S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency - Page 3
Register

User Tag List

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 150 of 400
  1. ISO #101

  2. ISO #102

  3. ISO #103

  4. ISO #104

  5. ISO #105

  6. ISO #106

  7. ISO #107

  8. ISO #108

  9. ISO #109

  10. ISO #110

  11. ISO #111

  12. ISO #112

  13. ISO #113

  14. ISO #114

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by Dagaen View Post
    Appley, any particular reason why you chose those two guys?

    Also Magician is not that far away from Foolish, we have to keep that in mind. It wouldn't be that hard to fake.
    No. All I know is if it gives feedback, Clementine wouldn't lie if she were town.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    You should be priviledged to experience bestmas.

    "waah the screen is shaking, waah my delicate eyes".

    Fuck sake.

  15. ISO #115

  16. ISO #116

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by Bahkieh View Post
    -vote Bahkieh


    Just to keep it at L-2. I will be on constantly tonight seeing as how I dont have anything to do and I don't sleep at night.
    The code is [unvote][/unvote]
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    You should be priviledged to experience bestmas.

    "waah the screen is shaking, waah my delicate eyes".

    Fuck sake.

  17. ISO #117

  18. ISO #118

  19. ISO #119

  20. ISO #120

  21. ISO #121

  22. ISO #122

  23. ISO #123

  24. ISO #124

  25. ISO #125

  26. ISO #126

  27. ISO #127

  28. ISO #128

  29. ISO #129

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by Bahkieh View Post
    First things first. I have received no feedback. I would very much like a claim from Clementine. She was the one who had info on a citizen who was unfortunately lynched.
    I definitely agree.

    -vote Clementine


    That lynch was totally unjustified. Clementine need to start talking. Also Glip didnt die last night so Glip should be able to talk today. He have no reasons to not talk today.
    I got a feedback/letter last night so I wasn't hit by forgetful. I also posted so I wasnt hit by insomnia.

  30. ISO #130

  31. ISO #131

  32. ISO #132

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by powerofdeath View Post
    I definitely agree.

    -vote Clementine


    That lynch was totally unjustified. Clementine need to start talking. Also Glip didnt die last night so Glip should be able to talk today. He have no reasons to not talk today.
    I got a feedback/letter last night so I wasn't hit by forgetful. I also posted so I wasnt hit by insomnia.
    Lol
    Says the guy who hammered.

    Also unknown feedback away from skype and no PMs
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    You should be priviledged to experience bestmas.

    "waah the screen is shaking, waah my delicate eyes".

    Fuck sake.

  33. ISO #133

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by RLVG View Post
    So now that I'm not asleep, literally, I like to suspect Appley.

    1. His role claim from previous.
    2. His action together with the claim.

    It's extremely suspicious.
    I moved clementine tonight to target powerofdeath.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    You should be priviledged to experience bestmas.

    "waah the screen is shaking, waah my delicate eyes".

    Fuck sake.

  34. ISO #134

  35. ISO #135

  36. ISO #136

  37. ISO #137

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by RLVG View Post
    So you claim Mage. It's suspicious for two reasons, or three.
    That continuing pressure.
    I stick by my mage claim and
    N1 - clem to citrus
    N2 - clem to pod

    I'm playing this game by ear since there are no direct killing roles.

    I got a pm!
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    You should be priviledged to experience bestmas.

    "waah the screen is shaking, waah my delicate eyes".

    Fuck sake.

  38. ISO #138

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by AppleyNO View Post
    That continuing pressure.
    I stick by my mage claim and
    N1 - clem to citrus
    N2 - clem to pod

    I'm playing this game by ear since there are no direct killing roles.

    I got a pm!
    Mage.

    N1 Clem to Citrus.
    N2 Appley to Clem.

    PM Received : Det asking me if it's OK to check me.

  39. ISO #139

  40. ISO #140

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by RLVG View Post
    Mage.

    N1 Clem to Citrus.
    N2 Appley to Clem.

    PM Received : Det asking me if it's OK to check me.
    Confirmed, I was witched last night.

    Clem asked me why I would follow her lynch even when she said she visited citrus....
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    You should be priviledged to experience bestmas.

    "waah the screen is shaking, waah my delicate eyes".

    Fuck sake.

  41. ISO #141

  42. ISO #142

  43. ISO #143

  44. ISO #144

  45. ISO #145

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Appley, if you're really Mage, I propose this idea to ruin this game.

    1. Detective checks someone other than our witched targets and ourselves.
    2. I witch someone on to a specific target X.
    3. You witch someone on to a specific target X.

    We now have a Confirmed Detective, Confirmed Double Mage and hopefully one of our targets.

    X should be double targeted and if X dies, we have hit jackpot.
    1. Detective know if someone targeted X.
    2. We can round up that our targets visited X.

    We have now found out that someone visited X and it's not the three confirmed roles.



    Snitch : Can confirm himself.
    Matchmaker : Can confirm himself.
    Med Student : Confirm by Roleblock.
    Citizen : Can't visit unless witched.



    GG.

  46. ISO #146

  47. ISO #147

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Ugh time to come clean. I am a citizen and I was pulling a gambit after receiving the witched feedback on N1. Unfortunately I didn't have time to come back to post here after Citrus claimed since I got busier than expected.

    I received no magician/foolish feedback last night. I believe AppleyNO could be lying about targeting me twice to "prove" that he is not Foolish since I was "targeted" by him twice and did not die.

    So I'm surprised that people followed me yesterday. Chain of events:
    1. clem claims incriminating results on Citrus
    2. people vote Citrus
    3. AppleyNO claims he forced me to target Citrus
    4. Citrus gets hammered

    Since when do power roles get informed of the exact person they targeted in their feedback, hmm? My goal was to start a random train and see if a town member jumps up to stop the train since he is a town magician who witched me, see who didn't comment on it since they don't know about the witching, and who acts like a potential foolish who witched me. It's not even sure if we have a foolish or if it's a town magician.

    I find it really extremely unlikely that AppleyNO witched me onto the person who I random accused yesterday. But is this more town or non town motivation:
    Scenarios:
    1. AppleyNO is town and witched me onto Citrus. Wouldn't AppleyNO wonder how I knew I visited Citrus if I was witched? I think he didn't ask enough questions about this for it to be actually true. I wonder why AppleyNO didn't try to stop the train.
    2. AppleyNO is town and witched me onto someone other than Citrus. AppleyNO in this case has a scum read on Citrus and wants him lynched anyway. Seems pretty unlikely since he didn't vote Citrus.
    2. AppleyNO is scum and witched me onto Citrus. He is trying to gain towncred by being as open as possible. Knows citrus is scum since I claimed results and actually did target Citrus and wants town points since I know I was witched.
    3. AppleyNO is scum and witched me onto someone else. Trying to gain towncred by claiming his action. Wants Citrus lynched because he has a PR read on him or something?

    tl;dr I think scenario 3 is most likely. AppleyNO is scum, witched me onto Ctirus and was trying to gain towncred by claiming he witched me onto Citrus when I got my "PR results".
    The haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate
    Baby, I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake, shake, shake
    I shake it off, I shake it off

  48. ISO #148

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Another alternative is that I was targeted by AppleyNO and a Forgetful, meaning that AppleyNO is town if he really did target me.

    This is kind of weird though that RLVG says that he forced AppleyNO to targeted me after AppleyNO said he targeted me. Why didn't AppleyNO claim witched when he said his feedback?
    The haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate
    Baby, I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake, shake, shake
    I shake it off, I shake it off

  49. ISO #149

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Can anyone confirm if they sent me a message last night because I received no feedback. If I was supposed to receive a message but didn't it means I was targeted by a Forgetful and that AppleyNO is confirmed town.
    The haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate
    Baby, I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake, shake, shake
    I shake it off, I shake it off

  50. ISO #150

    Re: S-FM 127: Minor Inconsistency

    Quote Originally Posted by clementine View Post
    Can anyone confirm if they sent me a message last night because I received no feedback. If I was supposed to receive a message but didn't it means I was targeted by a Forgetful and that AppleyNO is confirmed town.
    This was actually my PM.


    "Greetings. I'm RLVG. What is your role?
    I've already claimed.

    FoS on Appley."


    I'll come with the full thing :
    I suspect Appley, and witched him on to Clem to see if Clem would die or get a negative feedback in order to out Appley.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •