Hat beats Pants for chance at gold
Register

User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. ISO #1

  2. ISO #2

    Re: Hat beats Pants for chance at gold

    What I think is funny is that at the 2010 Winter Olympics, USA ordered medals by # Gold, followed by # of Silver, followed by # of Bronze. But now that they're not leading in # of golds, I see more USA news channels ordering it by Total Medals for majority of the Olympics because it put them on the leaderboard XD Propaganda.

  3. ISO #3

    Re: Hat beats Pants for chance at gold

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    What I think is funny is that at the 2010 Winter Olympics, USA ordered medals by # Gold, followed by # of Silver, followed by # of Bronze. But now that they're not leading in # of golds, I see more USA news channels ordering it by Total Medals for majority of the Olympics because it put them on the leaderboard XD Propaganda.
    Lol. And I'm pretty sure before Golds have counted for more than Silver and Bronze when it conveniently put us in the lead. . .
    America.

  4. ISO #4

    Re: Hat beats Pants for chance at gold

    I think the Olympic committee ranks by # Golds, then # Silver, then # Bronze.
    So if you have 1 gold, 0 silver, 1 bronze, you're ahead of a country that have 0 gold, 40 silver, 0 bronze lol


    But the post I made above was only relevant at the beginning of the olympics lol. Now USA is on leaderboard regardless.

  5. ISO #5

  6. ISO #6

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •