Votekick Option

[SinisteRing]

I think we should be allowed the option to votekick a real-named player. The main reason I suggest this is because with 15 players, the game is bound to have at least one person who laggs miserably and brings the quality of the game down drastically. We should be allowed a 2/3 vote (including the votes of dead players) to votekick a real-named person, not their alias in-game.

[NorthStar]

How about we have the a party of 6 ragekick a Mayor that just revealed himself and put the Godfather on the trial stand?

[SinisteRing]

How about we have the a party of 6 ragekick a Mayor that just revealed himself and put the Godfather on the trial stand?

You wouldn't know what the B.Net name of the player is, therefore that wouldn't work. It would only work to kick out laggers, nothing more, since nobody knows the B.Net name of the players who are playing.

[Celios641]

The only problem i see with that is trolls they will just kick anyone that isn't on skype with them

[SinisteRing]

The only problem i see with that is trolls they will just kick anyone that isn't on skype with them

It would require a majority of players to kick... not just a few. Therefore, it would be impossible unless more than half the game was made of people skyping... and in that case... why wouldn't they just make their own game?

[Ruffles]

instead of 2/3s, i say everyone. Everyone that's left in the game, of course.
Reason being is because if there's a lagger in the game, I am pretty sure everyone would want to kick him. If there are trolls/skypers like stated above, the vote kick option would be abused like no others.

[SinisteRing]

instead of 2/3s, i say everyone. Everyone that's left in the game, of course.
Reason being is because if there's a lagger in the game, I am pretty sure everyone would want to kick him. If there are trolls/skypers like stated above, the vote kick option would be abused like no others.

Yet that 1 person who's afk, 1 person who has never played the game, or 1 person who simply doesn't pay attention to what's going on is going to screw you over. I highly recommend at least allowing a fault of 1-3 players, depending on the size of the game.

[SinisteRing]

The lagg issues are becoming more of a problem day by day.

[Ruffles]

The lagg issues are becoming more of a problem day by day.

depends if you get lucky
i had a game where the loading screen took 4 seconds, and it wasn't even in house.

[SinisteRing]

I'd rather not sit there and hope for luck. I'd rather have the ability to take action when necessary.

[Pygalisk]

How about we get this option and have hosts constantly kicked for taking more than 5 seconds to get the setup ready by pubes?

[SinisteRing]

How about we get this option and have hosts constantly kicked for taking more than 5 seconds to get the setup ready by pubes?

They wouldn't be kicked - they'd be repicked with the current system. I seriously don't see why people are arguing with this suggestion, it's in many other games that are around and causes little to no problems.