[QUOTE=yzb25;867347]I think this would come closer to rewarding the behaviour Mag wants. But to really work, I think you would need to do the vote that gives voting power [I]before[/I] the actual plurality vote. If you do them simultaneously, people are just going to give voting power to whoever is supporting their top lynch candidate.
Also, how precisely would you use condorcet to rank voting power? If you mean using the preferences to fully rank people, you greatly increase the odds of "preference cycle"s by demanding a full ranking rather than just a first place winner.[/QUOTE]
whatdegree r u working on.master? phd?
Originally Posted by yzb25
I think this would come closer to rewarding the behaviour Mag wants. But to really work, I think you would need to do the vote that gives voting power before the actual plurality vote. If you do them simultaneously, people are just going to give voting power to whoever is supporting their top lynch candidate.
Also, how precisely would you use condorcet to rank voting power? If you mean using the preferences to fully rank people, you greatly increase the odds of "preference cycle"s by demanding a full ranking rather than just a first place winner.
Originally Posted by yzb25
Master's. Wanna do a phd. Applying this September.
Reply With Quote