A Reminder

[Luna]

1 thing I DO NOT want to see are investigator/sheriff descriptions. DR will almost definitely change descriptions so that all the roles in the game have a pairing. Whatever you put will probably be overlooked and discarded. Don't waste your time thinking about it.

Almost every single suggestion includes an Investigator description. It only bugs me because people have either spent lots of time following the rest of the Suggestion guidelines only to still do this, or respected members of this community criticise others for not following the guidelines but STILL post investigator messages of their own.

It's 4am and I sometimes make weird posts when tired, but I think this is a valid (albeit pedantic) point which warrants no further discussion. KNEEL BEFORE ZOD.

[jaczac]

I'm not kneeling

[BorkBot]

Personally, I think that's a very odd guideline. I can see why they'd not want suggestions to come with completely new sheriff / investigator descriptions, but those descriptions have a strong impact on any role's effect on the metagame. For that reason, it seems perfectly fine for role suggestions to propose an existing invest/sheriff message to go along with it.

In the end, DR is free to change anything about a role suggestion as he sees fit. That's not limited to sheriff/invest messages.

[Lazers]

The whole point of suggestions are to sway the guy in charge of the game/thing to change something or to add something. Investigation messages are meant to sway DR to using that message. Unneeded guideline, really.