[QUOTE=Mikecall;572179]Haha xD, this game was actually something that could of been real good if a ton of discussion came along, not saying there wasnt a lot, but there was a lot more potential.
Reminds me back to the game of cryptonics.[/QUOTE]
Which one? The one where you were mafiah with Bruno?
Originally Posted by Mikecall
Haha xD, this game was actually something that could of been real good if a ton of discussion came along, not saying there wasnt a lot, but there was a lot more potential.
Reminds me back to the game of cryptonics.
Which one? The one where you were mafiah with Bruno?
[QUOTE=Toadette;572164]Calix that was fun once it got rolling. Our argument was TvT the whole time - shows that tunneling is bad strategy and rethinking and rereading is the way to go. I had the assumption right, but the wrong person - the quiet guy was guilty not the vocal dame.
Second guessing works.[/QUOTE]
That push on me helped, heh. Once I was at risk of being mislynched, I come rolling in with shitty reads and had an entertaining argument with you.
One day, we will be unstoppable as Masons, lol
Originally Posted by Toadette
Calix that was fun once it got rolling. Our argument was TvT the whole time - shows that tunneling is bad strategy and rethinking and rereading is the way to go. I had the assumption right, but the wrong person - the quiet guy was guilty not the vocal dame.
Second guessing works.
That push on me helped, heh. Once I was at risk of being mislynched, I come rolling in with shitty reads and had an entertaining argument with you.
[QUOTE=Calix;572142]Your reaction is completely disproportionate to what has happened this game. There is no logical reason to have this freakout [I]when the game is almost over[/I].[/QUOTE]
[class=admin]Explain the emotional drama or GTFO[/class]
Originally Posted by Calix
Your reaction is completely disproportionate to what has happened this game. There is no logical reason to have this freakout when the game is almost over.
[QUOTE=RLVG;572137]Calix, stop making sense when I have explicitly named this : I've stopped giving a fuck. Don't make reads out of anything I've said, I'm just doing random adequate stuff.
If you want to make this a reason to vote me, go for it.[/QUOTE]
Your reaction is completely disproportionate to what has happened this game. There is no logical reason to have this freakout [I]when the game is almost over[/I].
Originally Posted by RLVG
Calix, stop making sense when I have explicitly named this : I've stopped giving a fuck. Don't make reads out of anything I've said, I'm just doing random adequate stuff.
If you want to make this a reason to vote me, go for it.
Your reaction is completely disproportionate to what has happened this game. There is no logical reason to have this freakout when the game is almost over.
[QUOTE=RLVG;572090]As for the unvoting of Mint, Ash would quickhammer and end the game with discussion being completely undone. Ash is that kind of troll player and would almost automatically get lynched the day after based on the quickhammer.
[COLOR="#FFFFFF"]This is where he implies that Ash is town, or at the very least not acting that way due to his alignment. I say this due to how he portrays Ash's 'auto lynch' as being a bad thing, which would only apply if Ash is town.[/COLOR]
The moment I saw Mint do a scumslip though, I voted him up. Toadette decided to hammer him a minute after.
[COLOR="#FFFFFF"]Blames Toadette for the lynch even though RLVG is the player who put Mintberry in that position in the first place.[/COLOR]
Another thing to take note of, the host had the night for 3min long. I was asleep at that time, did someone give an action after the flip and ask the game to continue? If that's the case... I don't think that makes Calix scum if we consider this and timezones.
[COLOR="#FFFFFF"]Terrible reasoning. Brendan was obviously going to die, why wouldn't the scum send the action during the day? I know I swore at the host, but POD isn't that retarded as to signal who the scum are via timezones.[/COLOR][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RLVG;572091]Actually. Ash. He's active at that time, and he was absent for a while during game starting up. What if he and Mint was both inactive, forcing the host to extend the Night 1 for them to do an action? Ash is too much of a troll player; he can vote town as town and not vote scum up, he can vote scum as scum and not vote town up so him quickhammering his own buddy would just be there for lolz or to gain towncred.
