calix, can't lynch Calix early. And yes I think you all have similar intentions for posting as much as you have, barring the exception of Blofeld.
No idea where SuperJack is, is he Blofeld? Will come back to this. AIVION hasn't really posted. Would definitely lynch an inactive slot tomorrow. Gyrlander's posts seem especially scummy in some places. I think it was in your Great Wall post, you highlighted two parts in green, yet you didn't comment on the scummy first sentence.
Setup is supposed to be hidden and stuff. And these are not my reads, it's my to-lynch list, though you can assume that everybody in green is a town read of some sort or important enough, and that I would sheep any train on a player I wish to lynch.
If RLVG decided to change flips, your Last Will would easily counter that. It would be an extremely bastard mechanic, especially on top of delayed reveals. Either way, I don't consider that a valid reason for the odd wording of the reads.
Bitch please, they are reads if you are using them as a way of deciding who to lynch.
Why do you always keep me off the table for a lynch? Activity =/= town alignment; something I have proven on multiple occasions already.
Blofeld is SJ, yeah.
Why are you advocating a policy lynch when we would have more information tomorrow? That's scummy as shit, man.
I didn't read the 'I posted because I felt like it' attitude as scummy. Quite the opposite, actually.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
Then you can take them as reads. I would sheep my town reads on everything else except those in my don't lynch list. To me, they are very separate things. I'll probably post a read list if I feel like it tomorrow. My idea here is to formulate a stance.
Calix pushes forward discussion. There's a certain type of player that I would keep around. (I probably wouldn't be able to pin you down in a day anyway. So if you are scum please talk yourself to death )
Blofeld has been inhibiting discussion. While we have been all posting fluff, Blofeld has added the most amount of negative posts. Also, there isn't a good post from them. Just compare to everyone else.
So.. are you saying you wouldn't policy lynch if we didn't have more information tomorrow? I'll work as I go. I guess a disclaimer is necessary:
Lynch-list positions subject to heavy change.
What makes you confident enough to sheep your town reads this early on? Why would you be sheeping them instead of leading discussion?
Why did you refer to me in the third person suddenly? Sure you would try and fail to read me but it's not about being wrong, it's about the process. Blah blah blah I will keep saying this until people stop being pathetic fuckasses and just post their thoughts on players like they're supposed to do.
How has SJ 'inhibited' discussion?
4) You have a tendency to sheep what other people are doing. If we post seriously, you step it up. If we shit-post, you try it out too. That's what I was calling you out for.
Firebringer's buddying of Calix is actually quite worrisome.
~SW
Also Calix has never scared me. Not sure where that rep comes from.
~SW
I've already pointed one out, do you think you could find some posts where I would see it and go, "Yep, this player needs to die." I will be looking into this as well.
Other people will tell you otherwise, but in this game, I'm a believer of null until proven innocent. Where null turns to scum when they fail to prove themselves.
I don't expect everybody to think the same way I do, but my hope is that they understand what I am saying. If something gets too hard for you to understand (of me), feel free to ask. It's probably because I make the "begging the question" logical fallacy often.