Search:

[QUOTE=Helz;944870]I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.[/QUOTE]

I’m wondering how many of your shitposts I have missed because they look exactly like your other posts and your posts have so many words that I usually just skim them and nod in agreement.

Originally Posted by Helz

I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.

I’m wondering how many of your shitposts I have missed because they look exactly like your other posts and your posts have so many words that I usually just skim them and nod in agreement.

[QUOTE=OzyWho;944848]Of course it was Alex Jones who said it :laugh:[/QUOTE]

It actually turned out he was right in this specific circumstance IIRC

Originally Posted by OzyWho

Of course it was Alex Jones who said it

It actually turned out he was right in this specific circumstance IIRC

[QUOTE=Firebringer;944831]So audit results were that there was a lot of fraud/discrepencies, but not enough to swing the state. Am i getting it right, im way too lazy to actually look into this.

Even if audit result told us the state should have went to Trump, it wouldn't change anything.[/QUOTE]

Pretty much. There was a surprising amount of discrepancies, but the evidence suggests that all of it balanced itself out. The governor of Arizona has also said that even if the audit HAD concluded Trump should've won, that he would not support trying to "fix" the situation. (he used more elegant words but i dont remember them)

Originally Posted by Firebringer

So audit results were that there was a lot of fraud/discrepencies, but not enough to swing the state. Am i getting it right, im way too lazy to actually look into this.

Even if audit result told us the state should have went to Trump, it wouldn't change anything.

Pretty much. There was a surprising amount of discrepancies, but the evidence suggests that all of it balanced itself out. The governor of Arizona has also said that even if the audit HAD concluded Trump should've won, that he would not support trying to "fix" the situation. (he used more elegant words but i dont remember them)

[QUOTE=Renegade;944798][url]https://web.archive.org/web/20210925070200/https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-wxnvnq2xcu766[/url]

Looks like there's a snapshot of it, but I don't think it is complete.[/QUOTE]

"Massive fraud was found in the Arizona Forensic Audit, sometimes referred to as “Fraudit.” The numbers are Election Changing!"

This is actually fucking hilarious

Originally Posted by Renegade

https://web.archive.org/web/20210925...-wxnvnq2xcu766

Looks like there's a snapshot of it, but I don't think it is complete.

"Massive fraud was found in the Arizona Forensic Audit, sometimes referred to as “Fraudit.” The numbers are Election Changing!"

This is actually fucking hilarious

I recognize this is a shitpost but I actually quite enjoyed doing the research to figure out what the hell is going on. The audit is actually interesting to read because it's breaking down how each discrepancy impacted the election.

There were 53305 fraudulent or potentially fraudulent ballots found within the audit- which is a number that I actually found surprisingly high. Of that number, 24k were from people who moved within the county and voted twice. That's where the 24k number comes from in the original post (Trump's press release didn't actually have the correct source for the number.) The next highest cause was from people who were sent 1 mail in ballot and sent back more than 1. This was mostly 1 extra vote- but in extreme cases went up to 3 extra votes for a total of 4.

Of the 24k duplicate ballots of people who moved within Maricopa county and voted twice (either by choice, by accident, or by 3rd party interference), 33% of them were registered republicans. Of the 9k duplicate ballots from people who only were sent 1 ballot, 30% were registered republicans and 4% registered independents. If you take out these constraints, and realize that if the election was really swung into Biden's favor via fraud, then 75%-90% of the unregistered voters would've had to vote Biden. This conclusion can't be supported by the rest of the data in the paper- in some of the middle/lesser cases of fraud (sub 6k cases) there's actually a registered republican majority.

So... unironically thanks for posting this? Quite a fun read. I'm about 25% thru as of writing this and I'll probably continue reading it later.

I recognize this is a shitpost but I actually quite enjoyed doing the research to figure out what the hell is going on. The audit is actually interesting to read because it's breaking down how each discrepancy impacted the election.

There were 53305 fraudulent or potentially fraudulent ballots found within the audit- which is a number that I actually found surprisingly high. Of that number, 24k were from people who moved within the county and voted twice. That's where the 24k number comes from in the original post (Trump's press release didn't actually have the correct source for the number.) The next highest cause was from people who were sent 1 mail in ballot and sent back more than 1. This was mostly 1 extra vote- but in extreme cases went up to 3 extra votes for a total of 4.

Of the 24k duplicate ballots of people who moved within Maricopa county and voted twice (either by choice, by accident, or by 3rd party interference), 33% of them were registered republicans. Of the 9k duplicate ballots from people who only were sent 1 ballot, 30% were registered republicans and 4% registered independents. If you take out these constraints, and realize that if the election was really swung into Biden's favor via fraud, then 75%-90% of the unregistered voters would've had to vote Biden. This conclusion can't be supported by the rest of the data in the paper- in some of the middle/lesser cases of fraud (sub 6k cases) there's actually a registered republican majority.

So... unironically thanks for posting this? Quite a fun read. I'm about 25% thru as of writing this and I'll probably continue reading it later.