Day 4: Traffic Cops needed. - Page 4
Register

User Tag List

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 200 of 499
  1. ISO #151

  2. ISO #152

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Cookie Monster - How can it be, that when town has a hunch/lead whatever on somebody you immediately start finding another scapegoat? That's indirectly defending suspects/scum, which in turn, make you look way scummier
    Sherlock - Scum, i don't think i need to go into detail about how many scumtells and scumslips he makes with every second post
    hungry/animal - i was suspicious of them since day 2, their behavior is extremely unbeneficial to town
    jack/cluseau - Once, they were suspected. Following that, the suspicions started dying down for a reason, that til now remains a mystery to me. They both have their ups and downs when contributing to scumhunting, but they occasionally try to rolefish, make bad claims, even more ridiculous claims and simply OMGUS everybody while trying to maintain a low profile.

  3. ISO #153

  4. ISO #154

  5. ISO #155

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Hey, I'm here!

    Sorry for the blatant lurkyness during D3 and this one so far. I ended up being way busier than I should've been.

    Also, I'll be fully supporting lynches instead of jailings from now on. What I was afraid would happen (and mentionned a few times) happened; our Jailor cannot pick good targets.

  6. ISO #156

  7. ISO #157

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hamburglar View Post
    Cookie Monster - How can it be, that when town has a hunch/lead whatever on somebody you immediately start finding another scapegoat? That's indirectly defending suspects/scum, which in turn, make you look way scummier
    Sherlock - Scum, i don't think i need to go into detail about how many scumtells and scumslips he makes with every second post
    hungry/animal - i was suspicious of them since day 2, their behavior is extremely unbeneficial to town
    jack/cluseau - Once, they were suspected. Following that, the suspicions started dying down for a reason, that til now remains a mystery to me. They both have their ups and downs when contributing to scumhunting, but they occasionally try to rolefish, make bad claims, even more ridiculous claims and simply OMGUS everybody while trying to maintain a low profile.
    did hamburglar get replaced again?

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Jack Sparrow View Post
    How can you even put me and FM Cluseau together? That's retarded.

    where exactly did i rolefish or claim any role? Wut? I surely don't try to have a low profile.

    But nice try. Sigh
    completely agree with Jack on this one.

  8. ISO #158

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hamburglar View Post
    Cookie Monster - How can it be, that when town has a hunch/lead whatever on somebody you immediately start finding another scapegoat? That's indirectly defending suspects/scum, which in turn, make you look way scummier
    Sherlock - Scum, i don't think i need to go into detail about how many scumtells and scumslips he makes with every second post
    hungry/animal - i was suspicious of them since day 2, their behavior is extremely unbeneficial to town
    jack/cluseau - Once, they were suspected. Following that, the suspicions started dying down for a reason, that til now remains a mystery to me. They both have their ups and downs when contributing to scumhunting, but they occasionally try to rolefish, make bad claims, even more ridiculous claims and simply OMGUS everybody while trying to maintain a low profile.
    Your behavior is unbeneficial to town. I personally think that we should focus on the lurkers rather then the active players. Rubber ducky or Dracula for example, they haven't given uss any useful info at all.
    -vote Fm Dracula

  9. ISO #159

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hamburglar View Post
    Hey guys, replacement here.
    For todays discussion, i suggest we take a closer look at the people who could have hammred Pinkie Pie yesterday, but refused to do so.
    Basically lurkers are people that commented but failed to vote in the end. I will read the last pages of day 3 again to get an overview on that. Stay tuned.
    Yes, he was replaced.

  10. ISO #160

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Sherlock View Post
    Why you you think that jailing Pinkie Pie was bad?

    Well, if you were a Jailor, then who would be your target for the next night?
    Jailing pinkie pie was bad becouse he would have been shot by the vigilante. If the jailor jails our prime suspects it completely eliminates our reason to not lynch and let the jailor jail.