[vote]Ash[/vote]
I'm still fucking confused about that damn gun.
[COLOR="#FFFFFF"]Sudden switch to Ash, not because he thinks he is scum but because he is a 'troll player'.[/COLOR][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RLVG;572106]False dilema.
[vote]Toadette[/vote]
[COLOR="#FFFFFF"]That's not enough of a tell to warrant a vote. Why would scum put themselves in that position by not keeping their options open?[/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Those would be my thoughts.
I do not get how this game has been 'toxic' enough to warrant this melodrama when the game ends today.
Originally Posted by RLVG
As for the unvoting of Mint, Ash would quickhammer and end the game with discussion being completely undone. Ash is that kind of troll player and would almost automatically get lynched the day after based on the quickhammer.
This is where he implies that Ash is town, or at the very least not acting that way due to his alignment. I say this due to how he portrays Ash's 'auto lynch' as being a bad thing, which would only apply if Ash is town.
The moment I saw Mint do a scumslip though, I voted him up. Toadette decided to hammer him a minute after.
Blames Toadette for the lynch even though RLVG is the player who put Mintberry in that position in the first place.
Another thing to take note of, the host had the night for 3min long. I was asleep at that time, did someone give an action after the flip and ask the game to continue? If that's the case... I don't think that makes Calix scum if we consider this and timezones.
Terrible reasoning. Brendan was obviously going to die, why wouldn't the scum send the action during the day? I know I swore at the host, but POD isn't that retarded as to signal who the scum are via timezones.
Originally Posted by RLVG
Actually. Ash. He's active at that time, and he was absent for a while during game starting up. What if he and Mint was both inactive, forcing the host to extend the Night 1 for them to do an action? Ash is too much of a troll player; he can vote town as town and not vote scum up, he can vote scum as scum and not vote town up so him quickhammering his own buddy would just be there for lolz or to gain towncred.
-vote Ash
I'm still fucking confused about that damn gun.
Sudden switch to Ash, not because he thinks he is scum but because he is a 'troll player'.
Originally Posted by RLVG
False dilema.
-vote Toadette
That's not enough of a tell to warrant a vote. Why would scum put themselves in that position by not keeping their options open?
Those would be my thoughts.
I do not get how this game has been 'toxic' enough to warrant this melodrama when the game ends today.
Oh, I guess I have one thing that stands out to me.
Toadette has on several occasions implicitly defended Ash. Considering that they both cannot be scum, this can't be W/W buddying.
However, I can't recall a post where Toadette town-read Ash or gave a reason why he shouldn't be suspected or accused me of picking low-hanging fruit or wondered if he was AFK scum like Mintberry or anything like that. So why would she implicitly defend him that much, going as far as to chainsaw on me, if they aren't allies?
I'm aware that the person Toadette was trying to lynch was scum, but Toadette also has a reputation of bussing and I'd be an idiot to not even consider that option, so that is less of a town tell with her than it is with Ash.
Yes, this is an accusation of white knighting. I can't wrap my head around why anyone would act like that unless they knew Ash was town, because his actions from yesterday cannot be read in that way. The only thing that I have town-read across the entire game from him is his belligerence, of which isn't unusual for him.
So Toadette, if you could go into more detail about what you were thinking when you were doing that, it would be appreciated.
I'm going to educate myself now. Peace :superjack:
Oh, I guess I have one thing that stands out to me.
Toadette has on several occasions implicitly defended Ash. Considering that they both cannot be scum, this can't be W/W buddying.
However, I can't recall a post where Toadette town-read Ash or gave a reason why he shouldn't be suspected or accused me of picking low-hanging fruit or wondered if he was AFK scum like Mintberry or anything like that. So why would she implicitly defend him that much, going as far as to chainsaw on me, if they aren't allies?
I'm aware that the person Toadette was trying to lynch was scum, but Toadette also has a reputation of bussing and I'd be an idiot to not even consider that option, so that is less of a town tell with her than it is with Ash.
Yes, this is an accusation of white knighting. I can't wrap my head around why anyone would act like that unless they knew Ash was town, because his actions from yesterday cannot be read in that way. The only thing that I have town-read across the entire game from him is his belligerence, of which isn't unusual for him.
So Toadette, if you could go into more detail about what you were thinking when you were doing that, it would be appreciated.
[QUOTE=Calix;572081][insert rant about quick-hammering morons here]
But never mind that, I have multi-quotes!
[SPOILER=Toadette's posts up to #110]
[/SPOILER]
I haven't had the chance to go through them in depth but they seem pretty pro-town and reasonable to me. Prods players, shows initiative with making plans, states opinions without being prodded. Nothing that is out-there for day one but it seems like an improvement over last game she was scum.
You have Mintberry/ Jim asking them for a summary which is one of the few interactions Mintberry had with anyone, so I decided to note that. Toadette, what is your attitude towards summaries in general?
Mintberry also said he found RLVG going along with Toadette to be scummy, but never pushes for that train or maintains the FOS.
I'd like to add that if anyone thinks I'm scum, that implies that I picked SuperJack Night 1 with zero leads. Now I don't know who I would have picked as scum as I never had to think about it, but it certainly wouldn't be him :p[/QUOTE]
Those aren't ALL of Toadette's quotes, forgot to clarify. If I didn't include it, I felt it was null/ irrelevant. I'm not the player who labels posts as fluff, fluff, shitpost, fluff.
Originally Posted by Calix
[insert rant about quick-hammering morons here]
But never mind that, I have multi-quotes!
Spoiler : Toadette's posts up to #110 :
I haven't had the chance to go through them in depth but they seem pretty pro-town and reasonable to me. Prods players, shows initiative with making plans, states opinions without being prodded. Nothing that is out-there for day one but it seems like an improvement over last game she was scum.
You have Mintberry/ Jim asking them for a summary which is one of the few interactions Mintberry had with anyone, so I decided to note that. Toadette, what is your attitude towards summaries in general?
Mintberry also said he found RLVG going along with Toadette to be scummy, but never pushes for that train or maintains the FOS.
I'd like to add that if anyone thinks I'm scum, that implies that I picked SuperJack Night 1 with zero leads. Now I don't know who I would have picked as scum as I never had to think about it, but it certainly wouldn't be him
Those aren't ALL of Toadette's quotes, forgot to clarify. If I didn't include it, I felt it was null/ irrelevant. I'm not the player who labels posts as fluff, fluff, shitpost, fluff.
[SPOILER=Toadette's posts up to #110][QUOTE=Toadette;571002]Wtf? One minute I have one rolecard, the next I have a different one. Thanks Obama.[/QUOTE]
Which one of these players is likely to kill SJ night 1 after 0 crumbs, given his recent terrible lurker and shitpost play? Probably someone who hasn't played with him in a while.
Let's park a vote here for a minute.
[Vote]Brendan[/vote][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571015]You make a good point Calix
[QUOTE=Toadette;571022]I forgot to unvote lol. Fixed already
Considers... If Mafia got the gun the game could end day 1
Considering that its kinda MLYLO, I do think shooting the gun today is the best move because 3v2 LYLO is better odds of lynching a scum than 4v2 MLYLO, and if a scum is hit that quickly flips things in our favor.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571024]RLVG has to be on board with lynching day 1 though for it to happen[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571028]If we no lynch and mafia has the gun, its GG because they kill at night, and shoot first thing day 2. We can't no lynch for that reason.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571031]Consort exists to block cop, that's it[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571036]Would lol if SJ forgot to give a gun out[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571037]We have 72 hours
I don't think we'll need that long but assuming RLVGs plan works and dayflip from gunshot happens after the shot instead of at day end, gun should be shot by hour 48 at the latest I think, earlier if possible
Also yeah, pseudo votes only until then[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571040]I have an idea:
After the first 24 hours, whoever has the gun should anoumce they have it. Since they should be shooting it day 1 I see mo problem / downside to this.
They also need to announce who they are shooting for the sake of transparency. That way if they aren't revealed, they can't deny using the gun (if they are Mafia)
Then by hour 48 shoot, we use 3 votes to lynch instead of 4[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571047]Claiming gun does not mean claiming role, so claiming gun is the very pro town move to do. No downside to it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571050]We should narrow it down to two people really, have the gun owner shoot one, and then lynch the other.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571054]So what happened to Brendan? Your FOS went away that quickly?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571072]Hello. Thoughts on the game so far?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571077]Have you read through the short entirety of the game yet? Ehst do you think about SJ's death and the early FOS on you?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571081]RLVG put the FOS on you as well.
Who do you think would have killed SJ? I find it highly unlikely that Calix would sign off on that night 1.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571083]So yeah gun should be shot at hour 48 at the latest to give us 24 hours at least to pile up votes[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571084]Hello, thoughts so far?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571086]Thoughts on using the gun today?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571088]Anything else you want to add? Who should the two people to lynch and shoot be at the moment for you?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571092]SJ is dead lol[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571093]Reasons?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571098]Alright when you're ready to play we'll play[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jim;571099]Toadette can you give me a rundown of the events so far, i have glaucoma and shouldn't read pages on pages of text[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571100]Not much. Me, Calix, and RLVG have discussed the person who got the gun claiming they got it, and using it today, since its a 4v2 day and if mafia got the gun they can and the game day 2 whether we lynch today or not as long as they aren't lynched. If a town is shot it'll be 3v2, which LYLO is better than MLYLO.
General consensus is to shoot today by hour 48 at the latest, and lynch in the last 24 hours. We can shoot earlier obviously. RLVG cast an early FOS on Brendan, as did I, for potentially shooting SJ, (I voted and unvoted to avoid a 2 scum quickhammer situation) Brendan brushed my FOS off as being intimidated by a veteran player and addressed RLVGs by saying he should be lynched.
I don't remember Calix stating she's susp of anyone left. RLVG said me and you should die today[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571101]That was just off the top of my head. If I missed any facts feel free to correct me anyone
At the moment I'm still leaning shoot Brendan. Dunno about number 2 yet[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jim;571106]RLVG jumping with Toadette for what seems to be a joke then goes seriously seems scummy to me.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571110]I like it, let's see if there's a cc. Considering its MLYLO, a cop claim day 1 after being roleblocked is believable, but we'll see if there's a cc[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571114]Brendan claimed cop, and you haven't given any reason yet for ms to believe you are town. If you ignore my questions, then say "this person and that person are scum" and that's it, there's nothing to go off of.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571118]Thoughts on me vs Ash?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571143]I don't get how discrediting a cop claim by "that seems lucky" makes sense at all[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571152]I see no reason why to believe he isn't[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571210]Whoever got the gun. Claim already.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571219]I claim not having a gun.[/QUOTE][/SPOILER]
I haven't had the chance to go through them in depth but they seem pretty pro-town and reasonable to me. Prods players, shows initiative with making plans, states opinions without being prodded. Nothing that is out-there for day one but it seems like an improvement over last game she was scum.
You have Mintberry/ Jim asking them for a summary which is one of the few interactions Mintberry had with anyone, so I decided to note that. Toadette, what is your attitude towards summaries in general?
Mintberry also said he found RLVG going along with Toadette to be scummy, but never pushes for that train or maintains the FOS.
I'd like to add that if anyone thinks I'm scum, that implies that I picked SuperJack Night 1 with zero leads. Now I don't know who I would have picked as scum as I never had to think about it, but it certainly wouldn't be him :p
[insert rant about quick-hammering morons here]
But never mind that, I have multi-quotes!
Spoiler : Toadette's posts up to #110 :
Originally Posted by Toadette
Wtf? One minute I have one rolecard, the next I have a different one. Thanks Obama.
Which one of these players is likely to kill SJ night 1 after 0 crumbs, given his recent terrible lurker and shitpost play? Probably someone who hasn't played with him in a while.
Let's park a vote here for a minute.
-vote Brendan
Originally Posted by Toadette
You make a good point Calix
-placeholder vote Brendan
Originally Posted by Toadette
I forgot to unvote lol. Fixed already
Considers... If Mafia got the gun the game could end day 1
Considering that its kinda MLYLO, I do think shooting the gun today is the best move because 3v2 LYLO is better odds of lynching a scum than 4v2 MLYLO, and if a scum is hit that quickly flips things in our favor.
Originally Posted by Toadette
RLVG has to be on board with lynching day 1 though for it to happen
Originally Posted by Toadette
If we no lynch and mafia has the gun, its GG because they kill at night, and shoot first thing day 2. We can't no lynch for that reason.
Originally Posted by Toadette
Consort exists to block cop, that's it
Originally Posted by Toadette
Would lol if SJ forgot to give a gun out
Originally Posted by Toadette
We have 72 hours
I don't think we'll need that long but assuming RLVGs plan works and dayflip from gunshot happens after the shot instead of at day end, gun should be shot by hour 48 at the latest I think, earlier if possible
Also yeah, pseudo votes only until then
Originally Posted by Toadette
I have an idea:
After the first 24 hours, whoever has the gun should anoumce they have it. Since they should be shooting it day 1 I see mo problem / downside to this.
They also need to announce who they are shooting for the sake of transparency. That way if they aren't revealed, they can't deny using the gun (if they are Mafia)
Then by hour 48 shoot, we use 3 votes to lynch instead of 4
Originally Posted by Toadette
Claiming gun does not mean claiming role, so claiming gun is the very pro town move to do. No downside to it.
Originally Posted by Toadette
We should narrow it down to two people really, have the gun owner shoot one, and then lynch the other.
Originally Posted by Toadette
So what happened to Brendan? Your FOS went away that quickly?
Originally Posted by Toadette
Hello. Thoughts on the game so far?
Originally Posted by Toadette
Have you read through the short entirety of the game yet? Ehst do you think about SJ's death and the early FOS on you?
Originally Posted by Toadette
RLVG put the FOS on you as well.
Who do you think would have killed SJ? I find it highly unlikely that Calix would sign off on that night 1.
Originally Posted by Toadette
So yeah gun should be shot at hour 48 at the latest to give us 24 hours at least to pile up votes
Originally Posted by Toadette
Hello, thoughts so far?
Originally Posted by Toadette
Thoughts on using the gun today?
Originally Posted by Toadette
Anything else you want to add? Who should the two people to lynch and shoot be at the moment for you?
Originally Posted by Toadette
SJ is dead lol
Originally Posted by Toadette
Reasons?
Originally Posted by Toadette
Alright when you're ready to play we'll play
Originally Posted by Jim
Toadette can you give me a rundown of the events so far, i have glaucoma and shouldn't read pages on pages of text
Originally Posted by Toadette
Not much. Me, Calix, and RLVG have discussed the person who got the gun claiming they got it, and using it today, since its a 4v2 day and if mafia got the gun they can and the game day 2 whether we lynch today or not as long as they aren't lynched. If a town is shot it'll be 3v2, which LYLO is better than MLYLO.
General consensus is to shoot today by hour 48 at the latest, and lynch in the last 24 hours. We can shoot earlier obviously. RLVG cast an early FOS on Brendan, as did I, for potentially shooting SJ, (I voted and unvoted to avoid a 2 scum quickhammer situation) Brendan brushed my FOS off as being intimidated by a veteran player and addressed RLVGs by saying he should be lynched.
I don't remember Calix stating she's susp of anyone left. RLVG said me and you should die today
Originally Posted by Toadette
That was just off the top of my head. If I missed any facts feel free to correct me anyone
At the moment I'm still leaning shoot Brendan. Dunno about number 2 yet
Originally Posted by Jim
RLVG jumping with Toadette for what seems to be a joke then goes seriously seems scummy to me.
Originally Posted by Toadette
I like it, let's see if there's a cc. Considering its MLYLO, a cop claim day 1 after being roleblocked is believable, but we'll see if there's a cc
Originally Posted by Toadette
Brendan claimed cop, and you haven't given any reason yet for ms to believe you are town. If you ignore my questions, then say "this person and that person are scum" and that's it, there's nothing to go off of.
Originally Posted by Toadette
Thoughts on me vs Ash?
Originally Posted by Toadette
I don't get how discrediting a cop claim by "that seems lucky" makes sense at all
Originally Posted by Toadette
I see no reason why to believe he isn't
Originally Posted by Toadette
Whoever got the gun. Claim already.
Originally Posted by Toadette
I claim not having a gun.
I haven't had the chance to go through them in depth but they seem pretty pro-town and reasonable to me. Prods players, shows initiative with making plans, states opinions without being prodded. Nothing that is out-there for day one but it seems like an improvement over last game she was scum.
You have Mintberry/ Jim asking them for a summary which is one of the few interactions Mintberry had with anyone, so I decided to note that. Toadette, what is your attitude towards summaries in general?
Mintberry also said he found RLVG going along with Toadette to be scummy, but never pushes for that train or maintains the FOS.
I'd like to add that if anyone thinks I'm scum, that implies that I picked SuperJack Night 1 with zero leads. Now I don't know who I would have picked as scum as I never had to think about it, but it certainly wouldn't be him
[QUOTE=Toadette;572074]There is a small chance RLVG bussed Mint. Remember how he unvoted and refused to hammer after?
[Unvote][/UNVOTE]
I will afford you the time. I expect RLVG to vote you and then I can hammer you at day end, sure[/QUOTE]
How long do we have left, exactly? I can start going through your posts now since you are around to answer.
I am waiting for my lift to turn up so can't say exactly when I will disappear. Probably by the hour FYI
[QUOTE=Toadette;572075]Assuming I'm not convinced otherwise that is.[/QUOTE]
A) I'd rather avoid a retarded quick-hammer on a town as this site is prone to doing. It's no secret that I hate it when players AFK/ don't try when a 'lead' turns up, after all.
B) The game would be dull if nothing else happened today, especially as Sen's game doesn't start until later today.
[QUOTE=Toadette;572076]Also yeah In won't be voting Ash. So if you're going to make a case against Ash I won't listen.[/QUOTE]
We only have 400 posts, so I am inclined to showcase everyone's posts and review the important ones/ ask questions. I won't be trying hard with Ash as I've already said my piece on why I find his actions to be scummy. As noted earlier, that is largely mitigated by his choice of hammer.
We have nothing to lose by having the full picture of what everyone has said though.
Originally Posted by Toadette
There is a small chance RLVG bussed Mint. Remember how he unvoted and refused to hammer after?
-unvote
I will afford you the time. I expect RLVG to vote you and then I can hammer you at day end, sure
How long do we have left, exactly? I can start going through your posts now since you are around to answer.
I am waiting for my lift to turn up so can't say exactly when I will disappear. Probably by the hour FYI
Originally Posted by Toadette
Assuming I'm not convinced otherwise that is.
A) I'd rather avoid a retarded quick-hammer on a town as this site is prone to doing. It's no secret that I hate it when players AFK/ don't try when a 'lead' turns up, after all.
B) The game would be dull if nothing else happened today, especially as Sen's game doesn't start until later today.
Originally Posted by Toadette
Also yeah In won't be voting Ash. So if you're going to make a case against Ash I won't listen.
We only have 400 posts, so I am inclined to showcase everyone's posts and review the important ones/ ask questions. I won't be trying hard with Ash as I've already said my piece on why I find his actions to be scummy. As noted earlier, that is largely mitigated by his choice of hammer.
We have nothing to lose by having the full picture of what everyone has said though.
[QUOTE=Toadette;572071]No, I was scum in spore.[/QUOTE]
That's not why you rubbed my nose in the dust last time. If everyone else was AFK you'd be more obvious about it.
[QUOTE=Toadette;572072]I'm not ignoring you Calix but this looks very bad for you.[/QUOTE]
I'm aware that hardcore defending the scum looks terrible for me. I'd like to rant about how not even I am that shitty and obvious at being scum, but that's not a solid defense.
I didn't want to lynch an empty slot. I still would have lynched Ash over him yesterday had he not slipped hardcore. Speaking of that, either you bussed him hardcore (possible) or you are town and Ash/ RLVG are the scum.
May I request that you unvote? I have to go to school in an hour or so and I'd like to review the posts by you and RLVG when I get back. Someone definitely bussed him and I have the task of figuring out who >_>
Considering that you'll be around at EOD, this isn't part of some nefarious plan to No-Lynch (which would be the optimal move were it not for the potential of a gun), it's just to guarantee that RLVG won't hammer early.
Originally Posted by Toadette
No, I was scum in spore.
That's not why you rubbed my nose in the dust last time. If everyone else was AFK you'd be more obvious about it.
Originally Posted by Toadette
I'm not ignoring you Calix but this looks very bad for you.
I'm aware that hardcore defending the scum looks terrible for me. I'd like to rant about how not even I am that shitty and obvious at being scum, but that's not a solid defense.
I didn't want to lynch an empty slot. I still would have lynched Ash over him yesterday had he not slipped hardcore. Speaking of that, either you bussed him hardcore (possible) or you are town and Ash/ RLVG are the scum.
May I request that you unvote? I have to go to school in an hour or so and I'd like to review the posts by you and RLVG when I get back. Someone definitely bussed him and I have the task of figuring out who >_>
Considering that you'll be around at EOD, this isn't part of some nefarious plan to No-Lynch (which would be the optimal move were it not for the potential of a gun), it's just to guarantee that RLVG won't hammer early.
[QUOTE=Toadette;571948]Seems pretty straightforward. Calix refused to even consider mintberry, even after Mintberry showed up.
Ash tried to hammer. RLVG maybe a case could be made for, but it seems unlikely.
In a LYLO type situation, makes sense why Calix would go for bust with the mislynch.[/QUOTE]
Why would I bother when I could have just bussed, gained free town-cred and avoid being lynched the next day? I'm not the sort who goes for the conventional approaches as scum, as my recent games show.
[QUOTE=Toadette;571949]Also SJ giving Calix the gun is definitely in the realm of very probable, now that I think about it. He likes her a lot.[/QUOTE]
I don't have a gun. I don't think anyone does. Why wouldn't they have used it yesterday to reset the votes and save their ally?
Your last line makes no sense.
[QUOTE=Toadette;571950]Now that me + Ash is impossible I wonder how she will try to spin it.[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to 'spin' it as anything but a mislynch and if town hammers without hearing my defense, we lose. I'll just note that everyone was confident on Helz being scum in SA and look how that turned out. We have 24 hours so there isn't any reason to force the train on me without considering anything else.
Although I am not too concerned with being quick-hammered with RLVG so eh.
I still stand by Ash being scummy yesterday for trying to quick-hammer with no warning. However that was on a scum, so either Ash is town, likes to buss or he's ika 2.0
Originally Posted by Toadette
Seems pretty straightforward. Calix refused to even consider mintberry, even after Mintberry showed up.
Ash tried to hammer. RLVG maybe a case could be made for, but it seems unlikely.
In a LYLO type situation, makes sense why Calix would go for bust with the mislynch.
Why would I bother when I could have just bussed, gained free town-cred and avoid being lynched the next day? I'm not the sort who goes for the conventional approaches as scum, as my recent games show.
Originally Posted by Toadette
Also SJ giving Calix the gun is definitely in the realm of very probable, now that I think about it. He likes her a lot.
I don't have a gun. I don't think anyone does. Why wouldn't they have used it yesterday to reset the votes and save their ally?
Your last line makes no sense.
Originally Posted by Toadette
Now that me + Ash is impossible I wonder how she will try to spin it.
I'm not going to 'spin' it as anything but a mislynch and if town hammers without hearing my defense, we lose. I'll just note that everyone was confident on Helz being scum in SA and look how that turned out. We have 24 hours so there isn't any reason to force the train on me without considering anything else.
Although I am not too concerned with being quick-hammered with RLVG so eh.
I still stand by Ash being scummy yesterday for trying to quick-hammer with no warning. However that was on a scum, so either Ash is town, likes to buss or he's ika 2.0
[QUOTE=Brendan;571879]Why do they want to lynch Ash over Mint? I didn't see RLVG's reasoning. Are Calix and RLVG coordinating?[/QUOTE]
Get your head out of your arse. Ash's behavior has been extremely anti-town. RLVG has been a bloody saint in comparison. You haven't even said why you scum-read him.
(Also I don't care. Just lynch Ash the quick-hammerer, ffs)
Originally Posted by Brendan
Why do they want to lynch Ash over Mint? I didn't see RLVG's reasoning. Are Calix and RLVG coordinating?
Get your head out of your arse. Ash's behavior has been extremely anti-town. RLVG has been a bloody saint in comparison. You haven't even said why you scum-read him.
(Also I don't care. Just lynch Ash the quick-hammerer, ffs)
[QUOTE=Toadette;571843]You got me, I'm not disguised or hacked. Fuck.[/QUOTE]
[class=super-respected]By the way, did the Host just decide to take a wank or something? He literally just popped in to tell us "fuck you, no replacements" >_>[/class]
[QUOTE=Toadette;571840]I quit. I can't deal with this anymore. I need to stop signing for everything with shitlords and be selective. I just can't do it.
[COLOR="#FF0000"][b]-suicide[/COLOR][/b][/QUOTE]
[class=admin]This is a 100% Toadette post.
Also I am actually five years old and like shiny things.[/class]
Originally Posted by Toadette
I quit. I can't deal with this anymore. I need to stop signing for everything with shitlords and be selective. I just can't do it.
[QUOTE=Toadette;571789]No, mint should be modkilled. That way both ash and mint die. If at least one of them is scum its 3v1, Brendan probably dies and its 2v1 LYLO. If Ash is town and Mint is replaced its GG for scum.
But that's what you want isn't it?[/QUOTE]
Ash is NOT town for quick-hammering. He is scum. End of story.
I have checked the start times and the day is most definitely NOT over, so that excuse doesn't stand.
Originally Posted by Toadette
No, mint should be modkilled. That way both ash and mint die. If at least one of them is scum its 3v1, Brendan probably dies and its 2v1 LYLO. If Ash is town and Mint is replaced its GG for scum.
But that's what you want isn't it?
Ash is NOT town for quick-hammering. He is scum. End of story.
I have checked the start times and the day is most definitely NOT over, so that excuse doesn't stand.
[QUOTE=RLVG;571764]Alright, I can't come up with the random theory of having the gun but the host forgot to give feedback lol.
So we both have no feedback. Hmm. Well fuck, who the hell has the freaking gun?[/QUOTE]
Either nobody does or scum does.
A mislynch = 100% town loss
Lynching Ash would be the ideal option but we don't have the votes due to aforementioned players.
No Lynch = 50% town loss if there is no gun
Originally Posted by RLVG
Alright, I can't come up with the random theory of having the gun but the host forgot to give feedback lol.
So we both have no feedback. Hmm. Well fuck, who the hell has the freaking gun?
Either nobody does or scum does.
A mislynch = 100% town loss
Lynching Ash would be the ideal option but we don't have the votes due to aforementioned players.
Originally Posted by Mikecall
Haha xD, this game was actually something that could of been real good if a ton of discussion came along, not saying there wasnt a lot, but there was a lot more potential.
Reply With Quote
