Quote Originally Posted by FM Galloway View Post
Its a risk. A huge risk to take letting a confirmed scum live another day to scheme with his allies. We can plan all we want and thats no problem but here we are relying on a scum to help us move on to success. We cannot let the day go without a lynch thats for sure but we cannot blindly trust Dunn the scum here. Leary is definatly showing scum colors and with Dunn trying to lynch him we can be assured that Leary is at least not mafia. I can agree with pressure and going from there but out right lyching based on a scum's word is ridiculous. Besides, if anything I would feel much better lynching Hopgood, based on his connection with Ballard, than Leary based on Dunns word. However my stance is solely based on the fact that it is a scum telling us what to do. If there is anything else showing that Leary is put on the spotlight because of things not related to Dunn I am more willing to pursue him. Based on my own investigations I can come to the conclusion that Leary has played before and that would mean he is more skilled at blending and his posts support that aspect of things.

tl;dr If there is more to Leary than Dunns word yes. Otherwise no.
Leary had actually FoSed me on Day 4. So had Hopgood. Ballard did too. It links the three together in a nice little package. That's why I started this route.