  11. ISO #161

  12. ISO #162

  13. ISO #163

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hungry View Post
    Your behavior is unbeneficial to town. I personally think that we should focus on the lurkers rather then the active players. Rubber ducky or Dracula for example, they haven't given uss any useful info at all.
    -vote Fm Dracula
    hasn't it been said that because the lurkers are dying, that the mafia is among the active speakers? so going after lurkers doesn't help us much.
    (yes i realize this is a turnaround to what i've said before, but its making more sense to me)

  14. ISO #164

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Anubis View Post
    hasn't it been said that because the lurkers are dying, that the mafia is among the active speakers? so going after lurkers doesn't help us much.
    (yes i realize this is a turnaround to what i've said before, but its making more sense to me)
    Some scums are probably active and some scums are probably lurkers. we have more active players then lurkers so finding scums among the lurkers is easier.

  15. ISO #165

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Sherlock View Post
    Why you you think that jailing Pinkie Pie was bad?

    Well, if you were a Jailor, then who would be your target for the next night?
    Because, obviously, not lynching Pinkie Pie was to let the Jailor jail someone, while the Vigilante would shoot him/her.
    Jailor should've jailed another of our suspects to have a nice and polite discussion with him, and an execute if need be.

    And if I had to jail someone, It would be, again, one of the people that have been suspected the most. Not going to give out names here, as we aren't even close to the end of the day.
    It would definitely not be the one person with the most votes. This one should be left to the Vigilante.

  16. ISO #166

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Wile E Coyote View Post
    Because, obviously, not lynching Pinkie Pie was to let the Jailor jail someone, while the Vigilante would shoot him/her.
    Jailor should've jailed another of our suspects to have a nice and polite discussion with him, and an execute if need be.

    And if I had to jail someone, It would be, again, one of the people that have been suspected the most. Not going to give out names here, as we aren't even close to the end of the day.
    It would definitely not be the one person with the most votes. This one should be left to the Vigilante.
    you think hungry should be left to vigilante? i can second this.

  17. ISO #167

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Anubis View Post
    you think hungry should be left to vigilante? i can second this.
    Don't misunderstand me there.
    As far as I know, we're only pressuring Hungry for now. Sure, if we don't decide on anyone else and noone finds anyone else, then yes.
    But we're still very early in the day and we'll have to wait and see what the others have to say.

  18. ISO #168

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Your reason for pressuring me is silly. jacks reason for starting a vote on me is becouse he thinks im a serial killer and that i was blocked by master chef. But if i was the serial killer and blocked by master chef then how did he get killed by a serial killer? I don't understand why everyone follows jack like sheeps, his not exacly a confirmed townie.

  19. ISO #169

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Not to be someone who is against the town on this one, but quite frankly the reasoning behind lynching Hungry is shaky at best.

    Call me an inept FM player who needs to stop playing, but because Master Chef called him a Bitch, he was the serial killer? What the fuck? That is terrible evidence.

    -vote FM Sherlock

    This doesn't need any more explanation. Why is this player still alive?

  20. ISO #170

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Indiana Jones View Post
    Not to be someone who is against the town on this one, but quite frankly the reasoning behind lynching Hungry is shaky at best.

    Call me an inept FM player who needs to stop playing, but because Master Chef called him a Bitch, he was the serial killer? What the fuck? That is terrible evidence.

    -vote FM Sherlock

    This doesn't need any more explanation. Why is this player still alive?
    At least you are a confirmed townie.
    -vote Fm Sherlock


    Our jailor seems to be incompetent, letting him jail is probably just a waste of time.

  21. ISO #171

  22. ISO #172

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Sherlock is my FoS for scum right now.

    On day one:
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Sherlock View Post
    Yosemite Sam, do you realize that you would be controlled by the witch afterwards if he really flips mafia?
    I guess that you really have accepted the risks if you decided to claim youself.
    We estblished this point already but I'd like to bring it up again. This post by itself may have just been a bad choice of words that people jumped on.

    On day two:
    He starts to get trained on, defends himself a little bit until the sheriff claims that Gandalf is mafia. Then disappears once the pressure is off of him.

    On day three:
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Sherlock View Post
    Good call, Sam. I always thought that there was something fishy with Pinkie. With his current behavior, I'm fairly sure that Pinkie was not framed.

    -vote Pinkie Pie
    Good job not actually voting for FM Pinkie Pie, the mafioso. Good job not fixing your mistake.

    On day four:
    Paranoid overposting.

    -vote FM Sherlock

  23. ISO #173

  24. ISO #174

  25. ISO #175

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Agahnim View Post
    Its funny that Cookie Monster brings that up cause I could say the same thing about Frog and Jack and Yosemite Sam and Indiana Jones.
    I disagree. Sam and myself are a lot more confirmed than you or Frog. Please don't get that mixed up.
    I do have a town read on you! xD

  26. ISO #176

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Indiana Jones View Post
    I disagree. Sam and myself are a lot more confirmed than you or Frog. Please don't get that mixed up.
    I do have a town read on you! xD
    You are retarded in this post.

    I was talking about the fact that ALL OF YOU ARE STILL ALIVE ON D4 INSTEAD OF BEING KILLED AS YOU ARE SO "CONFIRMED"! (Confirmed is in quotations due to the inclusion of Jack and Frog)

  27. ISO #177

  28. ISO #178

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Seeing how the jailor failed us, and how unbeneficial jailing in this setup is, i'd rather have a lynch on hungry and a shot on anybody the vigi suspects.
    I still don't know why sherlock hasn't been shot
    Reasons why jailor is more or less useless in this setup:
    What kind of info can he get for us? None.
    What will scum claim in jail? Most likely citizen, there are a dozens of those.
    We get immediate info after the lynch, which is a million times better than having the jailor die at the end of the night.
    The jailor can't communicate info with LWs, other than that he'd have to reveal himself. Do we want the jailor to reveal himself? No.
    The jailor could communicate using code, but there don't seem to be any codelike posts floating around.

    I think we should lynch 1 suspect and have the vigi shoot whoever he believes to be the most scummiest.

    My personal votes for the day are Sherlock/Hungry

  29. ISO #179

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hamburglar View Post
    Seeing how the jailor failed us, and how unbeneficial jailing in this setup is, i'd rather have a lynch on hungry and a shot on anybody the vigi suspects.
    I still don't know why sherlock hasn't been shot
    Reasons why jailor is more or less useless in this setup:
    What kind of info can he get for us? None.
    What will scum claim in jail? Most likely citizen, there are a dozens of those.
    We get immediate info after the lynch, which is a million times better than having the jailor die at the end of the night.
    The jailor can't communicate info with LWs, other than that he'd have to reveal himself. Do we want the jailor to reveal himself? No.
    The jailor could communicate using code, but there don't seem to be any codelike posts floating around.

    I think we should lynch 1 suspect and have the vigi shoot whoever he believes to be the most scummiest.

    My personal votes for the day are Sherlock/Hungry

    J BN UIF KBMJPS!

  30. ISO #180

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Agahnim View Post
    You are retarded in this post.

    I was talking about the fact that ALL OF YOU ARE STILL ALIVE ON D4 INSTEAD OF BEING KILLED AS YOU ARE SO "CONFIRMED"! (Confirmed is in quotations due to the inclusion of Jack and Frog)
    Why take a chance with someone who is probably going to be healed, when instead kill off the unknown probable citizens?

    One of the sheriffs do not need to be attacked, since the witch has him, and there are still 2 doctors. Better to kill the people who will not be healed.

    That is why we all still alive.

  31. ISO #181

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Indiana Jones View Post
    Why take a chance with someone who is probably going to be healed, when instead kill off the unknown probable citizens?

    One of the sheriffs do not need to be attacked, since the witch has him, and there are still 2 doctors. Better to kill the people who will not be healed.

    That is why we all still alive.
    You are ignoring the point my friend.

    My point is Cookie Monster just grasped at straws trying to mislynch me.

  32. ISO #182

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hamburglar View Post
    Seeing how the jailor failed us, and how unbeneficial jailing in this setup is, i'd rather have a lynch on hungry and a shot on anybody the vigi suspects.
    I still don't know why sherlock hasn't been shot
    Reasons why jailor is more or less useless in this setup:
    What kind of info can he get for us? None.
    What will scum claim in jail? Most likely citizen, there are a dozens of those.
    We get immediate info after the lynch, which is a million times better than having the jailor die at the end of the night.
    The jailor can't communicate info with LWs, other than that he'd have to reveal himself. Do we want the jailor to reveal himself? No.
    The jailor could communicate using code, but there don't seem to be any codelike posts floating around.

    I think we should lynch 1 suspect and have the vigi shoot whoever he believes to be the most scummiest.

    My personal votes for the day are Sherlock/Hungry
    Could you please tell uss why you think im a scum? it allmost sounds like you are trying to take attention away from sherlock.

