Search:

[QUOTE=OzyWho;915877]As far as the topic of this thread is concerned, plurality and condercet are both the same in the sense of mandatory lynch at EOD.

Me personally I'm not a believer in condercet. As much as I'm not a fan of a 3 way tie with 2 votes on each at EoD1 - I'm not confident that condercet improves that scenario. If anything I think it's the opposite and is similar to yzb's voting system where the scum could vote each other if the numbers allow it - making it in my eyes even less informative than a 3 way tie EoD1 with just ~50% of votes present.[/QUOTE]

i didn't mean condorcet. I think voss expressed interest in other kinds of new voting systems too

Originally Posted by OzyWho

As far as the topic of this thread is concerned, plurality and condercet are both the same in the sense of mandatory lynch at EOD.

Me personally I'm not a believer in condercet. As much as I'm not a fan of a 3 way tie with 2 votes on each at EoD1 - I'm not confident that condercet improves that scenario. If anything I think it's the opposite and is similar to yzb's voting system where the scum could vote each other if the numbers allow it - making it in my eyes even less informative than a 3 way tie EoD1 with just ~50% of votes present.

i didn't mean condorcet. I think voss expressed interest in other kinds of new voting systems too

Ozy you should talk to [MENTION=6527]Voss[/MENTION] he’s very interested in finding new voting systems that might be better than the existing/usual options

Ozy you should talk to @Voss he’s very interested in finding new voting systems that might be better than the existing/usual options