Things that make your "debate" skills suck.

[Raptorblaze]

1. Claiming evidence you have no way of possessing.
2. Using a logical fallacy
3. Attacking the way someone types an argument instead of the substance of the argument itself
4. Personal insults
5. Baiting someone into an insult fest
6. Claiming any stance or evidence which refutes your position as "unfair" Claiming anything is unfair.

Any more or criticisms of these? Let's discuss the art of debates!

[Spy]

Bad grammar.

[Lazers]

I think all of those can be considered fallacies

But other than that, just poor grasp of the english language

[Ash]

1. Claiming evidence you have no way of possessing.
2. Using a logical fallacy
3. Attacking the way someone types an argument instead of the substance of the argument itself
4. Personal insults
5. Baiting someone into an insult fest
6. Claiming any stance or evidence which refutes your position as "unfair" Claiming anything is unfair.

Any more or criticisms of these? Let's discuss the art of debates!

I disagree because
FUCK YOU

gg i win

[Archangel]

any1 play the sc2 custom game debates. that stuff was better than mafia sometimes back then

[Dmpk]

1. Claiming evidence you have no way of possessing.
2. Using a logical fallacy
3. Attacking the way someone types an argument instead of the substance of the argument itself
4. Personal insults
5. Baiting someone into an insult fest
6. Claiming any stance or evidence which refutes your position as "unfair" Claiming anything is unfair.

Any more or criticisms of these? Let's discuss the art of debates!

Not providing evidence upon request.
Racism cannot be a factor.
Off topic banter or rumor doesn't matter unless there is proven relevance pertaining to the specified conversation.
The inability to control the emotional side of your brain with the logical side.
Less than 130 IQ is problematic in this situation as well.

'Bout all I can think of atm.