  33. ISO #183

  34. ISO #184

  35. ISO #185

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    So you are starting this train again. Isn't it more simple to jail one of us and have vigilante shoot another?

    I'm going to be away for 10 hours, but i'll tell you one thing: Don't do anything rash until I return. And one more thing:
    The black sheep beats down the wolves.


    You try to find out what that means.

  36. ISO #186

  37. ISO #187

  38. ISO #188

  39. ISO #189

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Agahnim View Post
    Its funny that Cookie Monster brings that up cause I could say the same thing about Frog and Jack and Yosemite Sam and Indiana Jones.
    Yosemite and Indiana probably have a doctor, scum won't risk it.

    Frog and Jack are nowwheRe near as"thought to be town" than you.

    Also mis-reaction much? Cough post 176 cough.


    I don't know how I feel about this sherlock lynch, I'm getting town motivation from his posts. But I'll train with you guys
    -vote FM Sherlock


    @Jack yes I forgot to include ceasar, though I've already said why I suspect him D3

  40. ISO #190

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Cookie Monster View Post
    Yosemite and Indiana probably have a doctor, scum won't risk it.

    Frog and Jack are nowwheRe near as"thought to be town" than you.

    Also mis-reaction much? Cough post 176 cough.


    I don't know how I feel about this sherlock lynch, I'm getting town motivation from his posts. But I'll train with you guys
    -vote FM Sherlock


    @Jack yes I forgot to include ceasar, though I've already said why I suspect him D3
    Does it matter?
    They have done just about the exact same as I have and yet you focus only on me.
    You say you get a town feeling from Sherlock but you vote him?


  41. ISO #191

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Sherlock has been scummy as hell during the game, and I am still puzzled why no one has shot him. However, I do not think that he is SK, so it does not matter that much if we kill him today or during the night. Therefore, I favour leaving him to the Vigilante. However, Hungry has a strong chance of being the SK. Lynching the SK during the day prevents him from killing before death, so he should be lynch priority.

  42. ISO #192

  43. ISO #193

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Agahnim View Post
    You are ignoring the point my friend.

    My point is Cookie Monster just grasped at straws trying to mislynch me.
    Truly? He didst write a scum read on you, but nowhere hath I seen him attempting to push for thine lynch. Tis probably him thinking that at least one of the more vocal attendees of this meeting must be a corrupt smooth talker. As unfortunate as that is, I shalt confess that my mind is troubled with similar thoughts, although I am not yet certain who the traitor might be. Why, if may be so bold to ask, art thou so certain that Frog is to be trusted?

  44. ISO #194

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Ceasar View Post
    Sherlock has been scummy as hell during the game, and I am still puzzled why no one has shot him. However, I do not think that he is SK, so it does not matter that much if we kill him today or during the night. Therefore, I favour leaving him to the Vigilante. However, Hungry has a strong chance of being the SK. Lynching the SK during the day prevents him from killing before death, so he should be lynch priority.
    What makes you think im the SK? it only looks like you are trying to take away attention from sherlock.

  45. ISO #195

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Jack Sparrow View Post
    day 3 1. post in the whole day chat from Master chef the ugly Escort.

    what was that you said about me yesterday, hungry? i wouldn't vote watson because i'm his mafia buddy?

    what?
    bitch?
    ------------

    Summary: claims he roleblocked Hungry last night. No sk kill



    ----------------------
    Day 4 Hungry writes this.

    Master chef left alot of secret messages, will probably take a while to find them all.


    Summary: implies he saw his post and thats why he stabbed him

    ---------

    Hungry's posts are one liners pro town looking. Scum behaviour. Interesting is that he has better town reads than most of all people around. Thats easy if you are scum yourself and you attacked a mafia and you can see who is working together. Makes it so much more easy to see the real town guys.

    Hungry SK = 90%


    -vote FM Hungry
    this is why

  46. ISO #196

  47. ISO #197

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM King Arthur View Post
    Truly? He didst write a scum read on you, but nowhere hath I seen him attempting to push for thine lynch. Tis probably him thinking that at least one of the more vocal attendees of this meeting must be a corrupt smooth talker. As unfortunate as that is, I shalt confess that my mind is troubled with similar thoughts, although I am not yet certain who the traitor might be. Why, if may be so bold to ask, art thou so certain that Frog is to be trusted?
    He is laying the foundation (scum view of him is what im reading) of which to sow distrust and get me mislynched. It's in its infancy right now but if cookie Monster is scum it'll be coming.

    Frog has been a general intelligent player who has provided reads that have, thus far, only benefited town.
    At least to me it is as that

  48. ISO #198

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    About Sherlock, I have mixed feelings. At first I thought he couldst be the witch, but all in all I get a stumbling town impression from him. I doth believe that he hath been WIFOMing a PR quite some time now and he hath done so in such a way that I wouldst not expect it from evil. But then again, some of his messages art conflicting and he hath been read by others as possible scum enough not to be at risk of being killed by evil.

    Behold.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Sherlock
    Looks like we aren't even needed to participate and vote for now.

    Seriously, as the game's flow is now decided by Jailor, Vigilante, and other Town Power roles, we Citizens are not of much use now. We have our power in votes, but it seems that the real power of the votes is not going to be used for anything other than pressure.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is one of the reasons why I'm not active that much.
    This here statement doth seem like a complaint about reliance on PRs and he doth halfway imply being a citizen, yet he hath been constantly cheering on the use of the gaoler. And sometime on the second or first day, I doth not remember, I think he claimeth being a role that was difficult to prove. Not impossible, but difficult.

    In another post he made yesterday, he wert asking what shouldst be done with Pinkie Pie, as if searching confirmation.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Sherlock
    So how we are going to kill Pinkie Pie?

    Day lynch, execution in jail, shooting by vigilante or shooting by the guy with blacksmith gun?
    Incidentally, Hungry didst post a fishy reply to that.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM Hungry
    we should definitely let the jailor jail tonight, anyone that disagrees with this is probably a scum.
    Its possible that our escort has found the serial killer and if we let the jailor jail we will have a 2nd roleblocker aswell.
    He sayeth that the gaoler shouldst gaol, but didst that fully answer Sherlock's question?
    Nay. He posts something that didst suggest an answer, but that's just as easily withdrawn like so.

    "Oh, but I did not mean he should jail Pinke Pie! Don't be silly!"

    Which is exactly what his stance seemeth to be today. Like I sayeth to Pinkie Pie yesterday, failing to post with elaborate explanation is an easy method for scum to get back on what they said previously.

    In another possibly suspicious post by Hungry, albeit in the same league as a post made earlier by Jack, Hungry comments someone shouldst shoot Master Chef. Is it possible that Hungry hath been attacked by the serial killer, and their consigliere found out what Chef's role was?

    In that light, Agahnim's gaoler target list is suspicious too.

    Jailor: Pinkie Pie, Gimli, Joker, Prince Thrakan(?)

    Vigilante: Any of the trolly lurking useless 1-2 posters
    Didst not include Master Chef after I gave fairly good reasons for the gaoler to have a chat with him, not kill him. Twould have saved his life, too. And he could have given the gaoler his missing roleblock targets and made a code. But that be aftertalk.

    His entire gaoler target list were good vigilante targets. Wert he, as a trusted townsperson, looking to cause the failure that befell us last night, by chance? Was the murder of our local whore orchestrated? I cannot say for certain, but tis an interesting theory if I may say so myself!


    Before I do sidetrack further, this all (in addition to former finds and a feeling in my gut) doth lead me to support the pressure vote against Hungry rather than Sherlock. And my trust in Agahnim has waned a wee bit too, though his shooting was good and proper, as was his questioning to get reads out in the open... So he gets the benefit of doubt for now, same as Frog with his hypothesis plan (which is, in my eyes, his main redeeming quality. He hath not done overly much to serve the town after that).

    -vote FM Hungry


    Yes I didst move on from Sherlock to Hungry in one post and thou canst call it diversion all thou wanteth, but twas a natural turn of events while I was sorting through Sherlock's posts and the responses he received. He hath been WIFOMing gaoler for a long time and that be a rather stupid thing to do if he were truly evil, thus it required further investigation.

    Oh and I am PR hunting too! The nerve! Thing is, with the people behind Sherlock's train tis likely that he wouldst indeed get offed by the town if none brought up his WIFOM. If he art truly a gaoler, he canst prove himself because the gaoler messed up last night and thus he hath no defense. If he art a simple citizen, I'd still not say good riddance as I would with Frankenstein or Prince Trakhath.

    The King doth not care if thou seest mine actions as signs of trickery, for the blind doth see what they want to see regardless. The King is wise, and the wise do listen to him as he listened to Merlin's wise counsel. That is all that matters.

  49. ISO #199

  50. ISO #200

    Re: Day 4: Traffic Cops needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by FM King Arthur View Post
    About Sherlock, I have mixed feelings. At first I thought he couldst be the witch, but all in all I get a stumbling town impression from him. I doth believe that he hath been WIFOMing a PR quite some time now and he hath done so in such a way that I wouldst not expect it from evil. But then again, some of his messages art conflicting and he hath been read by others as possible scum enough not to be at risk of being killed by evil.

    Behold.


    This here statement doth seem like a complaint about reliance on PRs and he doth halfway imply being a citizen, yet he hath been constantly cheering on the use of the gaoler. And sometime on the second or first day, I doth not remember, I think he claimeth being a role that was difficult to prove. Not impossible, but difficult.

    In another post he made yesterday, he wert asking what shouldst be done with Pinkie Pie, as if searching confirmation.



    Incidentally, Hungry didst post a fishy reply to that.


    He sayeth that the gaoler shouldst gaol, but didst that fully answer Sherlock's question?
    Nay. He posts something that didst suggest an answer, but that's just as easily withdrawn like so.

    "Oh, but I did not mean he should jail Pinke Pie! Don't be silly!"

    Which is exactly what his stance seemeth to be today. Like I sayeth to Pinkie Pie yesterday, failing to post with elaborate explanation is an easy method for scum to get back on what they said previously.

    In another possibly suspicious post by Hungry, albeit in the same league as a post made earlier by Jack, Hungry comments someone shouldst shoot Master Chef. Is it possible that Hungry hath been attacked by the serial killer, and their consigliere found out what Chef's role was?

    In that light, Agahnim's gaoler target list is suspicious too.



    Didst not include Master Chef after I gave fairly good reasons for the gaoler to have a chat with him, not kill him. Twould have saved his life, too. And he could have given the gaoler his missing roleblock targets and made a code. But that be aftertalk.

    His entire gaoler target list were good vigilante targets. Wert he, as a trusted townsperson, looking to cause the failure that befell us last night, by chance? Was the murder of our local whore orchestrated? I cannot say for certain, but tis an interesting theory if I may say so myself!


    Before I do sidetrack further, this all (in addition to former finds and a feeling in my gut) doth lead me to support the pressure vote against Hungry rather than Sherlock. And my trust in Agahnim has waned a wee bit too, though his shooting was good and proper, as was his questioning to get reads out in the open... So he gets the benefit of doubt for now, same as Frog with his hypothesis plan (which is, in my eyes, his main redeeming quality. He hath not done overly much to serve the town after that).

    -vote FM Hungry


    Yes I didst move on from Sherlock to Hungry in one post and thou canst call it diversion all thou wanteth, but twas a natural turn of events while I was sorting through Sherlock's posts and the responses he received. He hath been WIFOMing gaoler for a long time and that be a rather stupid thing to do if he were truly evil, thus it required further investigation.

    Oh and I am PR hunting too! The nerve! Thing is, with the people behind Sherlock's train tis likely that he wouldst indeed get offed by the town if none brought up his WIFOM. If he art truly a gaoler, he canst prove himself because the gaoler messed up last night and thus he hath no defense. If he art a simple citizen, I'd still not say good riddance as I would with Frankenstein or Prince Trakhath.

    The King doth not care if thou seest mine actions as signs of trickery, for the blind doth see what they want to see regardless. The King is wise, and the wise do listen to him as he listened to Merlin's wise counsel. That is all that matters.
    You put alot of effort into saving your scum buddy, have you forgotten that you wanted to lynch Master chef yesterday? Dont make me laugh

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. A BUG NEEDED TO BE FIX NAO
    By Jim in forum General Archive
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: October 28th, 2012, 04:33 AM
  2. advice needed please.
    By Bunny in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: September 19th, 2012, 04:20 PM
  3. Explanation needed
    By Tarkus in forum Mafia Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 31st, 2012, 08:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •