S-FM 83 Double Killers - Page 5
Register

User Tag List

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
Results 201 to 249 of 249
  1. ISO #201

  2. ISO #202

  3. ISO #203

  4. ISO #204

  5. ISO #205

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    My thought process during this game:

    *I get replacement message*
    "Okay sure, why not."

    *I get SK*
    "Goddamnit."

    *I was about to go to bed, day starts early.*
    "Goddamnit."

    *I see that I killed my fellow SK Bunny.*
    "Goddamnit."



    I do think that SK should be immune during the night. It's essentially a trade off, 1 KPN vs the identity of the other SK. 7vs2 + 1 Neutral would be a good game IMO.
    Quote Originally Posted by Efekannn02 View Post
    i scumreaded him because his posts were gay
    Quote Originally Posted by Magoroth View Post
    ah fuck.
    I HARDCLAIM MASON ASSASSIN.

  6. ISO #206

  7. ISO #207

  8. ISO #208

  9. ISO #209

  10. ISO #210

  11. ISO #211

  12. ISO #212

  13. ISO #213

  14. ISO #214

  15. ISO #215

  16. ISO #216

  17. ISO #217

  18. ISO #218

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    the 6 yr old doesnt even know who we are all the kid could go on really is names. there could be some sligt bias (slender getting escort = stalking) but if a host want to hand pick whats to stop them?
    I'm not saying a host can't hand pick roles. Every host has done it before, it's not a big deal to choose them yourself. But, it's NOT better than a RNG. Look at Gerik's game, with clementine and Slaol as scum lol. Someone could've easily picked up on that. Biases are what creates host meta.

    No meta could've been used via pod's way, solely because we didn't know a 6 year old chose our roles during the game. lol

  19. ISO #219

  20. ISO #220

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    I'm not saying a host can't hand pick roles. Every host has done it before, it's not a big deal to choose them yourself. But, it's NOT better than a RNG. Look at Gerik's game, with clementine and Slaol as scum lol. Someone could've easily picked up on that. Biases are what creates host meta.

    No meta could've been used via pod's way, solely because we didn't know a 6 year old chose our roles during the game. lol
    but you used bias in the game right at the begining of day to to say that i was sk did you not?

    again you are just illiterating. random =/= always better. if someone new gets awsome town role and gets lynched becasued they looked scummy to all the good players its bad randoming. look the trust the exe randomed town and target was town. thats bad randoming. if he was town aligned it should of been the foucs on the cult or sk. or have the exe be the nutral and then allow it be there. the fact that randoming can create imballence is the porblem. when host does hand pick they can hand out the roles and make it more ballenced

  21. ISO #221

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunny View Post
    randoming also gives players a variety of roles to play as!
    but also give players to get roles they dislike playing as and then just sit there and not use it. if someone gets randomed a cit role every game, do you think they would still want to play? what if they got role X finnaly just to die n1? The host might make it that they get the role they like and can use.

  22. ISO #222

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    but you used bias in the game right at the begining of day to to say that i was sk did you not?

    again you are just illiterating. random =/= always better. if someone new gets awsome town role and gets lynched becasued they looked scummy to all the good players its bad randoming. look the trust the exe randomed town and target was town. thats bad randoming. if he was town aligned it should of been the foucs on the cult or sk. or have the exe be the nutral and then allow it be there. the fact that randoming can create imballence is the porblem. when host does hand pick they can hand out the roles and make it more ballenced
    he said that because he thinks you dont like me and would kill me n1

    i<3cryptonic

  23. ISO #223

  24. ISO #224

  25. ISO #225

  26. ISO #226

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    but you used bias in the game right at the begining of day to to say that i was sk did you not?

    again you are just illiterating. random =/= always better. if someone new gets awsome town role and gets lynched becasued they looked scummy to all the good players its bad randoming. look the trust the exe randomed town and target was town. thats bad randoming. if he was town aligned it should of been the foucs on the cult or sk. or have the exe be the nutral and then allow it be there. the fact that randoming can create imballence is the porblem. when host does hand pick they can hand out the roles and make it more ballenced
    no, that's bad playing by the person looking scummy, and rushed actions by the "good players".
    And we're talking about roles here, not who an Executioners target is.

    Also, what is illiterating? Not to sound offensive, but I just don't understand what you were trying to say. Being illiterate means one can't read.

    I also agree with Bunny's above post. My last 5 or so games I've completely random'd, because I have been finding it unfair how people are like "Oh, your first game? Citizen. Oh hey, it's creed, he can be Godfather." It just gets old to be given the same roles over and over and over. Randoming gives one more of a variety, and makes it more fair for new players.

    Once again, I'm not saying you can't hand pick your roles. Every host has done this and games work fine. But there have been games where people lynch others because of host meta and were correct.

