Post 129.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
Can actually do it with PoD, Kirsche, Banshis
Ganondorf feel free to actually show ya scummy lurker (like many others)
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
I think one of the survivor-claimers is lying. I think we should lynch one of the survivor claimers for several reasons:
A) If we lynch a survivor claimer, we are guaranteed to AT LEAST be lynching one person who isn't town-aligned (either a survivor or a liar)
B) If we lynch a survivor claimer and he is linked, then the Maniac cannot kill tonight
C) There is a chance the survivor claimer could be linked with the Witch or Maniac
I find Citrus incredibly suspicious at this moment.
AKA Othnia (Battle.net ID): formerly in FMs II-XII.
So, by my previous logic....
-vote Clementine
Because I find him more suspicious than Nick.
AKA Othnia (Battle.net ID): formerly in FMs II-XII.
Why join the train when town do not have any idea whom to lynch? As clementine said, we might hammer, but not lead trains.
If we are to lynch, I highly advise we lynch Clementine. Nick, if you are not paired with Clementine, then this will guarantee you another night of survival and hopefully carry you over to a point where we can deal with the maniac and/or witch directly...
AKA Othnia (Battle.net ID): formerly in FMs II-XII.
This is a setup town only has one investigative role.
This excuse works in other setup but not here.
Either you help push the tide or the tide will push you.
Considering you claimed first, I will be hostile toward Clementine first.
I have to say I also would vote Ganondorf because it serves personal purposes.
Then again, none of the candidate is at L2, claimed survivor should do what you should.
Survivor doesn't fear night but fear the day.
You want to skip every day phrase plainly serving your own goal.
However, if you want to do so, better lynch than not.
The longer the discussion, the more hate will point toward survivors.
Fires spread itself, no one can avoid.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
You are just jealous about our survivor block. Using us survivors as scapegoat.
Also, Survivors will not hammer anyone who linked to them.
It is bloody clear that hammer of survivor is not trustworthy in this setup.
Unless Survivor hammer each other to make it up, which clearly not possible.
Clementine said he will follow nick(most of time), this buddy ship means his hammer will be as soft as candy cotton.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
I'm not afraid by your threats. Town is LYLO today. And you know it. Why don't you go lynch pairs. Higher chance to hit scum.
That said, with such town around, it makes me mad. I'm thinking of inviting Sadist to our block. Upgrade to neutral block. Now we have neutral power. Fear no scums nor town because we are influential.
Sadist can be lynched tomorrow.
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
NEUTRALS UNITE!
*evil laugh of Sadist*
When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.
I like you. So I advice you to go lynch some lurker instead.
-vote Ganondorf
Fuck this if CarolinaCrown and DW are afk and both are traitors.... We lost this.
^this is honestly fuck in stupid if we're in lylo and are missing town players. Even the evil roles would be interested in a mislynch. Ugh why sign up if you're not going to play people >. <
1) highest priority is to eliminate scum
2) scum will defend themselves. Ganon popped in then disappeared again - I think if he were town he would stick around more. He also threw suspicion on me, so he's either not reading the thread carefully (cleared by sheriff) or he wants to be tunneled aka sadist.
Dames did the same thing, but at least a vote was moved. Ganon is likely the only viable lynch today - especially when he leaves his vote on clem and disappears. It means he stands by a clem lynch or no lynch at all if he doesn't show up again.
Also his vote on clem has a bit of omgus character
Looks like PoD has no interest in responding to my criticisms.
Do you guys want me to consolidate? I'd much rather a PoD lynch though.
Isn't this fun?
Isn't this what life's all about?
Isn't this a dream come true?
Isn't this a nightmare, too?
Well by this post he is essentially saying he is a survivor. The only reason he assumes one of them is lying unless he is the sadist. So I guess we will still end up killing someone who isn't town with a lynch through him.-vote Ganondorf
Deathworlds is still scummy imo with his claim of citizen then left and never talked again.
Happy thanksgiving!
Sorry I've been so inactive. I think louiswill is the real sheriff, and I'm also completely in favor of lynching neutrals. That being said, Ganon has seemed a little scummy, aiming straight for the neutrals without much desire to scumhunt. He is my link partner, so I ask that I be allowed to hammer if that decision is made
This. We may have more to work on as the game progresses, but for the time being I see an extreme lack of arguments against a ganon lynch.
Additionally please be careful with vote placement everyone, because it can help communicate who you're linked with.
@Survivor it's really lucky you guys have an auto-vest just saying.
How do you guys feel about claiming who you're linked with in last wills?
Happy Thanksgiving!
At this point I'd prefer an early hammer over the possibility of none at all. I do believe your link aim, and I guess you're soft claiming victim with that?
I'm just concerned we won't pull a lynch off, especially as we need every town vote we have to pull a lynch off, so you can naturally see the fear with leaving the hammer to someone. If you do end up with the hammer please drop it as early as you can. Keep in mind doc can heal you tonight if a lynch is completed (or do they die together instantly? Can't check setup on phone sorry)
Kirsche, are you a sadist or something?
The day will end at the same time as before, which is 3 hours from now, if no lynch is made.
Spoiler : Forum Mafia History :
3 hours. That leaves little time.
I love how all the fuckers that aren't posting came in to post a couple times then left again. (Deathworlds) (Ganondorf) (Kirsche)
Everyone who doesn't have a vote placed by day end is scummy. Plus Ganon because he voted Clem the survivor claim and has minimal contributions beyond that
So no modkills for 1 post and runs?
Not to sound broken but vote damn you