  27. ISO #227

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    leads to biassed reason. you just renforced my point. thanks for doing that
    And because you can use meta in a game like that.
    You don't random.org your night actions, so it's more likely that you'll be able to guess what someone is going to do. You seemed like someone who would kill Bunny n1, so I jumped on it to see your reaction and make you role claim. If you noticed, I jumped on everyone to try to get people to claim roles and feedback and night actions. lol You weren't singled out.

  28. ISO #228

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    no, that's bad playing by the person looking scummy, and rushed actions by the "good players".
    And we're talking about roles here, not who an Executioners target is.

    Also, what is illiterating? Not to sound offensive, but I just don't understand what you were trying to say. Being illiterate means one can't read.

    I also agree with Bunny's above post. My last 5 or so games I've completely random'd, because I have been finding it unfair how people are like "Oh, your first game? Citizen. Oh hey, it's creed, he can be Godfather." It just gets old to be given the same roles over and over and over. Randoming gives one more of a variety, and makes it more fair for new players.

    Once again, I'm not saying you can't hand pick your roles. Every host has done this and games work fine. But there have been games where people lynch others because of host meta and were correct.
    i was talking about how randoming can be bad. i was talking about how exe target was town you are changing the subject here.

    agree with bunny.... lolz you always do that

    if people use host meta to figure out roles then thats them. all im saying to it is that host hand picking vs randoming both have equal benifits in their own way.

  29. ISO #229

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    And because you can use meta in a game like that.
    You don't random.org your night actions, so it's more likely that you'll be able to guess what someone is going to do. You seemed like someone who would kill Bunny n1, so I jumped on it to see your reaction and make you role claim. If you noticed, I jumped on everyone to try to get people to claim roles and feedback and night actions. lol You weren't singled out.
    accaly its kind fun to random.org n1 actions if you dont have much to go on.

    the moment the day becun you fosed me first on biassed reasoning. when nocitz confirmed me you laied off. i bet if i contiuned you would of contiuned to go on me using your biassed reason

  30. ISO #230

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    i was talking about how randoming can be bad. i was talking about how exe target was town you are changing the subject here.

    agree with bunny.... lolz you always do that

    if people use host meta to figure out roles then thats them. all im saying to it is that host hand picking vs randoming both have equal benifits in their own way.
    lol so you'd rather not play a variety of roles?

    i<3cryptonic

  31. ISO #231

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    i was talking about how randoming can be bad. i was talking about how exe target was town you are changing the subject here.

    agree with bunny.... lolz you always do that

    if people use host meta to figure out roles then thats them. all im saying to it is that host hand picking vs randoming both have equal benifits in their own way.
    No man, you changed the subject, not me! Executioner's targets are always town in FMs, even if they don't specify that they are. It is known that it would throw off the balance if the Exec was targeting a scum.. But we're not talking about Executioner's targets, we're still talking about handing out rolecard lolol The 2 situations are completely independant.

    And me agreeing with Bunny isn't because she's my wife. Even if someone like Slaol said that, I would've agreed. You don't agree that randomly assigning roles gives a larger variety to players? :o I think it would.. I think randoming roles is a lot fairer to all players, rather than giving your friends the good roles.

  32. ISO #232

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    accaly its kind fun to random.org n1 actions if you dont have much to go on.

    the moment the day becun you fosed me first on biassed reasoning. when nocitz confirmed me you laied off. i bet if i contiuned you would of contiuned to go on me using your biassed reason
    LOL no one confirmed you man.
    If you were SK, you could have just as easily said the same line and faked Survivor. You said the SK cleared you? Seriously, come on man. You weren't confirmed non-SK at all. I backed off of you because you finally claimed a role, and there was no reason to be trying to force a lynch on you anymore.

  33. ISO #233

  34. ISO #234

  35. ISO #235

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    No man, you changed the subject, not me! Executioner's targets are always town in FMs, even if they don't specify that they are. It is known that it would throw off the balance if the Exec was targeting a scum.. But we're not talking about Executioner's targets, we're still talking about handing out rolecard lolol The 2 situations are completely independant.

    And me agreeing with Bunny isn't because she's my wife. Even if someone like Slaol said that, I would've agreed. You don't agree that randomly assigning roles gives a larger variety to players? :o I think it would.. I think randoming roles is a lot fairer to all players, rather than giving your friends the good roles.
    pffff if you remember from anohter thread (that i wont mention becasue it got removed) you always side with bunny. and yes you change the subject i was pointing it out. it seems like every time we get into a game you use biassed reasong to point me as scum or something dumb. i bet bunny would do the same. i bet if you were sk you would of shot me first, you always make first assumptions based of biassed reasoning.

    randoming can be biassed as well. if someone does random and sees that one person gets a bad role they can go "let me redo it" and contiune to do it. if the host is freind with everyone in the game there can the host creat bias? if a game was full of new players can the host creat bias?

    @bunny lolz all you can do is agree with crypt.

  36. ISO #236

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    pffff if you remember from anohter thread (that i wont mention becasue it got removed) you always side with bunny. and yes you change the subject i was pointing it out. it seems like every time we get into a game you use biassed reasong to point me as scum or something dumb. i bet bunny would do the same. i bet if you were sk you would of shot me first, you always make first assumptions based of biassed reasoning.

    randoming can be biassed as well. if someone does random and sees that one person gets a bad role they can go "let me redo it" and contiune to do it. if the host is freind with everyone in the game there can the host creat bias? if a game was full of new players can the host creat bias?

    @bunny lolz all you can do is agree with crypt.
    ad hominem.

    I pointed you out as possible SK because I know you don't like Bunny, as seen by the way you treat her in discussions like this! lol that's why I firstly accused you of being SK. I wasn't like 'OMG IKA IS 100% SK, WE HAVE TO LYNCH HIM'. No, I only did it because I had no other lead and wanted a roleclaim out of you.

    Q:if the host is freind with everyone in the game there can the host creat bias?
    A: Yes, because you will like some people more than others if you know them all, no matter what.

    Q:if a game was full of new players can the host creat bias?
    A: No, because you have no relationship with any of the players, therefore there wouldn't be bias. But, if it was a game of 100% new players, i'm 100% sure you'd random. What would be the point of wasting time selecting roles for people based on nothing? I don't get it.


    And no, I actually pick my nightly kill targets intelligently. I try to target a person that no one would suspect me to be the killer of.

    Also ika, I deleted that last topic because it was getting out of hand and the argument was becoming circular.
    All I did was disagree with you (I said randoming is better than hand picking roles), and you started arguing with me about it.

    I'm not trying to argue with you. I understand your points. But there is no reason to take this so personally.
    Last edited by Cryptonic; May 13th, 2013 at 10:34 AM.

  37. ISO #237

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by ika View Post
    pffff if you remember from anohter thread (that i wont mention becasue it got removed) you always side with bunny. and yes you change the subject i was pointing it out. it seems like every time we get into a game you use biassed reasong to point me as scum or something dumb. i bet bunny would do the same. i bet if you were sk you would of shot me first, you always make first assumptions based of biassed reasoning.

    randoming can be biassed as well. if someone does random and sees that one person gets a bad role they can go "let me redo it" and contiune to do it. if the host is freind with everyone in the game there can the host creat bias? if a game was full of new players can the host creat bias?

    @bunny lolz all you can do is agree with crypt.
    lol i disagree with crypt on a million things a day. your points are bad, thats why we don't agree with you and agree with eachother. It is better to random to avoid host meta, keep it fair and to get a variety of roles in. This is easy stuff, plz try and keep up.

    anyways POD: i'd love to play again so I hope you rehost!=] =]
    Last edited by Bunny; May 13th, 2013 at 10:40 AM.

    i<3cryptonic

  38. ISO #238

  39. ISO #239

  40. ISO #240

  41. ISO #241

  42. ISO #242

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    No man, you changed the subject, not me! Executioner's targets are always town in FMs, even if they don't specify that they are. It is known that it would throw off the balance if the Exec was targeting a scum..
    Nope! I ran a game with 2 execs where one had a mafia target and the other had the other exec as his target. And the mafia still won because the 3 doctors didn't believe each other!
    [FMVI: Angel FMVIII: Gunsmith FMIX: Peasant FMX: Blacksmith
    MFM-I: Serial Killer MFM-II: Citizen MFM-III: Detective MFM-IV: Godfather/Witch MFM-V: Emperor MFM-VI:Host
    SFM-I: Spy SFM-II: Bandit SFM-III: Host SFM-VI: Skeleton Knight
    Awards: MFM-IV MVP SFM-VI MVP]

  43. ISO #243

  44. ISO #244

    Re: S-FM 83 Double Killers

    Quote Originally Posted by BorkBot View Post
    Nope! I ran a game with 2 execs where one had a mafia target and the other had the other exec as his target. And the mafia still won because the 3 doctors didn't believe each other!
    2 executioners is an exception

    Quote Originally Posted by Slaol View Post
    In my M-FM the Exec targeted a Joker.
    how long did he live for?

  45. ISO #245

  46. ISO #246

  47. ISO #247

  48. ISO #248

  49. ISO #249

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. S-FM 87 : Double Killers Too
    By powerofdeath in forum Archived S-FMs
    Replies: 255
    Last Post: June 16th, 2013, 06:26 AM
  2. S-FM : Double Killers Too
    By powerofdeath in forum Closed Signups (S-FM)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: June 11th, 2013, 06:23 AM
  3. S-FM Double Killers Too
    By powerofdeath in forum Setup Workshop
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: June 7th, 2013, 08:25 PM
  4. S-FM Double Killers
    By powerofdeath in forum Setup Workshop
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: May 14th, 2013, 07:35 AM
  5. S-FM Double Killers
    By powerofdeath in forum Closed Signups (S-FM)
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: May 10th, 2013, 03:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •